Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:44:08.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fatal Flaws in the Twin Study Paradigm: A Reply to Hatemi and Verhulst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Doron Shultziner
Doron Shultziner*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , Summer 2013 , pp. 390 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Miller, Peter. 2012. A thing or two about twins. National Geographic. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/01/twins/miller-text.Google Scholar
Silva, S., Martins, Y., Matias, A., and Blickstein, I. 2011. Why are monozygotic twins different? Journal of Perinatal Medicine 39(2): 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shultziner, Doron. 2010. Struggling for recognition: The psychological impetus for democratic progress. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Shultziner, D., Stevens, T., Stevens, M., Stewart, B. A., Hannagan, R. J., and Saltini-Semerari, G. 2010. The causes and scope of political egalitarianism during the Last Glacial: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Biology & Philosophy 25(3): 319–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhulst, Brad, and Hatemi, Peter K. 2013. Gene-environment interplay in twin models. Political Analysis 21: 368–89.Google Scholar