Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:53:39.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Gregory Wawro
Gregory Wawro*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Panel data are a very valuable resource for finding empirical solutions to political science puzzles. Yet numerous published studies in political science that use panel data to estimate models with dynamics have failed to take into account important estimation issues, which calls into question the inferences we can make from these analyses. The failure to account explicitly for unobserved individual effects in dynamic panel data induces bias and inconsistency in cross-sectional estimators. The purpose of this paper is to review dynamic panel data estimators that eliminate these problems. I first show how the problems with cross-sectional estimators arise in dynamic models for panel data. I then show how to correct for these problems using generalized method of moments estimators. Finally, I demonstrate the usefulness of these methods with replications of analyses in the debate over the dynamics of party identification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 25 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, Seung C., and Schmidt, Peter. 1995. “Efficient Estimation of Models for Dynamic Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 68:5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W., and Hsiao, Cheng. 1981. “Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:598–606.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. W., and Hsiao, Cheng. 1982. “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 18:47–82.Google Scholar
Arellano, Manuel. 1989. “A Note on the Anderson-Hsiao Estimator for Panel Data.” Economics Letters 31:337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, Manuel, and Bond, Stephen. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58:277–297.Google Scholar
Arellano, Manuel, and Bover, Olympia. 1995. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Component Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68:29–51.Google Scholar
Arellano, Manuel, and Honoré, Bo. 2001. “Panel Data Models: Some Recent Developments.” In Handbook of Econometrics, eds. Heckman, J. J. and Leamer, E. E. Amsterdam: North-Holland (in press). (Available at http://www.cemfi.es/∼arellano/.) Google Scholar
Baltagi, Badi H. 1995. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, Richard, and Bond, Stephen. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87:115–143.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Lin, Tse-min. 1996. “A Dynamic Model of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” Political Analysis 6:37–66.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Smith, Renée. 1996. “The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship.” American Political Science Review 90:567–580.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Mueller, Edward N. 1998. “Rational Choice and the Dynamics of Political Action: Evaluating Alternative Models with Panel Data.” American Political Science Review 92:37–51.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77:957–973.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Palmquist, Bradley. 1990. “Of Artifacts and Partisan Instability.” American Journal of Political Science 34:872–902.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Yoon, David H. 2002. “Reconciling Individual and Aggregate Evidence Concerning Partisan Stability: Applying Time-Series Models to Panel Survey Data” Political Analysis 10:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, William H. 1997. Econometric Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. P. 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moment Estimators.” Econometrica 50:1029–1054.Google Scholar
Himmelberg, Charles P., and Wawro, Gregory. 1998. “A Dynamic Panel Analysis of Campaign Contributions in Elections for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Paper presented at the Political Methodology Summer Conference and the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas, Newey, Whitney, and Rosen, Harvey S. 1988. “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data.” Econometrica 56:1371–1395.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Cheng. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1975. “Issues and Party Alignment.” In The Future of Political Parties, eds. Maisel, Louis and Sacks, Paul M. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 101–123.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Markus, Gregory B. 1984. “Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results From a Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 78:1000–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabashima, I., and Ishio, Y. 1998. “The Instability of Party Identification Among Eligible Japanese Voters: A Seven-Wave Panel Study, 1993-6.” Party Politics 4:151–176.Google Scholar
Keane, Michael P., and Runkle, David E. 1992. “On the Estimation of Panel Data Models with Serial Correlation When Instruments Are Not Strictly Exogenous.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:1–9.Google Scholar
Kiviet, Jan F. 1995. “On Bias, Inconsistency, and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68:53–78.Google Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S., Green, Donald P., and Cowden, Jonathan A. 1994. “The Dynamics of Campaign Fundraising in House Elections.” Journal of Politics 56:459–474.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1979a. Analyzing Panel Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1979b. “The Political Environment and the Dynamics of Public Attitudes: A Panel Study.” American Journal of Political Science 23:338–359.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1982. “Political Attitudes During an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 76:538–560.Google Scholar
Nickell, Stephen. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49:1417–1426.Google Scholar
Sargan, J. D. 1958. “The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables.” Econometrica 26:393–415.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29:914–947.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. No date. “Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ziliak, James P. 1997. “Efficient Estimation with Panel Data When Instruments Are Predetermined: An Empirical Comparison of Moment-Condition Estimators.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15:419–431.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wawro supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Wawro supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 37.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wawro supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Wawro supplementary material(File)
File 95.6 KB