Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:34:10.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting for Skewed or One-Sided Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2021

Daniel L. Millimet  and
Christopher F. Parmeter Open the ORCID record for Christopher F. Parmeter [Opens in a new window]
Daniel L. Millimet
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX75275-0496, USA Institute of Labor Economics, 53113Bonn, Germany
Christopher F. Parmeter*
Affiliation:
Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL33146, USA. Email: [email protected]
*
Corresponding author Christopher F. Parmeter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While classical measurement error in the dependent variable in a linear regression framework results only in a loss of precision, nonclassical measurement error can lead to estimates, which are biased and inference which lacks power. Here, we consider a particular type of nonclassical measurement error: skewed errors. Unfortunately, skewed measurement error is likely to be a relatively common feature of many outcomes of interest in political science research. This study highlights the bias that can result even from relatively “small” amounts of skewed measurement error, particularly, if the measurement error is heteroskedastic. We also assess potential solutions to this problem, focusing on the stochastic frontier model and Nonlinear Least Squares. Simulations and three replications highlight the importance of thinking carefully about skewed measurement error as well as appropriate solutions.

Keywords

measurement errorstochastic frontierheteroskedasticity
Type
Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 66 - 88
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Edited by Jeff Gill

References

Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., and Schmidt, P.. 1977. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6(1):21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsler, C., Prokhorov, A., and Schmidt, P.. 2016. “Endogeneity in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Econometrics 190(2):280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, H. B. 1974. “Some Consequences of Measurement Error in Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science 18(2):469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News. 2009. “Nepal Raises Conflict Death Toll.” BBC News, September 22. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8268651.stm.Google Scholar
Breusch, T. S., and Pagan, A. R.. 1979. “A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation.” Econometrica 47(5):1287–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudill, S. B., Ford, J. M., and Gropper, D. M.. 1995. “Frontier Estimation and Firm-Specific Inefficiency Measures in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(1):105–111.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., and D’Agostino, R. B. Jr. 1990. “A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality.” American Statistician 44(4):316–321.Google Scholar
Daniels, G., and Friedman, S.. 1999. “Spatial Inequality and the Distribution of Industrial Toxic Releases: Evidence from the 1990 TRI.” Social Science Quarterly 80(2):244–62.Google Scholar
Do, Q.-T., and Iyer, L.. 2010. “Geography, Poverty and Conflict in Nepal.” Journal of Peace Research 47(6):735–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galiani, S., Rossi, M. A., and Schargrodsky, E.. 2011. “Conscription and Crime: Evidence from the Argentine Draft Lottery.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(2):119–36.Google Scholar
Goel, R. K., and Nelson, M. A.. 1998. “Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis.” Public Choice 97:107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofler, R. A., and List, J. A.. 2004. “Valuation on the Frontier: Calibrating Actual and Hypothetical Statements of Value.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(1):213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., and Yamamoto, T.. 2010. “Causal Inference with Differential Measurement Error: Nonparametric Identification and Sensitivity Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2):543–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, M., and Pyakurel, S. R.. 2015. “Individual-Level Data on the Victims of Nepal’s Civil War, 1996-2006: A New Data Set.” International Interactions 41(3):601–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. N., and Katz, G.. 2010. “Correcting for Survey Misreports Using Auxiliary Information with an Application to Estimating Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 54(3):815–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishore, N, et al. 2018. “Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria.” New England Journal of Medicine 379:162–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kono, D. Y. 2017. “Tariffs and Carbon Emissions.” International Interactions 43(6):895–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. B., and Laitin, D. D.. 2004. “Misunderestimating Terrorism.” Foreign Affairs 83(5):8–13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumbhakar, S. C., Parmeter, C. F., and Tsionas, E. G.. 2012. “Bayesian Estimation Approaches to First-Price Auctions.” Journal of Econometrics 168(1):47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millimet, D. L., and Parmeter, C. F.. 2020a. “Replication Data for: Accounting for Skewed or One-Sided Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable.” Code Ocean. https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.2548901.v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millimet, D. L., and Parmeter, C. F.. 2020b. “Replication Data for: Accounting for Skewed or One-Sided Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IKSE2O, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:jVJKwmh81MIerCTJdmSBiw== [fileUNF].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nepal, M., Bohara, A. K., and Gawande, K.. 2011. “More Inequality, More Killings: The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal.” American Journal of Political Science 55(4):885–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, A. R., and Hall, A. D.. 1983. “Diagnostic Tests as Residual Analysis.” Econometric Reviews 2(2):159–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmeter, C. F., and Kumbhakar, S. C.. 2014. “Efficiency Analysis: A Primer on Recent Advances.” Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 7(3-4):191–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ReliefWeb. 2009. “Nepal Government Raises War Death Toll.” http://reliefweb.int/report/nepal/nepal-government-raises-war-death-toll.Google Scholar
Royston, P. 1991. “sg3.5: Comment on sg3.4 and an Improved D’Agostino Test.” Stata Technical Bulletin 3:23–24.Google Scholar
Santos Silva, J. M. C., and Tenreyro, S.. 2006. “The Log of Gravity.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4):641–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H.-J., and Schmidt, P.. 2002. “One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 18(September):129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedmann, N. B. 2016. “A Closer Look at Reporting Bias in Conflict Event Data.” American Journal of Political Science 60(1):206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Millimet and Parmeter Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IKSE2O
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Millimet and Parmeter supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Millimet and Parmeter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 394.6 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Millimet and Parmeter supplementary material

Appendix 2

Download Millimet and Parmeter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 357.3 KB