Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-12T15:12:59.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Sides of the Same Coin? Employing Granger Causality Tests in a Time Series Cross-Section Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2008

M. V. Hood III ,
Quentin Kidd  and
Irwin L. Morris
M. V. Hood III
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, 104 Baldwin Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-1615, USA, email: [email protected]
Quentin Kidd
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Christopher Newport University, 1 University Place, Newport News, VA 23606, USA, email: [email protected]
Irwin L. Morris*
Affiliation:
Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland at College Park, 3140 Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a recently developed methodology for assessing the assumption of causal homogeneity in a time series cross-section Granger framework. Following a description of the procedure and the analytical contexts for which it is appropriate, we implement this new approach to examine the transformation of the post-World War II party system in the South. Specifically, we analyze the causal relationship between black mobilization and GOP growth in the region. We find that black mobilization Granger caused Republican growth throughout the South, whereas Republican growth Granger caused black mobilization only in the deep South. We discuss the substantive significance of our results and conclude with guidelines for the appropriate use of this procedure and suggestions for future extensions of the method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Summer 2008 , pp. 324 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Authors' note: We would like to thank Christophe Hurlin and Baptiste Venet for their path-breaking work in this area and especially for the helpful comments provided by Professor Hurlin. In addition, we would also like to thank Geoff Layman, Mike Hanmer, and the participants of the American Politics Workshop at the University of Maryland, College Park for their helpful advice. A previous version of the manuscript was presented at the 2006 Citadel Symposium on Southern Politics.

References

America Votes. 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Arrellano, Manuel, and Bond, Stephen. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: MonteCarlo evidence and an application to unemployment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–97.Google Scholar
Baltagi, Badi H. 2005. Econometric analysis of panel data. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Baum, Christopher F., and Wiggins, Vince. 2001. Tests for Long Memory in a Time Series. Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, Volume 10. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., and Lake, David A. 2003. The political economy of growth: Democracy and human capital. American Journal of Political Science 47: 333–47.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2007. From statistical nuisances to serious modeling: Changing how we think about the analysis of time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis 15(2): 97–100.Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1987. Politics and society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1992. The vital south. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 2002. The rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Gilliam, Franklin D. 1990. Race, sociopolitical participation, and black political empowerment. American Political Science Review 84: 377–97.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and De Boef, Suzanna. 2001. Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate. Journal of Politics 63: 232–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Rufus P., Marshall, Dale Rogers, and Tabb, David H. 1984. Protest is not enough: The struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for equality in urban politics. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, III, Charles, S., and Gaddie, Ronald Keith. 2005a. An assessment of voting rights progress in Georgia. Report prepared for the Project on Fair Representation, American Enterprise Institute. http://www.aei.org/publications.Google Scholar
Bullock, III, Charles, S., and Gaddie, Ronald Keith. 2005b. An Assessment of voting rights progress in South Carolina. Report prepared for the Project on Fair Representation, American Enterprise Institute. http://www.aei.org/publications.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward, and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Current Population Reports: P-20 Series on Voting and Registration. U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. [1980-Table 5; 1982-Table 16, 1984-Table 2; 1986-Table 4; 1988-Table 2; 1990-Table 4; 1992-Table 4; 1994-Table 4a (electronic version); 1996-Table 4 (electronic version); 1998-Table 4 (electronic version); 2000-Table 4a (electronic version); 2002-Table 4a (electronic version); 2004-Table 4a (electronic version)]. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
David, Paul T. 1972. Party strength in the United States, 1872-1970. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Davis, E. Philip, and Hu, Yuwei. 2004. Is there a link between pension-fund assets and economic growth—A cross-country study. Working paper. The Pensions Institute, City University: London.Google Scholar
Enders, Walter, and Sandler, Todd. 2000. Is transnational terrorism becoming more threatening? A time-series investigation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44: 307–32.Google Scholar
Erdil, Erkan, and Hakan Yetkiner, I. 2005. A panel data approach for income-health causality. In The economics of health reforms, ed. Yfantopoulos, John N., 701–24. Athens: Atiner Publications.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive W. J. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–38.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Guide to U.S. Elections. 3rd ed. 1994. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Frederick C., Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria, and McKenzie, Brian D. 2005. Macrodynamics of Black Political Participation in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Journal of Politics. 67: 1143–63.Google Scholar
Heard, Alexander. 1952. A two-party South? Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1981. The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. In Structural Analysis of Discrete Panel Data with Econometric Applications, ed. Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D., 179–95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heo, Uk, and Tan, Alexander C. 2001. Democracy and economic growth: A causal analysis. Comparative Politics 33: 463–73.Google Scholar
Douglas, Holtz-Eakin, Newey, Whitney, and Rosen, Harvey S. 1988. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56: 1371–96.Google Scholar
Hood III, M. V., Kidd, Quentin, and Morris, Irwin. 2004. The reintroduction of the Elephas Maximus to the Southern United States: The rise of Republican State Parties, 1960 to 2000. American Politics Research 31: 68–101.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Cheng. 1986. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurlin, Christophe. 2005. Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous panel data models [English Title]. Revue Economique 56: 1–11.Google Scholar
Hurlin, Christophe, and Venet, Baptiste. 2001. Granger causality tests in panel data models with fixed coefficients. Working paper Eurisco 2001-09, University of Paris Dauphine.Google Scholar
Hurlin, Christophe, and Venet, Baptiste. 2004. Financial development and growth: A re-examination using a panel Granger test. Working paper. University of Orléans, University of Paris Dauphine.Google Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. 1997. Elements of econometrics. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kovandzic, Tomislav, and Marvell, Thomas B. 2003. Right-to-carry concealed handguns and violent crime: Crime control through gun decontrol? Criminology and Public Policy 2: 363–96.Google Scholar
Lamis, Alexander P. 1988. The two-party South. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., Polinard, L., and Wrinkle, Robert D. 2000. Bureaucracy and organizational performance: Causality arguments about public schools. American Journal of Political Science. 44: 590–602.Google Scholar
Moore, Will H., and Lanoue, David J. 2003. Domestic politics and U.S. Foreign Policy: A study of cold war conflict behavior. Journal of Politics 65: 376–96.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, and Stanley, Harold W. 1993. Class polarization in partisanship among native Southern Whites, 1952-90. American Journal of Political Science 37: 900–19.Google Scholar
Podrecca, Elena, and Carmeci, Gaetano. 2001. Fixed investment and economic growth: New results on causality. Applied Economics 33: 177–82.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Terrel L. 2000. Republicans in the South: Voting for the State House, Voting for the White House. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shafer Byron, E., and Johnston, R. G. C. 2001. The transformation of Southern politics revisited: The House of Representatives as a window. British Journal of Political Science. 31: 601–25.Google Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999. The effect of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-96. American Political Science Review 93: 345–61.Google Scholar
Statistical Abstract of the U.S. U.S. Department of Commerce. United States Bureau of the Census. [1976-Table 747; 1979-Table 840; 1980-Table 849]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vella, Francis, and Verbeek, Marno. 1998. Whose wages do unions raise? A dynamic model of unionism and wage rate determination for young men. Journal of Applied Econometrics 13: 163–83.Google Scholar
Vella, Francis, and Verbeek, Marno. 1999. Two-step estimation of panel data models with censored endogenous variables and selection bias. Journal of Econometrics 90: 239–63.Google Scholar
VEP [Voter Education Project] News. [1968-Vol.2, no. 4; 1969-Vol. 3, no. 12; 1970-Vol. 4, nos. 1,2]. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Council.Google Scholar
Weinhold, Diana, and Nair, Usha. 2001. Causality tests for cross country panels: A new look at FDI and economic growth in less developed countries. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63: 153–72.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sven E., and Butler, Daniel M. 2007. A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series-cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Political Analysis 15(2): 101–23.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2000. A framework for estimating dynamic, unobserved effects panel data models with possible feedback to future explanatory variables. Economics Letters 68: 245–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2005. Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem for dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics 20: 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar