Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:13:25.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to “Erratum for Glynn and Quinn (2011)”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Adam N. Glynn  and
Kevin M. Quinn
Adam N. Glynn*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Emory University, 303 Tarbutton Hall, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322
Kevin M. Quinn
Affiliation:
UC Berkeley School of Law, 490 Simon No. 7200, Berkeley, CA 94720-7200, e-mail: [email protected]
*
e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Electronic Materials
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , Winter 2016 , pp. e3 - e4
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glynn, Adam N., and Quinn, Kevin M. 2011. Why process matters for causal inference. Political Analysis 19(3): 273–86.Google Scholar
Pellissier, Allyson L. 2016. Erratum for Glynn and Quinn (2011). Political Analysis 24:97–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar