Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:31:56.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Institutionalization of the U.S. Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Kevin T. McGuire
Kevin T. McGuire*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Political Science, 361 Hamilton Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3265. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In pursuing their goals, members of the U.S. Supreme Court are affected by their institutional setting. How has that institutional environment changed over time and what have been the political consequences of those changes? Despite considerable analysis of the institutional dynamics of legislatures and executives, political scientists have been slow to bring time series techniques to the study of the Supreme Court, and as a result much less is known about its evolutionary path. Measuring a variety of organizational characteristics, I construct an index of the institutionalization of the Supreme Court from 1790 to 1996. This indicator suggests that the integration of the Court into the system of federal policy making has better enabled the justices to satisfy their objectives. To demonstrate this empirically, I test a series of error correction models of judicial influence, each of which confirms that the nature of the Supreme Court's character has had considerable implications for the scope of the justices' legal and political impact. These results underscore the need for judicial scholars to examine the Court's policy making in longitudinal perspective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 2004 , pp. 128 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., and Feldman, Stanley. 1985. Multiple Regression in Practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., and Lowery, David. 1987. Understanding United States Government Growth: An Empirical Analysis of the Postwar Era. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Biskupic, Joan, and Witt, Elder. 1997. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1987. The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and McCrone, Donald J. 1982. “Of Time and Judicial Activism: A Study of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1800–1973.” In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, eds. Halpern, Stephen C. and Lamb, Charles M. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 70: 50–63.Google Scholar
Cook, Beverly B. 1993. “Measuring the Significance of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions.” Journal of Politics 55: 1127–1139.Google Scholar
De Boef, Suzanna. 2000. “Modeling Equilibrium Relationships: Error Correction Models with Strongly Autoregressive Data.” Political Analysis 9: 78–94.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H. 1992. “An Essay on Cointegration and Error Correction Models.” Political Analysis 4: 185–228.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1964. “Institutionalization and Change.” American Sociological Review 29: 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Robert F., and Granger, C. W. J. 1987. “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55: 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Peter Graham. 1973. The Politics of Federal Judicial Administration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and Landis, James M. 1928. The Business of the Supreme Court: A Study in the Federal Judicial System. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freeman, John R. 1983. “Granger Causality and the Time Series Analysis of Political Relationships.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 327–358.Google Scholar
Freeman, John R., Houser, Daniel, Kellstedt, Paul M., and Williams, John T. 1998. “Long-Memoried Processes, Unit Roots, and Causal Inference in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 1289–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Lancaster, Thomas D. 1989. “Political Transition, Social Development, and Legal Mobilization in Spain.” American Political Science Review 83: 817–833.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Perspectives, eds. Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 65–87.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1974. “Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800–1971.” American Political Science Review 68: 1482–1504.Google Scholar
Haines, Charles Grove. 1959. The American Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 54: 427–446.Google Scholar
Hedlund, Ronald D. 1985. “Organizational Attributes of Legislative Institutions: Structure, Rules, Norms, Resources.” In Handbook of Legislative Research, eds. Loewenberg, Gerhard, Patterson, Samuel C., and Jewell, Malcolm E. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 321–391.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1988. “Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 681–712.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1969. “Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly.” International Organization 23: 859–896.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. 1991. “Courts and Socioeconomic Change.” In The American Courts: A Critical Assessment, eds. Gates, John B. and Johnson, Charles A. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
McIver, John P., and Carmines, Edward. 1981. Unidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Hildreth, Anne. 1984. “Legislatures and Political Stability: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Politics 46: 25–59.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, David M. 2000. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, 5th ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Perry, H. W. Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62: 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn, and Theis, John J. 1997. “The Institutionalization of the American Presidency, 1924–92.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1280–1318.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 16: 652–682.Google Scholar
Schmidhauser, John R. 1959. “The Justices of the Supreme Court: A Collective Portrait.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 3: 1–57.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard. 1993. A History of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Bonchek, Mark S. 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sims, Christopher. 1972. “Money, Income and Causality.” American Economic Review 62: 540–552.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly.” Journal of Politics 54: 1026–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur A. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles. 1937. The Supreme Court in United States History. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 1991. The Marshall Court and Cultural Change, 1815–1835. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, James Sterling. 1966. The Washington Community 1800–1828. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

McGuire supplementary material

Appendix

Download McGuire supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 17 KB