Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:34:38.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wilderness and aesthetic values in the Antarctic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Rosamunde Codling
Rosamunde Codling
Affiliation:
Chapel Loke, 4 Church Street, Wymondham, Norfolk NR18 0PH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Article 3 of the 1991 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties committed themselves to ‘the protection of the Antarctic environment…and the intrinsic value of Antarctica, including its wilderness and aesthetic values.’ The phraseology of the Protocol requires clarification. ‘Wilderness and aesthetic values’ links two disparate concepts, best handled by separation. Annex V, Article 3, of the Protocol covers many topics, and their assessment must be by a composite of frameworks specifically designed for the different purposes set out in the Annex.

A working definition of wilderness in the Antarctic is suggested: ‘Any part of the Antarctic in which neither permanent habitation nor any other permanent evidence of present or past human presence is visible.’ Using this, a very high proportion of the continent will be recognised as having wilderness status. The phrase ‘aesthetic values’ should be seen as part of a wider process—Landscape Character Assessment—that is at present unknown to most in the Antarctic community. It is based on the principle of objective description and classification of landscape character. This basic characterisation can then be put to different uses, one of which may be to make more subjective judgements or evaluations that lead to area designations.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 37 , Issue 203 , October 2001 , pp. 337 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R. 1977. Wilderness areas in Scotland. Unpublished PhD thesis. Aberdeen: Department of Geography, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Appleton, J. 1990. The symbolism of habitat: an interpretation of landscape in the arts. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
ATCPs. 1993. Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Record 29 (170): 256–275; SCAR Bulletin 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ATCPs. 2000. Measures, Decisions and Resolutions adopted at the XXIIIrd Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Lima, Peru, 24 May–4 June 1999. Polar Record 36 (196): 75–93; SCAR Bulletin 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benninghoff, W.S. 1974. Macrobiology and ecology in polar deserts. In: Smiley, T.L., and Zumberge, J.H. (editors). Polar deserts and modern man. Tucson: University of Arizona: 91–97.Google Scholar
Bishop, I.D. 1999. Modelling the view: perception and visualization. In Usher, M.B. (editor). Landscape character: perspectives on management and change. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office: 150–161.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management. 1980. Visual resource management program. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.Google Scholar
Codling, R.J. 1998a. Wilderness and aesthetic values in the Antarctic. Unpublished PhD thesis. Milton Keynes: Department of Geography, The Open University.Google Scholar
Codling, R.J. 1998b. Wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. Unpublished information paper submitted to the XXII Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Tromsø, May 1998.Google Scholar
Countryside Commission. 1993. Landscape assessment guidance. Cheltenham: Countryside Commission (CCP 423).Google Scholar
Countryside Commission and English Nature. 1996. The character of England: landscape, wildlife and natural features. Cheltenham: Countryside Commission.Google Scholar
Countryside Commission for Scotland. 1971. A planning classification of Scottish landscape resources. Battleby: Countryside Commission for Scotland.Google Scholar
Crawford, D. 1994. Using remotely sensed data in landscape visual quality assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 30: 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallos, R. 1992. Social psychology: development, experience and behaviour in a social world: Option 5, The Kelly Project. Material from unit D307. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
Duffield, B.S., and Coppock, J.T.. 1975. The delineation of recreational landscapes: the role of a computer-based information system. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 66: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irland, L.C. 1979. Wilderness economics and policy. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
IUCN. 1991. A strategy for Antarctic conservation. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
IUCN. 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories. Cambridge: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., andRyan, R.L.. 1998. With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Kroh, D.P. and Gimblett, R.H.. 1992. Comparing live experience with pictures in articulating landscape preference. Landscape Research 17 (2): 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis Smith, R.I. 1994. Environmental-geographic basis for Protected Area System. In: Lewis Smith, R.I., Walton, D.W.H., and Dingwall, P.R. (editors). Developing the Antarctic Protected Area System: proceedings of the SCAR/IUCN workshop. Conservation of southern polar regions 1. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: 27–36.Google Scholar
Litton, R.B. Jr, 1979. Descriptive approaches to landscape analysis. In: Eisner, G.H., and Smardon, R.C. (technical coordinators). Proceedings of Our national landscape: conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource, Incline Village, Nevada, 23–25 April, 1979. Berkeley: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service (General technical report PSW-35): 77–87.Google Scholar
Markov, K.K., Bardin, V.I., Lebedev, V.L, Orlov, A.I., andSuetova, I.A.. 1970. The geography of Antarctica. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations. (Originally published 1968, Moscow.)Google Scholar
Muir, R. 1999. Approaches to landscape. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, R. 1982. Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Penning-Rowsell, E.C. 1986. Themes, speculations and research agenda. In: Penning-Rowsell, E.C., and Lowenthal, D. (editors). Landscape meanings and values. London: Landscape Research Group/Allen and Unwin: 114–128.Google Scholar
Reich, R.J. 1979. Tourism in the Antarctic: its present impact and future development. Unpublished Diploma dissertation. Cambridge: Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richardson, M.G. 1998. The Protocol on Environmental Protection enters into force. Polar Record 34 (189): 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymill, J., Stephenson, A., andMill, H.R.. 1938. Southern lights: the official account of the British Graham Land Expedition 1934–1937. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
SCAR. 1994. Report of the Working Group on Biology Meeting, Rome, August 1994. Cambridge: SCAR.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. 1995. The reflexive self. In: Social psychology: personal lives, social worlds. Book 1, chapter 4; material from unit D317. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
Stringer, P. 1976. Repertory grids in the study of environmental perception. In: Slater, P. (editor). The measurement of intrapersonal space by grid technique. Volume 1: Explorations of intrapersonal space. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Swanwick, C. 1991. Landscape assessment: principles and practice. Battleby: Countryside Commission for Scotland.Google Scholar
Swanwick, C., Cole, L., andDiacono, M.. 1999. Interim Landscape Character Assessment guidance. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage.Google Scholar
Swithinbank, C. 1988. Satellite image atlas of the world: Antarctica. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office (US Geological Survey professional paper 1386-B).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1994. Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention: WHC/2/Revised. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Usher, M.B. (editor). 1999. Landscape character: perspectives on management and change. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Young, R. 1994. Landscape mapping in England using airphoto based land systems mapping approach. Landscape Research 19 (3): 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar