Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:04:48.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When fishing means resilience: the evolution of small boat fishing practices in Iceland since 1990 and the new development of longline fishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Emilie Mariat-Roy*
Affiliation:
EHESS/MHNH, CETMA-Anthropopologie maritime, 43 Rue Cuvier, BP 26, 75005 Paris, France ([email protected])

Abstract

This article analyses the historical conditions and technical, social, commercial and political factors that have contributed to the revival of longline fishing in Iceland. Longline fishing practices have had important consequences at both the local and the national levels. This article deals, firstly, with the juridical and historical conditions of the development of small boat fishing practices since the beginning of the 1990s and the process through which small boats became progressively larger. Secondly, the paper describes the evolution of longline fishing practices and focuses more specifically on the technical, commercial, social and professional aspects of a new version of longline fishing that was developed in response to new marine management rules. It then deals with a specific kind of competitiveness that those living in coastal villages established to re-boost the local economy and discusses what has happened to small boat owners since 2000. The conclusion highlights the way longline fishing, by reconnecting social ties, takes part in the construction of contemporary Icelandic culture.

Type
Northern fisheries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akrich, M. 1989. La construction d’un système sociotechnique. Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques. Anthropologie et sociétés 13 (2): 3154.Google Scholar
Akrich, M. 1994. Comment sortir de la dichotomie technique/ société. Présentation des diverses sociologies de la technique. In: Latour, B. and Lemonnier, P. (editors). De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques. L’intelligence sociale des techniques. Paris: La Découverte: 105131.Google Scholar
Arnason, R. 1995. The Icelandic fisheries: evolution and management of a fishing industry. Oxford: Fishing New Books.Google Scholar
Arnason, R. 2008. Iceland's ITQ system creates new wealth. The electronic journal of sustainable development 1 (2): 3541.Google Scholar
Einarsson, N. 2011. Culture, conflict and crises in the Icelandic fisheries. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Eyþórsson, E. 2003. Stakeholders, courts and communities: individual transferable quotas in Icelandic fisheries, 1991–2001. In: Dolšak, N. and Ostrom, E. (editors). The commons in the new millennium: challenges and adaptation. Cambridge: MIT Press: 129169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geistdoerfer, A. 1981. Les pêcheurs des îles de la Madeleine, ‘des engagés’, ‘des producteurs indépendants. Techniques et Cultures. Bulletin de l’Equipe de Recherche 191 (5): 183.Google Scholar
Geistdoerfer, A. 1982. Fonctions spécifiques des techniques de pêche dans une production halieutique. Techniques and Culture 2: 8798.Google Scholar
Guðmundsson, G. 1981. Tögaraöldin, Stórveldismenn og Kotkarlar [Social history, trawl fishing and social stratification]. Reykjavík: Örn og Örlyggur.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, J. P. 1999. Frá linuveiðum til togveiða. Þættir úr söguútgerðar á Ísafirði frá 1934 til 1993. [From longline to trawl-fishing: boat-operating in Isafjördur from 1934 to 1993]. Ísafjörður: SögufélagÍsfirðinga.Google Scholar
Hannesson, R. 2004. The privatization of the oceans. Boston, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Helgason, A. 1995. The lords of the sea and the morality of exchange: the social context of the ITQ management in the Icelandic fisheries. Unpublished Masters dissertation. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Helgason, A. and Pálsson, G.. 1998. Cash for quotas: disputes over the legitimacy of an economic model of fishing in Iceland. In: Carrier, J. and Miller, D. (editors). Virtualism: the new political economy. Oxford: Berg: 117134.Google Scholar
Iceland. 2006. Icelandic Fisheries Management Laws, 2006 nr 116, 10 August 2006, 1st chapter, 1st article.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, P. 1994. Choix techniques et représentation de l’enfermement chez les Anga de Nouvelle-Guinée. In: Latour, B. and Lemonnier, P.. De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques: l’intelligence sociale des techniques. Paris: La Découverte: 253272.Google Scholar
Magnússon, S. M. 1985. Iceland in transition: labour and socio-economic change before 1940. Lund: Ekonomisk-historiskaföreningen.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C.B., Norgaard, R.B. and Policansky, D.. 1999. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284 (5412): 278282.Google Scholar
Pálsson, G. and Pétursdóttir, G. (editors). 1997. Property rights in the fishery industry. Reykjavik: Fisheries Research Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1977. Those who live from the sea: a study in maritime anthropology. Saint-Paul: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Wailey, T. and Lummis, T. (editors). 1983. Living the fishing. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (History Workshop Series).Google Scholar