Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:22:42.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visualising cryospheric images in a virtual environment: present challenges and future implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Lisa M. Ballagh ,
Mark A. Parsons  and
Ross Swick
Lisa M. Ballagh
Affiliation:
National Snow and Ice Data Center. 449 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Mark A. Parsons
Affiliation:
National Snow and Ice Data Center. 449 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Ross Swick
Affiliation:
National Snow and Ice Data Center. 449 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) initiated an outreach project to enhance the visibility of and interest in cryospheric images. Methods were utilised to convert cryospheric data into a projection and image format compatible with Google Earth™. The word ‘image’ should be emphasised since raster data in a native polar projection and format cannot be overlaid on the Earth without prior data conversions. The project focused on reaching out to a diverse audience by integrating images from key components of the cryosphere into a single compressed Keyhole Markup Language (KMZ) file. As a result, users can visualise glacier photographs, permafrost type and extent, sea ice concentration and extent, and snow extent superimposed on the Earth. Those interested in browsing the NSIDC collection of over 3,000 glacier photographs have the option of zooming into Alaska for a majority of the images and accessing both the photograph and the associated metadata. For a current perspective of global snow and ice coverage, one could look at satellite imagery derived from passive microwave Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) data. Another option is to select the permafrost layer and observe the various types and extent of permafrost. This paper explores the project by describing the data, methodologies and results and concludes with future implications on how to improve the processing and functionality of polar data in Google Earth.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 305 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, J., Ferrians, O.J. Jr., Heginbottom, J.A., and Melnikov, E.S. (editors). 1997. Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground-ice conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources (Circum-Pacific map series CP-45, scale 1:10,000,000, 1 sheet).Google Scholar
Brown, J., Ferrians, O.J. Jr., Heginbottom, J.A., and Melnikov, E.S.. 1998. Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground-ice conditions. Boulder: National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology (revised February 2001).Google Scholar
Everdingen, R. van (editor). 1998. Multi-language glossary of permafrost and related ground-ice terms. Boulder: National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. URL: http://nsidc.org/fgdc/glossary/ (Accessed 25 August 2006).Google Scholar
Geography. 2006. Geography 2.0: virtual globes. URL: http://geography2.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_geography2_archive.html (Accessed 20 August 2006).Google Scholar
Geospatialmethods 2007. Geospatial Methods. URL: http://www.geospatialmethods.org/ (Accessed 9 February 2007).Google Scholar
Goodchild, M.F., and Proctor, J.. 1997. Scale in a digital world. Geographical and Environmental Modelling 1 (1): 5–23.Google Scholar
Google Earth. 2006. Google Earth KML 2.0. A 3-D interface to the planet. URL: http://earth.google.com/kml/kml_overview.html (Accessed 30 August 2006).Google Scholar
Heginbottom, J.A., Brown, J., Melnikov, E.S., and Ferrians, O.J. Jr., 1993. Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground ice conditions. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Permafrost, Wushan. Guangzhou, China: South China University. Vol. 2: 1132–1136 (Revised December 1997. Boulder: National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology).Google Scholar
ImageMagick. 2006. Convert, edit and compose images. In: Introduction to ImageMagick. URL: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php (Accessed 26 August 2006).Google Scholar
NOHRSC (National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center). 2006. National Snow Analysis 3-D Interface. URL: http://www.nohrsc.noaa.gov/earth/. (Accessed 20 August 2006).Google Scholar
NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center). 2005. Annual Report 2005. URL: http://nsidc.org/pubs/annual/NSIDC_Annual_Report_2005.pdf (Accessed 31 January 2007).Google Scholar
NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center). 2007. Snow, ice, glaciers and permafrost file for Google Earth. View NSIDC data on virtual globes: Google Earth. Digital media. URL: http://nsidc.org/data/virtual_globes/ (Accessed 13 February 2007).Google Scholar
NetPBM. 2006. About NetPBM. URL: http://netpbm.sourceforge.net/ (Accessed 26 August 2006).Google Scholar
Nolin, A., Armstrong, R.L., and Maslanik, J.. 1998. Near real-time SSM/I EASE-Grid daily global ice concentration and snow extent. Boulder: National Snow and Ice Data Center (updated daily).Google Scholar
NSIDC/WDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology). 2006. Online glacier photograph database. Boulder: National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology.Google Scholar
Technical University of Denmark. 2006. Polarview-Earth observation for polar monitoring. URL: http://www.seaice.dk/damocles/google/ (Accessed 20 August 2006).Google Scholar
Tobler, W. 1988. Resolution, resampling, and all that. In: Mounsey, H. (editor). Building databases for global science. London and New York:Taylor and Francis: 129–137.Google Scholar