Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:21:06.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use and abuse of dogs on Scott's and Amundsen's South Pole expeditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Carl Murray
Carl Murray*
Affiliation:
Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 77, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the century since Roald Amundsen and Robert F. Scott led the first and second expeditions to reach the South Pole, commentators have frequently passed judgement on the different means of transport that the two explorers employed. In hindsight, and since he ‘won,’ they have consistently praised Amundsen for using dogs exclusively and criticised Scott for not doing the same. Surprisingly, however, almost no attention has been given to the experience of Amundsen's dogs, whose extreme suffering seems to have vanished into a collective blind spot. Here, with the aim of restoring balance to one part of the vexed historiography of the two explorers, that record is set straight. Amundsen's troubled and contradictory attitude towards his animals is also explored and common misconceptions about Scott's views on the use of dogs for transport are confuted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 303 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amundsen, R. 1976. The South Pole: an account of the Norwegian Antarctic Expedition in the ‘Fram,’ 1910–1912 (translator A.G. Chater). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press (facsimile of original work published in 1912).Google Scholar
Anthi, P.R. 1999. A study in rivalry, masochism and paranoia. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 80: 995–1010.Google Scholar
Arluke, A., and Sanders, C.R.. 1996. Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, C. 1927. An introduction to the study of experimental medicine (translator Greene, H.C.). New York: Macmillan (original work published in French in 1865).Google Scholar
Bomann-Larsen, T. 2006. Roald Amundsen. (translator I. Christophersen). Phoenix Mill: Sutton.Google Scholar
Cherry-Garrard, A. 1994. The worst journey in the world. London: Picador (original work published in 1922).Google Scholar
Drewry, D.J., and Huntford, R.. 1979. Amundsen's route to the South Pole. Polar Record 19 (121): 329–336.Google Scholar
Fiennes, R. 2003. Captain Scott. London: Hodder.Google Scholar
Harrison, B. 1973. Animals and the state in nineteenth-century England. The English Historical Review 88: 786–820.Google Scholar
Hanssen, H. 1936. Voyages of a modern viking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayes, J.G. 1928. Antarctica: a treatise on the southern continent. London: Richards.Google Scholar
Hearne, V. 1995. Animal happiness. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Huntford, R. 1993. Scott and Amundsen. London: Weidenfeld (original work published in 1979).Google Scholar
Jones, M. 2003. The last great quest: Captain Scott's Antarctic sacrifice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, C., and Kirby, A.. 1991. In the nature of things: the environment and everyday life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansbury, C. 1985. The old brown dog: women, workers, and vivisection in Edwardian England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Jones, H.W.G. 2005. ‘Heroism displayed’: revisiting the Franklin Gallery at the Royal Naval Exhibition, 1891. Polar Record 41 (218): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manhire, B. 2005. Dogs. London Review of Books 3 March 2005: 6.Google Scholar
Markham, C.R. 1921. The lands of silence: a history of Arctic and Antarctic exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, C. 2006. ‘Scott of the Antarctic’: the conservation of a story. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Tasmania. URL: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2627/.Google Scholar
Noske, B. 1997. Beyond boundaries: humans and animals. Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
Pound, R. 1966. Scott of the Antarctic. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Rosove, M.H. 2000. Let heroes speak: Antarctic explorers, 1772–1922. Annapolis: Naval Institute.Google Scholar
Scott, R.F. 1905. The voyage of the ‘Discovery’ (Vol 1). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R.F. 1911. Letter to Joseph Kinsey. 28 October 1911. Wellington, New Zealand: Alexander Turnbull Library, Tapuhi collection Ms. Papers-0022-06 (Official Correspondence, Captain R.F. Scott to J.J. Kinsey 1901–1911).Google Scholar
Spufford, F. 1996. I may be some time: ice and the English imagination. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Turley, C. 1935. Roald Amundsen, explorer. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wallsgrove, R. 1980. The masculine face of science. In: Birke, L., Faulkner, W., Best, S., Janson-Smith, D., and Overfield, K. (editors). Alice through the microscope: the power of science over women's lives. London: Virago: 228–240.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. 1966. Diary of the ‘Discovery’ expedition to the Antarctic regions 1901–1904. (editor Savours, A.). London: Blandford.Google Scholar