Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:51:13.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of Russian ice-breaking tariff policy on the northern sea route 1991–2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2015

Daria Gritsenko  and
Tuomas Kiiski
Daria Gritsenko
Affiliation:
Aleksanteri Institute, P.O. Box 42 (Unioninkatu 33), 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland ([email protected])
Tuomas Kiiski
Affiliation:
Turku School of Economics, Operations and Supply Chain management, Rehtorinpellonkatu 3, 20014 University of Turku, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, interest in the economic potential of the Arctic has been mounting, facilitated by environmental developments caused by climate change. In this context, the viability of shipping in Arctic waters is pivotal. This article explores the interplay of market considerations and the non-market drivers (climatic, navigational and political components) regarding the viability of the most prominent Arctic shipping route, the northern sea route (NSR), as a global shipping route. In particular, it concentrates on the Russian ice-breaking tariff policy on the NSR and presents a review from 1991, when the route was officially opened to international shipping, until 2014. The study integrates qualitative and longitudinal quantitative data related to NSR traffic, ice-breaking tariffs and ice conditions. The paper shows that the ice-breaking fees play a key role for the functioning of the NSR by providing a source of funding for the ice-breaking fleet, which constitutes a basis for safe shipping. However, the development of the NSR into a competitive transcontinental shipping route is determined by a dynamic mixture of factors in which the Russian ice-breaking fee represents an additional cost item for shipping companies and shippers. It is argued that the development of ice-breaking tariff policy has been guided by structural changes in external factors consequently influencing the demand for ice-breaking services (a derivative of NSR demand), which limits the extent to which tariff policy influences the attractiveness of the NSR in a global context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 144 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalto, P., Dusseault, D., Kivinen, M. and Kennedy, M.. 2012. How are Russian energy policies formulated? Linking actors and structures of energy policy. In: Aalto, P. (editor). Russia's energy policies: national, interregional and global levels. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 20–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AARI (Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute). 2014. Operational data. St Petersburg: AARI. URL: www.aari.ru (accessed 10 October 2014).Google Scholar
Arbo, P., Iversen, A., Knol, M., Ringholm, T. and Sander, G.. 2013. Arctic futures: conceptualizations and images of a changing Arctic. Polar Geography 36 (3): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment). 2005. Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
AMSA (Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment). 2009. Arctic marine shipping assessment 2009 report. Arctic Council (April 2009).Google Scholar
Armstrong, T. 1952. The northern sea route: Soviet exploitation of the north east passage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blunden, M. 2012. Geopolitics and the northern sea route. International Affairs 88: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondareff, J.M. 2014. The melting Arctic ice cap presents opportunities for shipping, mineral development, cooperation, and conflict. Marine Resources Committee Newsletter 17 (1). URL: http://www.blankrome.com/siteFiles/Publications/A25DA40EE816F8FE53A546E51AD1556E.pdf (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Buyanov, A. 2004. Formirovanie tarifnoy sistemy ledokolnogo opbespecheniya Severnogo morskogo puti. [Formulation of ice–breaking tariff system at the northern sea route]. Unpublished PhD dissertation. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University for Waterborne Transport.Google Scholar
Coen, R. 2012. Breaking ice for Arctic oil: the epic voyage of the SS ‘Manhattan’ through the northwest passage. Fairbanks University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Doyban, V., Batskih, J. and Luzin, G.. 1995. Severnyi Morskoi Put’ I Rynochnaia Ekonomika: Novye Vozmozhnosti dlia Razvitiia.[Northern sea route and market economy: new possibilities for development]. Apatity: KOLA.Google Scholar
Eger, K.M., Mejlænder–Larsen, M. and Wergeland, T.. 2013. Shipping and Arctic infrastructure. In: Østreng, W., Eger, K.M., Fløistad, B., Jørgensen–Dahl, A., Lothe, L., Mejlænder–Larsen, M. and Wergeland, T. (editors). A comparison of the northeast, northwest and trans polar passages. Chichester, UK: Springer–Praxis: 177–240.Google Scholar
Eilertsen, H., 2014. New Russian icebreakers ready to operate from 2017. High North News 12.8.2014. URL: http://www.highnorthnews.com/new-russian-icebreakers->ready-to-operate-in-2017/ (accessed 11 October 2014).ready-to-operate-in-2017/+(accessed+11+October+2014).>Google Scholar
Federal Tariff Service. 2005. Decree of the Federal Tariff Service of the Russian Federation N322 from 26 July 2005 ‘On setting tariffs for ice-breaking fleet services on the Northern Sea Route’. [Prikaz Federalnoy sluzhby po tarifam N322 ot 26 Iyulya 2005 goda ‘Ob ustanovlenii tarifov na uslugi ledokol’nogo flota na trassax severnogo morskogo puti’].Rossiyskaya Gazeta N221 (3890) 4 October 2005.Google Scholar
Federal Tariff Service. 2011. Decree of the Federal Tariff Service of the Russian Federation N 122-t/1 from 07 June 2011 ‘On setting tariffs for ice-breaking fleet services on the Northern Sea Route’ [Prikaz Federalnoy sluzhby po tarifam N 122/1 ot 26 Iynya 2011 goda ‘Ob ustanovlenii tarifov na uslugi ledokol’nogo flota na trassax severnogo morskogo puti’]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta N138, 29 June 2011.Google Scholar
Federal Tariff Service. 2014. Decree of the Federal Tariff Service of the Russian Federation N 46-t/2 from 04 March 2014 ‘On setting tariffs for ice-breaking fleet services on the Northern Sea Route’ [Prikaz Federalnoy sluzhby po tarifam N 46/2 ot 04 Marta 2014 goda ‘Ob ustanovlenii tarifov na uslugi ledokol’nogo flota na trassax severnogo morskogo puti’]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta N 6367, 25 April 2014.Google Scholar
Gel’man, V. 2012. Subversive institutions, informal governance, and contemporary Russian politics. Communist andpost–Communist Studies, disintegration of the Soviet Union. Twenty years later assessment. Quo Vadis? 45: 295–303.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goncharov, A. 2011. Osvoenie Severnogo morskogo puti: konec XIX– nachalo XX vv. [Development of the NSR during the late19th – early 20th centuries]. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Goskomtsen USSR. 1989. Decree of the Goskomtsen USSR N 274 from 27 March 1989. ‘Price-Current II-01 Tariffs on transportationof goods by sea’ [Postanovlenie Goskomtsen SSSR N 274 ot 27 Marta 1989 goda ‘Preyskurant II-01 tarify na perevozki gruzov morskim transportom’]. The Library of the Normative and Legal Acts of the USSR (online). URL: http://www.libussr.ru/doc_ussr/usr_15519.htm.Google Scholar
Granberg, A.G. 1998. The northern sea route: trends and prospects of commercial use. Ocean and Coastal Management 4: 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granberg, A.G. 1992. International economic cooperation along the northern sea route. In: Simonsen H. (editor). Proceedings from the northern sea route expert meeting, 13–14 October 1992. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute: 153–166.Google Scholar
Harsem, Ø., Heen, K., Rodrigues, J.M.P. and Vassdal, T.. 2015. Oil exploration and sea ice projections in the Arctic. Polar Record 51: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L., Lasserre, F. and Alexeeva, O.. 2014. Is China's interest for the Arctic driven by Arctic shipping potential? Asian Geographer in press. doi: 10.1080/10225706.2014.928785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Chamber of Shipping. 2014. Arctic shipping: position paper. London: ISC.Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H.L. (editors). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press (Contribution of Working Group I to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1–18.Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Summary for policymakers. In: Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R. and White, L.L. (editors). Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press (Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change):1–32.Google Scholar
Isakov, N., Yakovlev, A., Nikulin, A., Serebryansky, G. and Patrakova, T.. 1999. Potential cargo flow analysis and economic evaluation for the simulation study. Lysaker: International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP working paper 139).Google Scholar
Kiiski, T. 2014a. The dynamics of world ice–classed bulk and containership fleet in view of Arctic shipping. In: Gammelgaard, B., Prockl, G., Kinra, A., Aastrup, J., Andreasen, P. Holm, Schramm, H-J., Hsuan, J., Malouf, M. and Wieland, A. (editors). Proceedings of Nordic logistics research network (NOFOMA) conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 12–13 June 2014. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School: 856–868.Google Scholar
Kiiski, T. 2014b. The economic viability of northern sea route as a seasonal supplement for container shipping between Europe and Asia. In: Martínez de Osés, F.X. and Castells i Sanabra, M. (editors). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Maritime Transport, Barcelona, Spain, 25–27 June 2014. Barcelona: Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya: 453–468.Google Scholar
Klimenko, E. 2014. Russia's evolving arctic strategy: drivers, challenges and new opportunities. Stockholm: SIPRIP (policy paper 42). URL: http://books.sipri.org/files/PP/SIPRIPP42.pdf (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. and Pelletier, S.. 2011. Polar super seaways? Maritime transport in the Arctic: an analysis of shipowners’ intentions. Journal of Transport Geography 19: 1465–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasserre, F. 2014. Case studies of shipping along Arctic routes. Analysis and profitability perspectives for the container sector. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 66: 144–161.Google Scholar
Liu, M. and Kronbak, J.. 2010. The potential economic viability of using the northern sea route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe. Journal of Transport Geography 18: 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhaylichenko, V. 2012. Commentaries: Russian perspective. Potential arctic shipping. In: Young, O.R., Kim, J.D., and Kim, Y.H. (editors). The Arctic in world affairs: a north pacific dialogue on Arctic marine issues. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute (2012 North pacific arctic conference proceedings. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute; Honolulu: East-West Center): 71– 81.Google Scholar
Ministry of Economic Development and Trade. 2003. Decree of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation N6 from 10 January 2003 ‘On changing tariffs for ice-breaking fleet services on the Northern Sea Route’ [Prikaz Ministertva Ekonomicheskogo Razvitiya I Torgovli Rossiyskoy Federatsii N6 ot 10 Yanvarya 2003 goda ‘Ob izmenenii tarifov na uslugi ledokol’nogo flota na trassax severnogo morskogo puti’]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta N197 from 1 March 2003.Google Scholar
Moe, A. and Jensen, O.. 2010. Opening of new Arctic shipping routes. DG External Policies, European Parliament. Brussels: AFET.Google Scholar
North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NSRA (Northern Sea Route Administration). 2014. The federal law of shipping on the water area of the northern sea route. URL: http://www.nsra.ru/en/zakon_o_smp/ (accessed 12 November 2014). Rossiyskaya Gazeta N5845, 30 July 2012.Google Scholar
NSRIO (Northern Sea Route Information Office). 2014. Transit statistics. Murmansk/Kirkenes: Northern Sea Route Information Office. URL: http://www.arctic-lio.com/ (accessed 20 April 2014).Google Scholar
Olesen, M.R. 2014. After Ukraine: keeping the Arctic stable. DIIS policy brief September 2014. Copenhagen: DIIS. URL: http://www.diis.dk/files/media/publications/publikationer_2014/diis-policybrief-keeping-the-arctic-stable-web.pdf (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Overland, J.E., Wang, M., Walsh, J. and Stroeve, J.. 2014. Future Arctic climate changes: adaptation and mitigation time scales. Earth's Future 2: 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, V., Glukhareva, E. and Kutsenko, S.. 2011. Prospects of the Russian Arctic transport system development. In: Chung, J.S., Hong, S. Y., Langen, I., Prinsenberg, S.J. (editors). Proceedings of the 21st international offshore and polar engineering conference (Maui, Hawaii, USA, June 19–24, 2011): 1136–1139. Cupertino: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE). URL: http://www.isope.org/publications/proceedings/ISOPE/ISOPE%202011/start.htm (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Peresypkin, V. and Yakovlev, A.. 2008, The northern sea route's role in the system of international transport corridors. Focus North 2–2008. The Norwegian Atlantic Committee. URL: http://www.atlanterhavskomiteen.no/files/atlanterhavskomiteen.no/Documents/Publikasjoner/Fokus%20Nord/FN%202-2008.pdf (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Pullen, T. and Swithinbank, C.. 1991. Transits of the northwest passage, 1906–90. Polar Record 27: 365–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putin, V. 2011. The Arctic: territory of dialogue. (Opening speech to the Second International Arctic Forum in Arkhangelsk (Russia), 22 September 2011). Moscow: Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Official website. URL: http://archive.premier.gov.ru/eng/events/news/16536/ (accessed 15 November 2014).Google Scholar
Ragner, C. 2000a. Northern sea route cargo flows and infrastructure – present state and future potential. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute (FNI report 13).Google Scholar
Ragner, C. 2000b. The northern sea route – commercial potential, economic significance and infrastructure requirements. Post–Soviet Geography and Economics 41: 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragner, C. 2008. Den norra sjövägen. [The northern sea route]. In: Hallberg, T. (editor). Barents – ett gränsland i Norden [Barents – a borderland in the north]. Stockholm: Arena Norden: 114–127.Google Scholar
Ruksha, V., Smirnov, A., Kashka, M. and Babich, N.. 2011. Northern sea route. Russian nuclear ice–breaking fleet and the perspectives of the NSR development. Arktika: Ecologiya i Ekonomica [Arctic: Ecology and Economy] 1: 52–61.Google Scholar
Russian Arctic Strategy 2020. 2009. Foundations of the Russian Federation's state policy in the Arctic until 2020 and beyond. URL: http://icr.arcticportal.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1791%3 (accessed 18 September 2014). Rossiyskaya Gazeta N 4877, 27 March 2009.Google Scholar
Sander, G., Gille, J., Stepien, A., Koivurova, T., Thomas, J., Gascardand, J–C. and Justus, D.. 2014. Changes in Arctic maritime transport. Strategic assessment of development of the Arctic. (Assessment conducted for the European Union). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Sarrabezolesa, A., Lasserre, F. and Hagouagn’rin, Z.. 2014. Arctic shipping insurance: towards a harmonisation of practices andcosts? Polar Record doi: 10.1017/S0032247414000552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schøyen, H. and Bråthen, S.. 2011. The northern sea route versus the Suez canal: cases from bulk shipping. Journal of Transport Geography. 19: 977–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selin, V. and Istomin, A.. 2003. Ekonomika severnogo morskogo puti: instoricheskie tendentsii, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy [Economy of the northern sea route: historical trends, present condition, prospects.] Apatity: KOLA.Google Scholar
Sherman, T.A. 1969. The economics of shipping in polar seas. Polar Record 14: 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintsov, A. 2004. Sever v sisteme geopoliticheskix koordinat sovremennoj Rossii [The north in the system of contemporary Russian geopolitical coordinates]. Moscow: Gorodets.Google Scholar
Skaridov, A. 2014. Arctic marine shipping – Russian scenarios. Tromsø: High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment.(Presentation at the Arctic frontiers conference in Tromsø(Norway), 24 January 2014). URL: http://www.arcticfrontiers.com/arctic-frontiers/archive/2014-conference/downloads/conference-presentations-3/friday-24-january-2014/part-iii-a-iv-shipping-a-offshore-in-the-arctic (accessed 24 March 2015).Google Scholar
Stephenson, S.L., Smith, , Brigham, L. and Agnew, J.. 2013. Projected 21st–century changes to arctic marine access. Climatic Change 118: 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushakov, A.P. 2000. The real face of northern sea route shipping. In: Ragner, C.L. (editor). The 21st century – turning point for the northern sea route? (Proceedings of the northern sea route user conference, Oslo, 18–20 November 1999). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer–Science+Business Media, B.V: 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderZwaag, D. and Lamson, C.. 1990. Challenge of Arctic shipping: science, environmental assessment, and human values. Montreal: McGill–Queen's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verevkin, V. 2012. Icebreakers in the far east of Russia and in the Arctic. Asia–Pacific Journal of Marine Science and Education 2: 91–95.Google Scholar
Wergeland, T. 1992. The northern sea route – rosy prospects for commercial shipping? International Challenges 12: 43–57.Google Scholar
Verny, J. and Grigentin, C.. 2009. Container shipping on the northern sea route. International Journal of Production Economics 122: 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vizcarra, N. 2014. Arctic Sea ice reaches minimum extent for 2014. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center. URL: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2014/09/arctic-minimum-reached/ (accessed 11 November 2014).Google Scholar
Williams, A., O’Sullivan, D. and Wilkinson, A.. 2011. The future of Arctic enterprise: long–term outlook and implications. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilson Center. 2013. Opportunities and challenges for arctic oil and gas development. (Eurasia Group report). Washington, DC. The Wilson Center. URL: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Artic%20Report_F2.pdf (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Yakovlev, A., Semanov, G., Ivanov, Y., Ushakov, A., Zubarev, S., Gavrilo, M., Khlebovitch, V., Moe, K.A., Thomassen, J. and Brude, O.W.. 1999. The NSR simulation study work package 7: legal and environmental evaluation of the routes selected for the insrop simulation study. Lysaker: International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP working paper 128).Google Scholar
Østreng, W. 1991. Den nordlige sjørute: en ny æra i sovjetisk politikk? Økonomiske folkerettslige og sikkerhetspolitiskeaspekter. [The northern sea route: a new era in Soviet policy? Economic, legal and security aspects]. Den norske Atlanterhavskomite. Oslo: Det sikkerhetspolitiske bibliotek.Google Scholar
Østreng, W. 2012. Shipping and resources in the Arctic Ocean: a hemispheric perspective. In: Heininen, L., Exner–Pirot, H. and Plouffe, J. (editors). Arctic yearbook 2012. Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.Google Scholar
Østreng, W., Eger, K.M., Fløistad, B., Jørgensen–Dahl, A., Lothe, L., Mejlænder–Larsen, M. and Wergeland, T.. 2013. Shipping in Arctic waters. A comparison of the northeast, northwest and trans polar passages. Chichester, UK: Springer–Praxis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar