Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:05:40.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology and infraciliature of some soil ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from continental Antarctica, with notes on the morphogenesis of Sterkiella histriomuscorum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Wolfgang Petz  and
Wilhelm Foissner
Wolfgang Petz
Affiliation:
Universität Salzburg, Institut für Zoologie, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
Wilhelm Foissner
Affiliation:
Universität Salzburg, Institut für Zoologie, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The morphology of seven soil ciliate species from continental Antarctica was investigated using live observation and protargol impregnation. Observations on two populations of Protospathidium serpens corroborate the view that this species usually has a single, more-or-less nodular, macronucleus distinguishing it from P. muscicola, which possesses 10–30 nodules. The Antarctic specimens of Protospathidium terricola differ inconspicuously from the type population in that they are slightly larger, have fewer ciliary rows (17 vs 21), and the fragments of the circumoral kinety are less distinctly separated from each other. Spathidium seppelti nov. spec, resembles 5. bavariense, but has 100–200 macronuclear nodules and a conical depression in the dorsal third of the oral bulge. Odontochlamys wisconsinensis nov. comb, (basionym: Chilodonella wisconsinensis Kahl, 1931) has four right field kineties and an oral basket consisting of 14 rods; the dorsal brush is near the anterior margin and usually consists of four cilia. The Antarctic population of Pseudochilodonopsis mutabilis possesses a regular dorsal hump and only 12–14 (about 15 in Austrian type population) phary ngeal rods. Oxytricha opisthomuscorum has six dorsal kineties with long cilia and a buccal cirrus near the anterior end of the paroral membrane. The Antarctic specimens of Sterkiella histriomuscorum have fïve transverse cirri. Their morphogenesis differs slightly from that of a population having four transverse cirri in that the daughter's anlagen are more distinctly separated and some temporal sequences are different.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 33 , Issue 187 , October 1997 , pp. 307 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekperov, I.K. 1983. Ciliates of pelogen in rearing ponds of the Kura experimental sturgeon hatchery. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 62 (3): 331–338.Google Scholar
André, E. 1916. Contribution a I'étude de la faune infusorienne du Léman. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 24: 621–634.Google Scholar
Augustin, H., and Foissner, W.. 1992. Morphologie und Ökologie einiger Ciliaten (Protozoa: Ciliophora) aus dem Belebtschlamm. Archiv für Protistenkunde 141 (4): 243–283.Google Scholar
Bamforth, S., Freckman, D., and Virginia, R.. 1993. Soil protozoa of the Antarctic polar desert. IX International Congress of Protozoology, Berlin, Germany, Abstracts. Berlin: German Society of Protozoology: 8 (Abstract 021).Google Scholar
Berger, H., and Foissner, W.. 1987. Morphology and biometry of some soil hypotrichs (Protozoa: Ciliophora). Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie 114 (2): 193–239.Google Scholar
Berger, H., and Foissner, W.. 1989. Morphology and biometry of some soil hypotrichs (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Europe and Japan. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology) 55: 19–46.Google Scholar
Berger, H., and Foissner, W.. 1997. Cladistic relationships and generic characterization of oxytrichid hypotrichs (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Archiv für Protistenkunde 148 (1–2): 125–155.Google Scholar
Berger, H., Foissner, W., and Adam, H.. 1984. Taxonomie, Biometrie und Morphogenese einiger terricoler Ciliaten (Protozoa: Ciliophora). Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie 111 (3): 339–367.Google Scholar
Berger, H., Foissner, W., and Adam, H.. 1985. Morphological variation and comparative analysis of morphogenesis in Parakahliella macrostoma (Foissner, 1982) nov.gen. and Histriculusmuscorum(Kahl, 1932) (Ciliophora, Hypotrichida). Protistologica 21 (3): 295–311.Google Scholar
Blatterer, H., and Foissner, W.. 1992. Morphology and infraciliature of some cyrtophorid ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from freshwater and soil. Archiv für Protistenkunde 142 (3–4): 101–118.Google Scholar
Blume, H.-P., and Bolter, M.. 1993. Soils of Casey Station (Wilkes Land, Antarctica). Joint Russian–American seminar on cryopedology and global change: postseminar proceedings. Pushchino: Russian Academy of Science: 96–103.Google Scholar
Blume, H.-P., and Bölter, M.. 1996. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Boden- und Vegetationsentwicklung in der Kontinentalen Antarktis. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 25: 25–34.Google Scholar
Borror, A.C. 1972. Revision of the order Hypotrichida(Ciliophora, Protozoa). Journal of Protozoology 19 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Broady, P.A. 1989. Survey of algae and other terrestrial biota at Edward VII Peninsula, Marie Byrd Land. Antarctic Science 1 (3): 215–224.Google Scholar
Buitkamp, U. 1977. Die Ciliatenfauna der Savanne von Lamto (Elfenbeinküste). Acta Protozoologica 16: 249–276.Google Scholar
Certes, A. 1891. Note sur deux infusoires nouveaux des environs de Paris. Mémoires Société Zoologique de France 4: 536–541.Google Scholar
Corliss, J.O. 1979. The ciliated protozoa: characterization, classification and guide to the literature. Second edition. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dragesco, J. 1970. Ciltés libres du Cameroun. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences du Université Fédérale du Cameroun (Numéro hors-série): 1–141.Google Scholar
Dragesco, J., and Dragesco-Kernéis, A.. 1979. Cilies muscicoles nouveaux ou peu connus. Acta Protozoologica 18 (3): 401–416.Google Scholar
Dragesco, J., and Dragesco-Kenéis, A.. 1986. Ciliés libres de I'Afrique intertropicale. Faune Tropicale XXVI. Paris: Éditions de I'Orstom.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G. 1838. Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen. Leipzig: Voβ.Google Scholar
Finlay, B.J. 1982. Procedures for the isolation, cultivation and identification of protozoa. In: Burns, R.G., and Slater, J.H. (eds). Experimental microbial ecology. Oxford: Blackwell: 44–65.Google Scholar
Flint, E.A., and Stout, J.D.. 1960. Microbiology of some soils from Antarctica. Nature 188 (4752): 767–768.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1980. Taxonomische Studien über die Ciliaten des Grossglocknergebietes (Hohe Tauern, Österreich). IX. Ordnungen Heterotrichida und Hypotrichida. Berichte der Naturwissenschaftlich-Medizinischen Vereinigung in Salzburg 5: 71–117.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1981. Morphologie und Taxonomie einiger neuer und wenig bekannter kinetofragminophorer Ciliaten (Protozoa: Ciliophora) aus alpinen Böden. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie 108 (2): 264–297.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1982. Ökologie und Taxonomie der Hypotrichida (Protozoa: Ciliophora) einiger osterreichischer Böden. Archiv für Protistenkunde 126 (1): 19–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foissner, W. 1984. Infraciliatur, Silberliniensystem und Biometrie einiger neuer und wenig bekannter terrestrischer, limnischer und mariner Ciliaten (Protozoa: Ciliophora) aus den Klassen Kinetofragminophora, Colpodea und Polyhymenophora. Stapfia (Linz) 12: 1–165.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1987. Neueterrestrische und limnische Ciliaten (Protozoa, Ciliophora) aus Österreich und Deutschland. Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung / 195 (6–10): 217–268.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1988. Taxonomie und Okologie einiger Ciliaten (Protozoa, Ciliophora) des Saprobiensystems. II. Familie Chilodonellidae. Hydrobiologia 162: 21–45.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1989. Morphologie und Infraciliatur einiger neuer und wenig bekannter terrestrischer und limnischer Ciliaten (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung /196 (5–10): 173–247.Google Scholar
Foissner, W. 1996. Faunistics, taxonomy and ecology of moss and soil ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Antarctica, with description of new species, including Pleuroplitoides smithi nov. gen., nov. spec. Acta Protozoologica 35 (2): 95–123.Google Scholar
Foissner, W.In press. An updated compilation of world soil ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora), with ecological notes, new records, and descriptions of new species. European Journal of Protistology.Google Scholar
Foissner, W., and Adam, H.. 1983. Morphologie und Morphogenesedes Bodenciliaten Oxytrichagranulifera sp. n. (Ciliophora, Oxytrichidae). Zoologica Scripta 12 (1): 1–11Google Scholar
Foissner, W., and Didier, P.. 1981. Morphologie und Infraciliatur einiger kinetofragminophorer und hypotricher Ciliaten aus den Flieβgewässern von Besseen-Chandesse (Frankreich). Annales de la Station Biologique de Besse-en-Chandesse 15: 254–275.Google Scholar
Foissner, W., Blatterer, H., Berger, H., and Kohmann, F.. 1991. Taxonomische und ökologische Revision der Ciliaten des Saprobiensystems-Band|: Cyrtophorida, Oligotrichida, Hypotrichia, Colpodea. Informationsberichte des Bayerischen Landesamtes für Wasserwirtschaft 1/91: 1–478.Google Scholar
Gellért, J. 1955. Die Ciliaten des sich unter der Flechte Parmelia saxatilis Mass. gebildeten Humus. Acta Biologica Hungarica 6 (1–2): 77–111.Google Scholar
Hemberger, H. 1982. Revision der Ordnung Hypotrichida Stein (Ciliophora, Protozoa) an Hand von Protargolpräparaten und Morphogenesedarstellungen. Unpublished PhD thesis. Bonn: Mathematischnaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Kahl, A. 1930a. Urtiere oder Protozoa I: Wimpertiere oder Ciliata (Infusoria) 1. Allgemeiner Teil und Prostomata. Tierwelt Deutschlands 18: 1–180.Google Scholar
Kahl, A. 1930b. Neue und ergänzende Beobachtungenholotricher Infusorien. II. Archiv für Protistenkunde 70: 313–416.Google Scholar
Kahl, A. 1931. Urtiere oder Protozoa I: Wimpertiere oder Ciliata (Infusoria) 2. Holotricha auBer den im 1. Teil behandelten Prostomata. Tierwelt Deutschlands 21: 181–398.Google Scholar
Kahl, A. 1932. Urtiere oder Protozoa. I: Wimpertiere oder Ciliata (Infusoria) 3. Spirotricha. Tierwelt Deutschlands 25: 399–650.Google Scholar
Lewis Smith, R.I. 1986. Plant ecological studies in the fellfield ecosystem near Casey Sation, Australian Antarctic Territory, 1985–86. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin 72: 81–91.Google Scholar
Nieto, J.J., Calvo, P., Martin, J., and Torres, A.. 1984. Divisional and regenerative morphogenesis in the hypotrich ciliate, Histriculussp. Acta Protozoologica 23 (4): 187–195.Google Scholar
Paul, E., Stuwe, K., Teasdale, J., and Worley, B.. 1995. Structural and metamorphic geology of the Windmill Islands, East Antarctica: field evidence for repeated tectonothermal activity. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 42: 453–469.Google Scholar
Petz, W. 1997. Ecology of the active soil microfauna(Protozoa, Metazoa) of Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. Polar Biology 18: 33–44.Google Scholar
Petz, W., and Foissner, W.. 1996. Morphology and morphogenesis of Lamtostyla edaphoni Berger and Foissner and Onychodromopsis flexilis Stokes, two hypotrichs (Protozoa: Ciliophora) from Antarctic soils. Acta Protozoologica 35 (4): 257–280.Google Scholar
Pomp, R., and Wilbert, N.. 1988. Taxonomie and ecological studies of ciliates from Australian saline soils: colpodids and hymenostomate ciliates. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 39: 479–495.Google Scholar
Reuter, J. 1961. Einige faunistische und ökologische Beobachtungen über Felsentümpel-Ziliaten. Acta Zoologica Fennica 99: 4–42.Google Scholar
Roser, D.J., Seppelt, R.D., and Ashbolt, N.. 1993. Microbiology of omithogenic soils from the Windmill Islands, Budd Coast, continental Antarctica: microbial biomass distribution. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25 (2): 165–175.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G., Watkins, B.P., Smith, R.I. Lewis, Dastych, H., Eicker, A., Foissner, W., Heatwole, H., Miller, W.R., and Thompson, G.. 1989. Biological survey of Robertskollen, western Dronning Maud Land: area description and preliminary species lists. South African Journal of Antarctic Research 19 (1): 10–20.Google Scholar
Smith, H.G. 1978. The distribution and ecology of terrestrial protozoa of sub-Antarctic and maritime Antarctic islands. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports 95: 1–104.Google Scholar
Song, W., and Wilbert, N.. 1989. Taxonomische Untersuchungen an Aufwuchsciliaten (Protozoa, Ciliophora) im Poppelsdorfer Weiher, Bonn. Lauterbornia 3: 2–221.Google Scholar
Srámek-Husek, R. 1954. Neue und wenig bekannte Ciliaten aus der Tschechoslowakei und ihre Stellung im Saprobiensystem. Archiv für Protistenkunde 100: 246–267.Google Scholar
Stokes, A.C. 1891. Notes of some new infusoria from the fresh waters of the United States. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society year 1891: 697–704.Google Scholar
Sudzuki, M. 1964. On the microfauna of the Antarctic region. I. Moss-water community at Langhovde. Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition Scientific Reports, Series E 19: 1–41.Google Scholar
Sudzuki, M. 1979. On the microfauna of the Antarctic region. III. Microbiota of the terrestrial interstices. Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research, Special Issue 11: 104–126.Google Scholar
Sudzuki, M., and Shimoizumi, J.. 1967. On the fresh-water microfaunaof the Antarctic region. II. Stability of faunisticcomposition of Antarctic microorganisms. Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition Scientific Reports 1: 216–235.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.C. Jr, 1965. Pseudocohnilembuslongisetus, a hymenostome ciliate from Antarctica. Virginia Journal of Science 16: 165–169.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.C. Jr, 1972. Ciliated protozoa of the Antarctic Peninsula. Antarctic Research Series 20: 261–288.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.C. Jr, and Croom, J.M.. 1978. Systematics and ecology of ciliated protozoa from King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Antarctic Research Series 27: 40–67.Google Scholar
Vuxanovici, A. 1959. Contributii la studiul unor infuzori holotrichi. Studii si Cercetari de Biologie 11 (4): 307–335.Google Scholar
Vuxanovici, A. 1962a. Contributii la sistematica ciliatelor (Nota I). Studii si Cercetari de Biologie, Seria Biologie Animala 14 (2): 197–215.Google Scholar
Vuxanovici, A. 1962b. Contributii la sistematica ciliatelor (Nota II). Studii si Cercetari de Biologie, Seria Biologie Animala 14: 331–349.Google Scholar
Vuxanovici, A. 1962c. Contributii la sistematica ciliatelor (Nota III). Studii si Cercetari de Biologie, Seria Biologie Animala 14: 549–573.Google Scholar
Wenzel, F. 1953. Die Ciliaten der Moosrasen trockner Standorte. Archiv für Protistenkunde 99: 70–141.Google Scholar
Wilbert, N. 1975. Eine verbesserte Technik der Protargolimprägnation für Ciliaten. Mikrokosmos 64 (6): 171–179.Google Scholar
Wirnsberger, E., Foissner, W., and Adam, H.. 1985. Morphological, biometric, and morphogenetic comparison of two closely related species, Stylonychia vorax and S. pustulata(Ciliophora: Oxytrichidae). Journal of Protozoology 32 (2): 261–268.Google Scholar
Zou, S.-F., and Zhang, Z.-R.. 1992. Morphology and morphogenesis of Histriculus muscorum Kahl. Acta Zoologica Sinica 38 (4): 345–351.Google Scholar