Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:23:48.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ministerial directives and constitutional development in the Yukon Territory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Steven Smyth
Steven Smyth
Affiliation:
77 Kluane Gescent, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 3G9Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews the role that ministerial directives played in shaping the constitutional development of the Yukon Territory 1970–85. These were years of dramatic change, with the form of government shifting from autocratic bureaucracy to responsible democracy. The instrument for this change was the ministerial directive, an order from the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs to the Commissioner, sanctioned by Section 4 of the Yukon Act. The fact that the head of government is the Commissioner, a senior federal public servant, was key to the process.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 26 , Issue 156 , January 1990 , pp. 7 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elliott, D. W. 1978. Some constitutional aspects of the government of the Yukon Territory. Whitehorse: Government of Yukon.Google Scholar
Hillson, J. D. 1973. Constitutional development in the Yukon Territory. M. A. thesis, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Moody-Michael, J. 1987. From Sissons to Meyer: the administrative development of the Yukon Government, 1948–1979. Whitehorse, Government of Yukon, 1987.Google Scholar
Yukon Legislative Assembly. 1977. Standing Committee on Rules, Elections and Privileges, Special Report, 29 November. Whitehorse, Government of Yukon.Google Scholar
Zaslow, M. 1967. Recent constitutional development in Canada's Northern Territories. Canadian Public Administration 10: 167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar