Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:57:57.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local participation and partnership development in Canada's Arctic research: challenges and opportunities in an age of empowerment and self-determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2016

Nicolas D. Brunet ,
Gordon M. Hickey  and
Murray M. Humphries
Nicolas D. Brunet
Affiliation:
Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, McGill University, Stewart Biology Building, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montréal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada ([email protected])
Gordon M. Hickey
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada
Murray M. Humphries
Affiliation:
Centre for Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Ste.-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An important component of northern research in Canada has been a strong emphasis on local participation. However, the policy and permit landscape for community participation therein is heterogeneous and presents specific challenges in promoting effective partnerships between researchers and local participants. We conducted a survey of northern research stakeholders across Canada in order better to understand the benefits and challenges associated with research partnerships with a view to informing northern research policy and practice. We found that local engagement at the proposal and research design phases, the hiring of community researchers and engagement of local persons at the results dissemination phase were important factors affecting success. Respondents also indicated a lack of social capital (trust and reciprocity) between researchers and communities as placing a negative impact on science partnerships. Overall, researchers were perceived to benefit more from research partnerships than their community counterparts. Partnerships in northern research will possibly require further decentralisation of power to achieve the policy objectives of local community participation. This could be achieved, in part, by allowing non-academic principal investigators to receive funding, or by involving communities in research priority-setting, proposal review and funding allocation processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , May 2016 , pp. 345 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. 1993. Vuntut Gwitchin/First Nation final agreement. Ottawa: Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada.Google Scholar
Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A. and Kitson, M.. 2009. Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. Cambridge and London: University of Cambridge and Imperial College, London.Google Scholar
College, Aurora. 1999. G.O2. Reseach and administration management policy. Inuvik: Aurora College.Google Scholar
Bennett, N., Lemelin, R.H, Koster, R. and other. 2012. A capital assets framework for appraising and building capacity for tourism development in aboriginal protected area gateway communities. Tourism Management 33: 752–766.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 2008. Sacred ecology (2nd Edn). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bocking, S. 2007. Science and spaces in the northern environment. Environmental History 12: 867–894.Google Scholar
Bogner, A. 2012. The paradox of participation experiments. Science, Technology and Human Values 37 (5): 506–527.Google Scholar
Brunet, N.D., Hickey, G.M. and Humphries, M.M.. 2014a. The evolution of local participation and the mode of knowledge production in Arctic research. Ecology and Society 19 (2): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, N.D., Hickey, G.M. and Humphries, M.M.. 2014b. Understanding community-researcher partnerships in the natural sciences: a case study from the Arctic. Journal of Rural Studies 36:247–261.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Chitty, D. and Elton, C.. 1937. Canadian Arctic wild life enquiry, 1935–36. Journal of Animal Ecology 6: 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, B.C.K. and Pak, A.W.P.. 2005. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Preventing Chronic Diseases 2 (1): A13.Google Scholar
Christopher, S. 2005. Recommendations for conducting successful research with Native Americans. Journal of Cancer Education 20 (1 suppl): 47–51.Google Scholar
Christopher, S., Watts, V., McCormick, A.K.H.G. and other. 2008. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health 98 (8): 1398–1406.Google Scholar
Chylek, P., Hengartner, N., Lesins, G. and others. 2014. Isolating the anthropogenic component of Arctic warming . Geophysical Research Letters 41 (10): 3569–3576.Google Scholar
Cuerrier, A., Downing, A., Jonhston, J. and others. 2012. Our plants, our land: bridging aboriginal generations through cross-cultural plant workshops. Polar Geography 35 (3–4): 195–210.Google Scholar
Cultural Services Branch, Department of Tourism and Culture, Government of Yukon. 2008. Guidebook on scientific research in the Yukon. URL: http://www.tc.gov.yk.ca/publications/Guidebook_on_Scientific_Research_2013.pdf (accessed 9 August 2014).Google Scholar
Davidson-Hunt, I. J. and O'Flaherty, R.M.. 2007. Researchers, indigenous peoples, and place-based learning communities. Society and Natural Resources 20 (4): 291–305.Google Scholar
Dutheil, A., Tester, F., and Konek, J.. 2013. Unequal exchange: western economic logic and Inuit/Qablunaat research relationships. Polar Record 51 (2): 140–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P.A. and Ball, T.J.. 2003. Tribal participatory research: mechanisms of a collaborative model. American Journal of Community Psychology 32 (3–4): 207–216.Google Scholar
Folz, D. H. 1996. Survey research for public administration. Sage, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. D. and Pearce, T.. 2010. What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: a systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters 5 (1): 014008.Google Scholar
Garnett, S.T., Crowley, G.M., Hunter-Xenie, H. and others. 2009. Transformative knowledge transfer through empowering and paying community researchers. Biotropica 41 (5): 571–577.Google Scholar
Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T. and Diment, K.. 2005. Different cultures, different perspectives: the experiences of academic and government researchers in R & D centres. URL: http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/6 (accessed 8 August 2014).Google Scholar
Gearheard, S. and Shirley, J.. 2007. Challenges in community-research relationships: Learning from natural science in Nunavut. Arctic 60 (1): 62–74.Google Scholar
George, L.S., Fulop, M. and Wickham, L.. 2007. Building capacity of environmental health services at the local and national levels with the 10–essential–services framework. Journal of Environmental Health 70 (1): 17–20.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M. 1999. Science's new social contract with society. Nature 402: C81–C84.Google Scholar
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L.. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Graham, J. and Fortier, E.. 2005. From opportunity to action: a progress report on Canada's renewal of northern research. Ottawa: Institute on Governance.Google Scholar
Grimble, R. and Wellard, K.. 1997. Stakeholders methodologies in natural resources management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55 (2): 173–193.Google Scholar
Grimwood, B.S.R., Cuerrier, A., and Doubleday, N.C.. 2008. Arctic community engagement during the 2007–2008 International Polar Year. Polar Geography 35: 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A., Sulaiman, V.R., Clark, N. and other. 2003. From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems 78: 213–241.Google Scholar
Hannah, G. 2006. Maintaining product process balance in community antipoverty initiatives. Social Work 51 (1): 9–17.Google Scholar
Hendriks, C.M. and Grin, J.. 2007. Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 (3–4): 333–350.Google Scholar
Hinzman, L.D., Bettez, N.D., Bolton, W.R. and others. 2005. Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other Arctic regions. Climatic Change 72 (3): 251–298.Google Scholar
Huskey, L., Joseph, B., Klein, D.R. and others. 2004. Modeling sustainability of Arctic communities: an interdisciplinary collaboration of researchers and local knowledge holders. Ecosystems 7: 815–828.Google Scholar
Huybers, T. and Bennett, J.. 2003. Inter–firm cooperation at nature–based tourism destinations. Journal of Socio–Economics 32: 571–587.Google Scholar
Tuttarvingat, Inuit, 2012. Major programs web page. URL: http://www.naho.ca/inuit/ (accessed 7 November 2015). URL: http://www.naho.ca/inuit/ (accessed 13 August 2014). Major programs web page. URL: http://www.naho.ca/inuit/ (accessed 7 November 2015).Google Scholar
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), and Nunavut Research Institute (NRI). 2007. Negotiating research relationships with Inuit communities: a guide for researchers. Ottawa and Iqaluit: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute.Google Scholar
Klenk, N.L. and Hickey, G.M.. 2013. How can formal research networks produce more socially robust forest science? Forest Policy and Economics 37: 44–56.Google Scholar
Klenk, N.L. and Hickey, G.M.. 2011. Government science in forestry: characteristics and policy utilization. Forest Policy and Economics 13 (1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsmo, F.L. and Graham, A.. 2002. Research in the North American north: action and reaction. Arctic 55 (4): 319–328.Google Scholar
Krupnik, I. and Jolly, D.. 2002. The earth is faster now: indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change. Fairbanks: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States (Frontiers in Polar social science).Google Scholar
Kruse, J.A., White, R.G., Epstein, H.E., and others. 2004. Modeling sustainability of Arctic communities: an interdisciplinary collaboration of researchers and local knowledge holders. Ecosystems 7 (8): 815–828.Google Scholar
Laidler, G. J. and Ikummaq, T.. 2008. Human geographies of sea ice: freeze/thaw processes around Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada. Polar Record 44: 127–153.Google Scholar
Lee, P.H. and Yu, P.L.H.. 2013. Probability models for ranking data. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pmr/index.html (accessed 7 November 2015).Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B., and Likens, G.E.. 2009. Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long–term research and monitoring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (9): 482–486.Google Scholar
Minkler, M., Blackwell, A.G., Thompson, M. and other. 2003. Community–based participatory research: implications for public health funding. America Journal of Public Health 93: 1210–1213.Google Scholar
Nickels, S., Furgal, C., Casteldon, J. and others. 2002. Putting the human face on climate change through community workshops. In:. Krupnik, I. and Jolly, D.. The earth is faster now: indigenous observations of Arctic environmental change. Fairbanks: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States (Frontiers in Polar social science).Google Scholar
Novelli, M., Schmitz, B. and Spencer, T.. 2006. Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: a UK experience. Tourism Management 27: 1141–1152.Google Scholar
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M.. 2003. 'Mode 2' revisited: the new production of knowledge – Introduction. Minerva 41: 179–194.Google Scholar
NSERC. 2010. Northern Research Chairs Program. Ottawa, Canada: Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. URL: http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NorthernResearch-RechercheNordique/Chairholders-Chaires_eng.asp (accessed 7 November 2015).Google Scholar
OPP and BASC (Office of Polar Programs and Barrow Arctic Science Consortium). 2004. Guidelines for improved cooperation between Arctic research and northern communities. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Onyx, J., Wood, C., Bullan, P. and other. 2005. Social capital: a rural perspective. Youth Studies Australia 42 (4): 21–27.Google Scholar
Pain, R., Kesby, M. and Askins, K.. 2011. Geographies of impact: power, participation and potential. Area 43: 183–188.Google Scholar
Parlee, B. and Furgal, C.. 2012. Well–being and environmental change in the Arctic: a synthesis of selected research from Canada's International Polar Year program. Climate Change 115 (1): 13–34.Google Scholar
Pearce, T.D., Ford, J.D., Laidler, G.J. and others. 2009. Community collaboration and climate change research in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Research 28: 10–27Google Scholar
Phillipson, J., Lowe, P., Proctor, A. and other. 2012. Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. Journal of Environmental Management 95 (2): 56–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rapley, C., Bell, R., Allison, I., Bindschadler, R., Casassa, G., Chown, S., Duhaime, G., Kotlyakov, V., Kuhn, M., Orheim, O., Pandey, P.C., Petersen, H.K., Schalke, H., Janoschek, W., Sarukhanian, E. and Zhang, Z.. 2004. A framework for the International Polar Year 2007–2008. Paris: International Council for Science URL: http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:144786 (accessed 8 August 2014)Google Scholar
Rayner, N.A., Parker, D.E., Horton, E.B. and others. 2003. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres 108 (14): 2–29.Google Scholar
Real, A. and Hickey, G.H.. 2013. Publicly funded research: a participative experience from the Chilean Native Forest Research Fund. Forest Policy and Economics 37: 37–43.Google Scholar
Riedlinger, D. and Berkes, F.. 2001. Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37: 315–328.Google Scholar
Rooney, P., Steinberg, K. and Schervish, P.G.. 2004. Methodology Is destiny: the effect of survey prompts on reported levels of giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33: 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, T.H. and Lowny, K.. 2006. Social capital: building toolkit (version 1.2). Cambridge MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N, Knauper, B., Hipler, H.J. and others. 1991. Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels. Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (4): 570–582.Google Scholar
Shindell, D.T., Rind, D. and Lonergan, P.. 1998. Increased polar stratospheric ozone losses and delayed eventual recovery owing to increasing greenhouse–gas concentrations. Nature 392 (6676): 589–592.Google Scholar
Southcott, C. 2011. A vision – the future of scientific work in the Arctic in 2021. In: Shared voices. Rovaniemi, Finland: University of the Arctic. URL: http://www.uarctic.org/media/13289/Shared_Voices_Magazine_2011_screen_5JxZY.pdf (accessed 7 November 2015).Google Scholar
Sue, V.M. and Ritter, L.A.. 2012. Conducting online surveys. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 2000. Communities in the lead: power, organizational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies 37 (5–6): 1019–1035.Google Scholar
Turpin, T. and Garrett–Jones, S.. 2009. Reward, risk and response in Australian cooperative research centres. URL: http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/473 (accessed 8 August 2014).Google Scholar
Weaver, H.N. 1997. The challenges of research in native American communities: incorporating principles of cultural competence. Journal of Social Service Research 23:1–15.Google Scholar
Wolfe, B.B., Armitage, D, Wesche, S. and others. 2007. From isotopes to TK interviews: towards interdisciplinary research in Fort Resolution and the Slave River Delta, Northwest Territories. Arctic 60: 75–87.Google Scholar
Wolfe, B.B., Humphries, M.M., Pisaric, M.F.J. and others. 2011. Environmental change and traditional use of the Old Crow Flats in Northern Canada: an IPY opportunity to meet the challenges of the new northern research paradigm. Arctic 64: 127–135.Google Scholar