Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:20:08.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical perspective of Otto Nordenskjöld's Antarctic penguin fossil collection and Carl Wiman's contribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2017

Carolina Acosta Hospitaleche ,
Jonas Hagström ,
Marcelo Reguero  and
Thomas Mörs
Carolina Acosta Hospitaleche
Affiliation:
División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina ([email protected])
Jonas Hagström
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
Marcelo Reguero
Affiliation:
División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA, La Plata and Instituto Antártico Argentino (Dirección Nacional del Antártico), 25 de mayo 1143, San Martín, Argentina
Thomas Mörs
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The early explorer and scientist Otto Nordenskjöld, leader of the Swedish South Polar Expedition of 1901–1903, was the first to collect Antarctic penguin fossils. The site is situated in the northeastern region of Seymour Island and constitutes one of the most important localities in the study of fossilised penguins. The task of describing these specimens together with fossilised whale remains was given to Professor Carl Wiman (1867–1944) at Uppsala University, Sweden. Although the paradigm for the systematic study of penguins has changed considerably over recent years, Wiman's contributions are still remarkable. His establishment of grouping by size as a basis for classification was a novel approach that allowed them to deal with an unexpectedly high morphological diversity and limited knowledge of penguin skeletal anatomy. In the past, it was useful to provide a basic framework for the group that today could be used as ‘taxon free’ categories. First, it was important to define new species, and then to establish a classification based on size and robustness. This laid the foundation for the first attempts to use morphometric parameters for the classification of isolated penguin bones. The Nordenskjöld materials constitute an invaluable collection for comparative purposes, and every year researchers from different countries visit this collection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 364 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aagaard, B. (1930). Fangst og forskning I Sydishavet [Catches and research in the South Polar Sea]. I–II. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Acosta Hospitaleche, C. (2013). New crania from Seymour Island (Antarctica) that shed light on anatomy of Eocene penguins. Polish Polar Research, 34, 397–412.Google Scholar
Acosta Hospitaleche, C. (2014). New penguin giant bones from Antarctica: systematic and paleobiological significance. Comptes Rendus Palevol., 13, 555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta Hospitaleche, C. & Reguero, M. (2010). Taxonomic notes about Ichtyopteryx gracilis Wiman, 1905 and Orthopteryx gigas Wiman, 1905 (Aves, Spheniscidae). Alcheringa, 35, 463–466.Google Scholar
Acosta Hospitaleche, C., Reguero, M. & Scarano, A. (2013). Main pathways in the evolution of Antarctic fossil penguins. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 43, 101–111.Google Scholar
Andersson, J. G. (1905). De vetenskapliga arbetena ombord på Antarctic sommaren 1902–03 och slädfärden till Snow Hill 1903. [The scientific work onboard Antarctic during the summer 1902–1903 and the sledge journey to Snow Hill 1903] Ymer, 24, 68–81.Google Scholar
Andersson, J. G. (1906). On the geology of Graham Land. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University of Uppsala, 7, 19–71.Google Scholar
Andersson, J. G. (1944). Antarctic. Stolt har hon levat, stolt ska hon dö. [Antarctic. Proudly has she lived, proudly she will die.]. Stockholm: Saxon & Lindström.Google Scholar
Bargo, M. S. & Reguero, M. A. (1998). Annotated catalogue of the fossil vertebrates from Antarctica housed in the Museo de La Plata. I. Birds and land mammals from La Meseta formation (Eocene–?early Oligocene). In: Casadío, S. (Ed.), Paleógeno de América del Sur y de la Península Antártica (Vol. 5) (pp. 211–221). Buenos Aires. Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, Publicación Especial.Google Scholar
Brodkorb, P. (1963). Catalogue of fossil birds. 1 (Archaeopterygiformes through Ardeiformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum (Biological Sciences), 7, 177–293.Google Scholar
Chávez Hoffmeister, M. (2014). Phylogenetic characters in the humerus and tarsometatarsus of penguins. Polish Polar Research, 35, 469–496.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. (1916). The reincarnation of James Eights, Antarctic explorer. The Scientific Monthly, 2, 189–202.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A., Francis, J. E., Cantrill, D. J. & Pirrie, D. (2004). Maastrichtian stratigraphy of Antarctica. Cretaceous Research, 25, 411–423.Google Scholar
del Valle, R. A., Elliot, D. H. & Macdonald, D. I. M. (1992). Sedimentary basins on the east flank of the Antarctic Peninsula: proposed nomenclature. Antarctic Science, 4, 477–478.Google Scholar
Destéfani, L. H., Cioccale, M. & Rabassa, J. (2001). The 1901–1903 Nordenskjöld Expedition and José Maria Sobral: the first Argentinian in Antarctica. Ymer, 121, 231–269.Google Scholar
Dingle, R. & Lavelle, M. (1998). Antarctic Peninsula cryosphere: early Oligocene (c. 30 Ma) initiation and a revised glacial chronology. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 155, 433–437.Google Scholar
Douglas, P. M. J., Affek, H. P., Ivany, L. C., Houben, A. J. P., Sijp, W.P., Sluijs, A., . . . Pagani, M. (2014). Pronounced zonal heterogeneity in Eocene southern high latitude sea surface temperatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 6582–6587.Google Scholar
Dutton, A. L., Lohmann, K. & Zinsmeister, W. J. (2002). Stable isotope and minor element proxies for Eocene climate of Seymour Island Antarctica. Paleoceanography, 17, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E. (2003). Early crown–group Cetacea in the southern ocean: the toothed archaic mysticete Llanocetus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23, 50A.Google Scholar
Goldberg, F. (2001). Polarforskaren Otto Nordenskjöld 1869–1928. [The Polar researcher Otto Nordenskjöld 1869–1928.] Ymer, 121, 51–72.Google Scholar
Hathway, B. (2000). Continental rift to back-arc basin: Jurassic–Cretaceous stratigraphical and structural evolution of the Larsen Basin, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 157, 417–432.Google Scholar
Headland, R. K. (2004). Antarctic odyssey: historical stages in development of knowledge of the Antarctic. In: Elzinga, A., Nordin, T., Turner, D. R.and Wråkberg, U. (Eds.), Antarctic challenges: historical and current perspectives on Otto Nordenskjöld's Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903 (pp. 15–24). Gothenburg: Royal Society of Arts and Sciences in Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Hjort, C. & Ingólfsson, O. (2004). Otto Nordenskjöld´s contributions to glaciation history. A bipolar effort with a southern focus. In: Elzinga, A., Nordin, T., Turner, D. R.and Wråkberg, U. (Eds.), Antarctic challenges: historical and current perspectives on Antarctica (pp. 188–199). Gothenburg: Royal Society of Arts and Sciences in Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Holm, G. (1906). Institutionsföreståndarnes. Kungliga Vetenskapsakademiens årsbok, [Head of department's yearly report]. 1906, 138–140.Google Scholar
Ivany, L.C., Lohmann, K. C., Hasiuk, F., Blake, D. B., Glass, A., Aronson, R. B. & Moody, R. M. (2008). Eocene climate record of a high southern latitude continental shelf: Seymour Island, Antarctica. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 120, 659–678.Google Scholar
Jadwiszczak, P. (2009). Review Penguin past: the current state of knowledge. Polish Polar Research, 30, 3–28.Google Scholar
Jadwiszczak, P. & Mörs, T. (2011). Aspects of diversity in early Antarctic penguins. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 56, 269–277.Google Scholar
Kriwet, J., Engelbrecht, A., Mörs, T., Reguero, M. & Pfaff, C. (2016). Ultimate Eocene (Priabonian) chondrichthyans (Holocephali, Elasmobranchii) of Antarctica. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 36, e1160911.Google Scholar
Ksepka, D. T., Bertelli, S. & Giannini, N. (2006). The phylogeny of the living and fossil Sphenisciformes (penguins). Cladistics, 22, 412–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, K. (2001). Tre geologer i yttersta södern [Three geologists in the Far South]. Ymer, 121, 97–116.Google Scholar
Liljequist, G. H. (1993). High latitudes – a history of Swedish polar travels and research. Stockholm: The Swedish Polar Research Secretariat in collaboration with Streiffert.Google Scholar
MacDonald, D. I. M., Baker, P. F., Garrett, S. W., Ineson, J. R., Pirrie, D., Storey, B. C., . . . Marshall, J. E. (1988). A preliminary assessment of the hydrocarbon potential of the Larsen Basin, Antarctica. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 5, 34–53.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S. A., Santillana, S. N. & Rinaldi, C. A. (1996). Stratigraphy of La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Marambio Island, Antarctica (pp. 33–34). I Congreso Paleógeno de América del Sur, Santa Rosa.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S. A., Santillana, S. N. & Rinaldi, C. A. (1998a). Paleoambientes sedimentarios de la Aloformación La Meseta (Eoceno), Isla Marambio (Seymour), Antártida. Instituto Antártico Argentino, Contribución, 464, 1–51.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S. A., Santillana, S. N. & Rinaldi, C. A. (1998b). Stratigraphy of the La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Marambio (Seymour) Island, Antarctica. In: S. Casadío (Ed.), Paleógeno de América del Sur y de la Península Antártica. Publicación Especial de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 5, 137–146.Google Scholar
Marples, B. J. (1953). Fossil penguins from the mid-Tertiary of Seymour Island. Falkland Island Dependency Survey Science Report, 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. D. (1989). A new cetacean from the late Eocene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, 2219–2235.Google Scholar
Montes, M., Nozal, F., Santillana, S. N., Marenssi, S. & Olivero, E. (2013). Mapa geológico de Isla Marambio (Seymour), Antártida (1st ed.). Scale 1:20.000. . . Serie Cartográfica.Google Scholar
Myrcha, A., Jadwiszczak, P., Tambussi, C. P., Noriega, J., Gazdzicki, A., Tatur, A. & del Valle, R. (2002). Taxonomic revision of Eocene Antarctic penguins based on tarsometatarsal morphology. Polish Polar Research, 23, 5–46.Google Scholar
Nordenskjöld, O. (1901). Sydpolarforskningens nuvarande ställning och mål. [South Pole Research's current position and goals] Ymer, 21, 51–75.Google Scholar
Nordenskjöld, O. (1904). Antarctic. Två år bland sydpolens isar. I–II. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Nordin, T. (2004). Beyond borders: Otto Nordenskjölds many missions. In: Elzinga, A., Nordin, T., Turner, D. R.and Wråkberg, U., (Eds.), Antarctic challenges: historical and current perspectives on Otto Nordenskjöld's Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903 (pp. 66–78). Gothenburg: Royal Society of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Reguero, M. A., Marenssi, S. A. & Santillana, S. N. (2002). Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia Paleogene terrestrial environments: biotic and biogeographic relationships. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 179, 189–210.Google Scholar
Reguero, M. A. & Gasparini, Z. (2007). Late cretaceous–early tertiary marine and terrestrial vertebrates from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula: a review. In: Rabassa, J.and Borda, M. L. (Eds.), Antarctic Peninsula and Tierra del Fuego: 100 years of Swedish–Argentine scientific cooperation at the end of the world (pp. 55–76). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Reguero, M., Goin, F., Acosta Hospitaleche, C., Dutra, T. & Marenssi, S. (2013). Late Cretaceous/Paleogene West Antarctica: terrestrial biota and its intercontinental affinities. London: SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences.Google Scholar
Sadler, P. (1988). Geometry and stratification of uppermost Cretaceous and Paleogene units of Seymour Island, northern Antarctic Peninsula. Geological Society of America Memoirs, 169, 303–320.Google Scholar
Sharman, G. & Newton, E. T. (1894). Note on some fossils from Seymour Island, in the Antarctic regions, obtained by Dr Donald. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 37, 707–709.Google Scholar
Sharman, G. & Newton, E. T. (1898). Notes on some additional fossils collected at Seymour Island, Graham's Land, by Dr Donald and Captain Larsen. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 22, 58–61.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1946). Fossil penguins. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 87, 1–99.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1971). Review of fossil penguins from Seymour Island. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 178, 357–387.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. & Long, J. (2011). Frozen in time: prehistoric life in Antarctica. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Tambussi, C. P., Acosta Hospitaleche, C., Reguero, M. & Marenssi, S. A. (2006). Late Eocene penguins from West Antarctica: systematics and biostratigraphy. Special Publication of the Geological Society of London, 258, 45–161.Google Scholar
Tambussi, C. P. & Degrange, F. (2013). South American and Antarctic continental Cenozoic birds. Paleobiogeographic affinities and disparities. Dordrecht: SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences.Google Scholar
Wiman, C. (1905a). Über die alttertiären Vertebraten der Seymourinsel. Wissenschaftlichee Ergebnisse der Schwedische Südpolar–Expedition: 1901–03, 3, 1–37.Google Scholar
Wiman, C. (1905b). Vorläufige Mitteilung über die alttertiären Vertebraten der Seymourinsel. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University Uppsala, 6, 247–256.Google Scholar
Wråkberg, U. (2001). Den internationella antarktisforskningen och Otto Nordenskjölds sydpolarexpedition 1901–03. [The international Antarctic research and Otto Nordenskiöld's South Pole expedition 1901–03] Ymer, 121, 25–50.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. (1988). Early geological exploration of Seymour Island, Antarctica. Geological Society of America Memoirs, 169, 1–16.Google Scholar