No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Greenland's new legislation on commercial and research-related use of biological resources: implications for the International Polar Year and later
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2008
Abstract
New possibilities for economic development have been identified by the Greenland Home Rule Government in recent years. One of these is the potential for development of biotechnology based on Greenland's biodiversity. To ensure that Greenland shares in benefits derived from the exploitation of these resources the Home Rule Parliament recently enacted legislation on commercial and research-related use of biological resources that is premised on rights recognised by the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity. This legislation represents the first law in an Arctic jurisdiction specifically to create a mechanism for access and benefit sharing in relation to Arctic genetic resources. The main area of research and commercial interest so far relates to potential developments in biotechnology from the microbial diversity of ikaite tufa columns located in the Ikka Fjord in southwest Greenland. The legislation seeks to provide a mechanism for regulating access to such biological resources and a means for Greenland to share in the potential benefits that may come from scientific research on them and subsequent commercialisation. Much research in Greenland now falls within the scope of this legislation. The purpose of this article is to explain the provisions of the legislation to the polar research community as well as to review its implications for research in the International Polar Year and later. The legislation imposes many new obligations on researchers in Greenland including obligations to obtain survey licences, obligations on reporting and the regulation of publication of scientific research. Commercially focussed research is also tightly regulated with a particular emphasis on patent rights. However, many aspects of the legislation are uncertain and it is unclear how much of the legislation will be implemented in practice.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Aarup, C. 2006. Identification of bioflim-producing bacteria in ikaite tufa columns, Unpublished Masters thesis, Royal Veterinary and Agriculture University, Denmark.Google Scholar
Clark, M., Clarke, A., Cockell, C., Convey, P., Detrich, H., Fraser, K., Johnston, I., Methe, B., Murray, A., Peck, L., Römisch, K., and Rogers, A.. 2004. Antarctic genomics. Comparative and Functional Genomics 5:230–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denmark. 2007. International Polar Year, 2007. IPY in Greenland. URL: http://www.ipy.dk/greenland.htmGoogle Scholar
Finland, Ministry of Environment. 2006. Geenivarojen saatavuutta ja hyötyjen jakoa koskevien Bonnin ohjeiden kansallinen toimeenpano [Bonn guidelines on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: national conduct of the Bonn guidelines in Finland]. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Greenland, Department of Industry. 2007. Invest in Greenland. URL: http://www.greenlandexpo.comGoogle Scholar
Greenland, Home Rule Parliament. 2006a. Explanatory memorandum to a Bill for legislation on commercial and research-related use of biological resources (EM 2006/49, 7 August 2006).Google Scholar
Greenland, Home Rule Parliament. 2006b. Commercial and research-related use of biological resources. (Act No.20, 20 November 2006 unofficial English translation).Google Scholar
Hemmings, A., and Rogan-Finnemore, M. (editors). 2005. Antarctic bioprospecting. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
Leary, D. 2007a. Lessons from the arctic: the power of the Arctic to shape environmental governance in the Antarctic. Rovaniemi. (Paper presented at the conference Knowledge and Power in the Arctic, 15–18 April 2007).Google Scholar
Leary, D. 2007b. International law and the genetic resources of the deep sea. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohan, D., and Johnston, S.. 2005. Bioprospecting in Antarctica. Tokyo: United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Lyck, L. 1989. Greenland: ten years of home rule. Polar Record 25 (155): 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council of the National Academies. 2003. Frontiers in polar biology in the genomic era. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Prieme, A., and Stougaard, P.. 2006. Bacterial diversity in permanently cold and alkaline ikaite columns from Greenland. Extremophiles 10: 551–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, M., Prieme, A., and Stougaard, P.. 2007. Arsukibacterium ikkense gen. nov., sp. nov, a novel alkaliphilic enzyme-producing proteobacterium isolated from a cold and alkaline environment in Greenland. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 30: 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, P., Jørgensen, F., Johnson, M., and Hansen, O.. 2002. Microbial diversity in ikaite tufa columns: an alkaline cold ecological niche in Greenland. Environmental Microbiology 4 (8): 487–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Kate, K. and Laird, S.. 1999. The commercial use of biodiversity. Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
UNU-IAS (United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies). 2007. Biological prospecting in Antarctica: review, update and proposed tool to support a way forward. New Delhi: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XXX (IP 67).Google Scholar
WWF. 2005. The big four-an update on Greenland's efforts with regard to species conservation and nature protection. Copenhagen: WWF DenmarkGoogle Scholar