Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:53:40.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The goals of the EU seal products trade regulation: from effectiveness to consequence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2014

Nikolas Sellheim
Nikolas Sellheim*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, PO Box 122, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When policies are adopted, it seems reasonable to assume that they address a certain issue and provide means to mitigate specific problems. This seems the case with the EU's regime on trade in seal products, but it becomes evident that the goal formulation in this case is blurry and unclear. Taking animal welfare, the so-called ‘Inuit exemption’, and internal market harmonisation into account, this article examines the goals of the seal products trade regime and how they are applied. It becomes clear that the attainment of goals bears consequences that are unprecedented due to conceptual and formulation difficulties. Given the indistinct goal formulation during the policy-shaping process and the goal formulation in the policy itself, it seems fair to say that the regime does not aim to improve animal welfare standards in the commercial seal hunt, but rather aims to shut down the commercial hunt completely. This, however, affects Inuit and non-Inuit seal hunters equally and is inconsistent with secondary goals that are formulated in the EU's documents relating to the Arctic. Therefore, the seal products trade regime has consequences that challenge the EU's ambitions in the north.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 274 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACHPR (African Commission on Human and People's Rights). 2005. Report of the African Commission's working group of experts on indigenous populations/communities,. Banjul, Copenhagen: ACHPR, IWGIA. URL: http://pro169.org/res/materials/en/identification/ACHPR%20Report%20on%20indigenous%20populations–communities.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
AHDR (Arctic Human Development Report). 2004. Arctic human development report. Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.Google Scholar
AC (Arctic Council). 2013. Kiruna declaration, Kiruna, Sweden 15 May 2013. Kiruna: Arctic Council. URL: http://www.arctic–council.org/index.php/en/document–archive/category/425–main–documents–from–kiruna–ministerial–meeting?download=1757:kiruna–declaration–final–signed–version (accessed 2 January 2014).Google Scholar
Barry, D. 2005. Icy battleground – Canada, the International Fund for Animal Welfare, and the seal hunt. St. John's: Breakwater Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1888. The central Eskimo (reprint 1964). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Broom, D. 1991. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Animal Science 69: 4167–4175Google Scholar
Busch, B.C. 1985. The war against the seals – A history of the North American seal fishery. Kingston and Montreal: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Butterworth, A. and Richardson, M.. 2013. A review of animal welfare implications of the Canadian commercial seal hunt. Marine Policy 38: 457–469.Google Scholar
Canada (Department of Fisheries and Oceans). 2009. Amendments to the Marine Mammal Regulations – seal harvest. Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans. URL: http://www.dfo–mpo.gc.ca/media/back–fiche/2009/seal–hunt–chasse–au–phoque–eng.htm (accessed 11 June 2013).Google Scholar
Canada (Department of Fisheries and Oceans). 2013a. Landings and landed value by species, preliminary data, vessel length category: (Nearshore: vessels 35–64 ft. 11 in. (10.7–19.8m)). Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans. URL: http://www.nfl.dfo–mpo.gc.ca/publications/reports–rapports/Land–Nearshore–Debarquer–Pres–De–La–Cote–2013–eng.htm (accessed 14 August 2013).Google Scholar
Canada (Department of Fisheries and Oceans). 2013b. Landings and landed value by species, preliminary data, vessel length category: (Inshore: vessels 0–34 ft. 11 in. (0–10.6m)). Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans. URL: http://www.nfl.dfo–mpo.gc.ca/publications/reports–rapports/Land–Inshore–Debarquer–cotiere–2013–eng.htm (accessed 14 August 2013).Google Scholar
CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna). nd. CITES trade database, Geneva: CITES. URL: http://www.cites.org/eng/resources/trade.shtml (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
Council of the European Union Legal Council. 2009. 6623/09. Opinion of the Legal Service – proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in seal products – legal basis. Brussels: Council of the European Union Legal Council.Google Scholar
COWI (Consultancy within Engineering, Environmental Science and Economics). 2008. European Commission Directorate–General Environment, assessment of the potential impact of a ban of products derived from seal species. April 2008. Kongens Lyngby: COWI, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/animal–welfare/seals/pdf/seals–report.pdf (accessed 29 June 2013).Google Scholar
COWI (Consultancy within Engineering, Environmental Science and Economics). 2010, European Commission Directorate–General Environment, study on implementing measures for trade in seal products – final report. January 2010. Kongens Lyngby: COWI. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/animal–welfare/seals/pdf/study–implementing–measures.pdf (accessed 29 June 2013).Google Scholar
Dahl, J. 2000. Saqqaq – An Inuit hunting community in the modern world. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
Daoust, P.–Y. and Caraguel, C.. 2012. The Canadian harp seal hunt: observations on the effectiveness of procedures to avoid poor animal welfare outcomes. Animal Welfare 21: 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2008a. COM (2008) 469 final, Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in seal products. Brussels: European Commission. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0469:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2008b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – the European Union and the arctic region /* COM/2008/0763 final */. Brussels: European Commission. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0763:FIN:EN:HTML (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2010a. Commission regulation (EU) No 737/2010 of 10 August 2010 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on trade in seal products. Brussels: European Commission. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:216:0001:01:EN:HTML (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2010b. Maritime forum – first Arctic dialogue workshop. Brussels: European Commission. URL: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/content/1831 (accessed 14 August 2013).Google Scholar
EC (European Commission).2011. Maritime forum – second Arctic Dialogue workshop. Brussels: European Commission. URL: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/content/1829 (accessed 14 August 2013).Google Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2012a. European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Developing a European Union policy towards the Arctic region: progress since 2008 and next steps, Brussels, 26 June 2012, JOIN(2012) 19 final. Brussels: European Commission. URL: http://eeas.europa.eu/arctic–region/docs/join–2012–19.pdf (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2012b. European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Joint Staff Working Document. The inventory of activities in the framework of developing a European Union Arctic Policy. Accompanying the document Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Developing a European Union policy towards the Arctic region: progress since 2008 and next steps, Brussels, 26 June 2012, SWD(2012) 182 final. Brussels: European Commission. URL: http://eeas.europa.eu/arctic–region/docs/swd–2012–182.pdf (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
ECoun (Council of the European Communities). 1983. Council directive 83/129/EEC of 28 March 1983 concerning the importation into member states of skins of certain seal pups and products derived therefrom. Brussels: Council of the European Communities. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31983L0129:EN:HTML (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
ECoun (Council of the European Communities). 1992. Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna. Brussels: Council of the European Communities. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1992L0043:20070101:EN:PDF (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
ECoun (Council of the European Union). 2009a. Council conclusions on Arctic issues, 2985th Foreign Affairs Council meeting Brussels, 8 December 2009. Brussels: Council of the European Union. URL: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms–Data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/111814.pdf (accessed 10 June 2013)Google Scholar
ECoun (Council of the European Union). 2009b. Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Brussels: Council of the European Union. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2007. Animal welfare aspects of the killing and skinning of seals. The EFSA Journal 610. (Parma: EFSA. URL: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/610.pdf (accessed 2 June 2013)).Google Scholar
EP (European Parliament). 2006. Declaration P6–TA(2006)0369, banning seal products in the European Union. Brussels: European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=–//EP//NONSGML+TA+P6–TA–2006–0369+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EP (European Parliament). 2009a. Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on trade in seal products. Brussels: European Parliament. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:286:0036:01:EN:HTML (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EP (European Parliament). 2009b. Debates, 4 May 2009, Strasbourg. Brussels: European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=–//EP//TEXT+CRE+20090504+ITEM–021+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 14 August 2013).Google Scholar
EP (European Parliament). 2011. P7–TA(2011)0024, A sustainable EU policy for the high north – European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2011 on a sustainable EU policy for the high north (2009/2214(INI)). Brussels: European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=–//EP//NONSGML+TA+P7–TA–2011–0024+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EP (European Parliament). 2012. Report on reporting obligations under Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (2011/2291(INI)). Brussels: European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A7–2012–0225&language=EN (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EU (Directorate General, Health and Consumers). nd. Animal health. Brussels: European Commission. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/index–en.htm (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EU (European Union). 2001. Consolidated version of the treaty establishing the European Community. C 325/33, as amended. Nice: European Union. URL: http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Legal–basis/12002E–EN.pdf (accessed 2 January 2014).Google Scholar
EUGC. 2013a. Judgment of the General Court (Seventh chamber) 25 April 2013 (*) (Trade in seal products – Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 – Detailed rules for implementation – Regulation (EU) No 737/2010 – Prohibition on placing such products on the market – Exception in favour of Inuit communities – Plea of illegality – Legal basis – Subsidiarity – Proportionality – Misuse of powers). Luxembourg: EUGC. URL: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=136881&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=429227 (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
EUGC. 2013b. The General Court confirms the validity of the regulation on the marketing of seal products. Press Release 55/13, Luxembourg, 25 April 2013. Luxembourg: EUGC. URL: http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013–04/cp130055en.pdf (accessed 11 June 2013).Google Scholar
EUPubl (Publications Office of the European Union). 1994. Documents concerning the accession of the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Norway to the European Union. Luxembourg: EU Publications Office. URL: http://eur–lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/11994N/htm/11994N.html#0352020030 (accessed 17 December 2013), Protocol 3.Google Scholar
European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs. 2009. Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in seals products. Brussels: Committee on Legal Affairs. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/juri/avis/2009/423732/JURI_AL(2009)423732_EN.pdf (accessed 3 January 2014).Google Scholar
Finland (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). 2007. Management plan for the Finnish seal populations in the Baltic Sea. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M. 2010. Indigenous whaling, protection of the environment, intergenerational rights and environmental ethics. In Alfredsson, G., Koivurova, T. and Loukacheva, N. (editors). 2010. Yearbook of polar law 2. Leiden: BRILL: 253–277.Google Scholar
Glømsrød, S. and Aaslaksen, I., 2008. The economy of the north 2008: an introduction. In: Glømsrød, S. and Aaslaksen, I. (editors). 2008. The economy of the north 2008. Oslo: Statistics Norway: 7–10.Google Scholar
Helcom (Helsinki Commission). 2006. HELCOM recommendation 27–28/2 – Conservation of seals in the Baltic Sea area. Helsinki: Helcom. URL: http://www.helcom.fi/Recommendations/en–GB/rec27–28–2/ (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
Henke, J. 1985. Seal wars – an American viewpoint. St. John's: Breakwater Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, G. and Gales, N.. 2008. IUCN SSN Pinniped specialist group. Arctocephalus pusillus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Version 2013.2). Cambridge: IUCN. URL: http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/2060/0 (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
Hossain, K. 2008. Hunting by indigenous peoples of charismatic mega–fauna: does a human rights approach challenge the way hunting by indigenous peoples is regulated? International Community Law Review 10: 295–318.Google Scholar
Hossain, K. 2012. The EU ban on the import of seal products and the WTO regulations: neglected human rights of the Arctic indigenous peoples? Polar Record 49 (2): 154–166.Google Scholar
ILO (International Labour Organization). 1989. Convention concerning indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries – C169. Geneva: ILO. URL: http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100–ILO–CODE:C169 (accessed 17 December 2013).Google Scholar
ITK (Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami). 2013. EU general court rules against the sustainable use of seals. Media Release, 25 April 2013. URL: https://www.itk.ca/media/media–release/eu–general–court–rules–against–sustainable–use–seals (accessed 11 June 2013).Google Scholar
Kovacs, K. 2008. IUCN SSC Pinniped specialist group. Pagophilus groenlandicus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Version 2013.1). Cambridge: IUCN. URL: http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/41671/0 (accessed 17 December 2013).Google Scholar
Kretzer, M. 2013. Victory for seals! EU Court upholds seal–fur ban. The PETA Files. Norfolk: PETA. URL: http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2013/04/26/victory–for–seals–eu–court–upholds–seal–fur–ban.aspx (accessed 13 June 2013).Google Scholar
Lynge, F. 1991. Arctic wars, animal rights, endangered peoples. Hanover and London: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Namibia (Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources). 2004. Namibia's marine resources policy – towards responsible development and management of the marine resources sector. Windhoek: Namibia Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources. URL: http://209.88.21.36/opencms/export/sites/default/grnnet/MFMR/Laws–and–Policies/docs/whitepaper.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
Namibia (Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources). 2009. Policy statement (guidelines) for the granting of rights to harvets [sic] marine resources and the allocation of fishing quotas. Windhoek: Namibia Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources. URL: http://209.88.21.36/opencms/export/sites/default/grnnet/MFMR/Laws–and–Policies/docs/Policy–draft–July09.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
Newfoundland and Labrador (Department for Fisheries and Aquaculture). 2005–2012. Landings and landed value. St. John's: Department for Fisheries and Aquaculture. URL: http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca/stats/landings/index.html (accessed 12 June 2013).Google Scholar
Newfoundland and Labrador (Department for Fisheries and Aquaculture). 2012. Provincial government loan boosts 2012 seal hunt, News Release, 5 April 2012. St. John's: Department for Fisheries and Aquaculture. URL: http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2012/fishaq/0405n05.htm (accessed 13 June 2013).Google Scholar
Newfoundland and Labrador (Department for Fisheries and Aquaculture). 2013. 2013 seal harvest receives financial boost. St. John's: Department for Fisheries and Aquaculture. URL: http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2013/fishaq/0327n03.htm (accessed 13 June 2013).Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers. 2010. Arctic social indicators – a follow–up to the Arctic Human Development Report. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Nunavut (Government of Nunavut, Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., the Embrace Life Council and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police). 2010. Nunavut suicide prevention strategy. URL: http://www.hss.gov.nu.ca/PDF/Suicide%20Prevention%20Strategy–final.pdf (accessed 11 June 2013).Google Scholar
Nunavut (Department of Environment). 2012. Report on the impacts of the European Union seal ban, (EC) 1007/2009, in Nunavut. Iqaluit: Department of Environment. URL: http://env.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/impactssealban_web.pdf (accessed 3 January 2014)Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2005. Chapter 12 – Hunting, herding, fishing and gathering: indigenous peoples and renewable resource use in the Arctic. In ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment). 2005. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 649–690.Google Scholar
Pelly, D.F. 2001. Sacred hunt – a portrait of the relationship between seals and Inuit, Vancouver: Greystone Books.Google Scholar
Peter, A. 2010. The European Parliament shuts down seal products imports – again. Above and Beyond – Canada's Arctic Journal, May/June 2010: 3–7.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. 1994. The ice hunters – a history of Newfoundland sealing to 1914. St. John's: Breakwater Books (Newfoundland History Series 8).Google Scholar
Ryan, S. and Small, L.. 1978. Haulin’ rope and gaff – songs and poetry in the history of the Newfoundland seal fishery. St. John's: Breakwater Books.Google Scholar
Sanz–Aguilar, A., Martínez–Abraín, A., Tavecchia, G., Mínguez, E. and Oro, D.. 2009. Evidence–based culling of a facultative predator: efficacy and efficiency components. Biological Conservation 2 (142): 424–431.Google Scholar
Scotland (Government). 2010. Marine (Scotland) Act 2010. Edinburgh: Government of Scotland. URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2010/5/pdfs/asp–20100005–en.pdf (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
Sellheim, N. (forthcoming). Policies and influence – tracing and locating the EU seal products trade regulation. International Community Law Review 17 (1), 2015.Google Scholar
Sellheim, N. 2013a. The neglected tradition? – The genesis of the EU seal products trade ban and commercial sealing. In Alfredsson, G., Koivurova, T. and Stepien, A. (editors). The yearbook of polar law 5. Leiden: BRILL: 417–450.Google Scholar
Sellheim, N. 2013b. Internal exteriority – the EU seal products trade ban and its external implications. San Francisco: International Studies Association (Paper presented at International Studies Association (ISA) annual convention, 4 April 2013, San Francisco, USA).Google Scholar
Smith, B., Caraguel, C., Crook, A., Daoust, P.-Y., Dunn, J. L., Lair, S., Longair, A., Philippa, J., Routh, A. and Tuttle, A.. 2005. Improving humane practice in the Canadian harp seal hunt – a report of the Independent Veterinarians’ Working Group on the Canadian harp seal hunt. Saskatoon: CCWHC. URL: http://www.ccwhc.ca/publications/IVWG–Report–new–website.pdf (accessed 2 January 2014).Google Scholar
Sweden (Naturvårdsverket [Swedish Environmental Protection Agency]). 2007. National management plan for grey seal stock in the Baltic Sea – the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket. [Swedish Environmental Protection Agency].Google Scholar
UN (United Nations). 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. New York: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. URL: http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx (accessed 3 January 2014)Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2001. Proclamation of masterpieces of the oral and intangible heritage of humanity, 18 May 2001. Paris: UNESCO. URL: http://www.unesco.org/bpi/intangible–heritage/backgrounde.htm (accessed 11 June 2013).Google Scholar
United States (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2012. Stock assessment report – harp seal – 2012. Washington, D.C.: NOAA. URL: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/ao2012sehp–wn.pdf (accessed 17 December 2013).Google Scholar
Usher, P.J., Duhaime, G. and Searles, E.. 2003. The household as an economic unit in Arctic aboriginal communities, and its measurement by means of a comprehensive survey. Social Indicators Research 61: 175–202.Google Scholar
Waldau, P. 2011. Animal rights – what everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, P. 2004. Seal wars – my twenty–five year struggle to save the seals. London: Vision Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Wenzel, G. 1991. Animal rights, human rights – ecology, economy and ideology in the Canadian Arctic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Yodsis, P. 2001. Must top–predators be culled for the sake of fisheries? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2 (16): 78–84.Google Scholar