Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:06:38.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emerging legal concerns in the Arctic: sovereignty, navigation and land claim disputes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2009

Richard D. Parker  and
Zagros Madjd-Sadjadi
Richard D. Parker
Affiliation:
Earl N. Phillips School of Business, High Point University, 833 Montlieu Avenue, Drawer 40, High Point, NC 27262-3598, USA ([email protected])
Zagros Madjd-Sadjadi
Affiliation:
Center for Economic Analysis, School of Business and Economics, RJR 106, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With global warming, the clearance of the Northwest Passage and the rising demands for new energy resources, the sovereignty of Canadian and other national land claims in the Arctic north is coming into question by those wishing to control access to this region. The present paper examines issues involving emerging landmasses, maritime rights, strategic control and navigation, perhaps the most important variable, and the consequences in terms of commercial economies and geopolitical impacts. We consider many variables such as the 1982 Falkland Islands war as a demonstrative example that may have translatable impact in future years. Our purpose in this paper is to raise awareness of impending geopolitical activities that are inevitable during the 21st century as the Arctic pack ice retreats.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 336 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agoes, E.R. 2000. The law of the sea and navigation: The Indonesian archipelagic state perspective. In: Rothwell, D.R., and Bateman, S. (editors). Navigational rights and freedoms and the new law of the sea. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff: 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auburn, F.M. 1982. Antarctic law and politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, P.V. 2000. British strategy in the Falklands war. Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces. 26: 1.Google Scholar
BBC News. 2007. Russia plants flag under N Pole. BBC News 2 August 2007. URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6927395.stm (accessed 12 August 2009).Google Scholar
BBC News. 2008. UK makes Atlantic sea bed claim. BBC News 27 August 2008. URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7583353.stm (accessed 12 August 2009).Google Scholar
Beck, P.J. 1986. The international politics of Antarctica. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Binkley, A. 2008a. Arctic shipping creates opportunities, challenges. Canadian Sailings 28 April 2008.Google Scholar
Binkley, A. 2008b. Sovereignty remains hot political issue. Canadian Sailings 28 April 2008.Google Scholar
Bird, K.J., Charpentier, R.R., Gautier, D.L., Houseknecht, D.W., Klett, T.R., Pitman, J.K., Moore, T.E., Schenk, C.J., Tennyson, M.E., and Wandrey, C.J.. 2008. Circum-Arctic resource appraisal; estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic Circle. Reston VA: United States Geological Survey (fact sheet 2008–3049).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchfield, M. and Boswell, R.. 2009. Bush takes final swing at Arctic sovereignty. National Post 12 January 2009.Google Scholar
Borgerson, S.G. 2008. Arctic meltdown. Foreign Affairs 87 (2): 63–77.Google Scholar
Burress, C. 2004. Romancing the north: Berkeley explorer may have stepped on ancient Thule. San Francisco Chronicle 17 June 2004.Google Scholar
Byers, M. 2007. Intent for a nation: what is Canada for? Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre.Google Scholar
Canadian Corporate News. 2008. Canada asserts sovereignty in the high Arctic. Canadian Corporate News 27 March 2008.Google Scholar
Canada. 1907. Debates of the Senate of the Dominion of Canada, Third Session, Tenth Parliament, 20 February 1907. Ottawa: S. E. Dawson, Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty.Google Scholar
Carmel, S. 2008. Commercial shipping and the maritime strategy. Naval War College Review 61 (2): 39–46.Google Scholar
Carnaghan, M., and Goody, A.. 2006. Canadian Arctic Sovereignty. Ottawa: Library of Parliament, Parliament Information and Research Service (PRB 05-61E).Google Scholar
CBC News. 2008. 1st commercial ship sails through Northwest Passage. CBC News 28 November 2008. URL: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2008/11/28/nwest-vessel.htmlGoogle Scholar
Charteris, A.H. 1929. Australasian claims in Antarctica. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 11 (4): 226–232.Google Scholar
Charron, A. 2005–2006. The northwest passage in context. The Canadian Military Journal 6 (4): 41–48.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. 2007. Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic. Military Periscope (special reports 26 April 2007).Google Scholar
Dufrense, R. 2007, Canada's legal claims over Arctic territory and waters. Ottawa: Library of Parliament, Parliament Information and Research Service (PRB 07-36B).Google Scholar
Dutton, P.A. 2007. International law and the November 2004 ‘Han incident.’ In: Erickson, A.S., Goldstein, L. G., Murray, W. S., and Wilson, A.R. (editors). China's future nuclear submarine force. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press: 162–181.Google Scholar
Elliot-Meisel, E.B. 1999. Still unresolved after fifty years: the Northwest Passage in Canadian-American relations, 1946–1998. American Review of Canadian Studies. 29 (3): 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esprit de Corps. 2007. Breaking the ice. Esprit de Corps 14 (7): 19.Google Scholar
Gaillard, M.E. 2001. Canada's sovereignty in changing Arctic waters. Northern Review 24: 184–189.Google Scholar
Haberman, C. 1988. Japanese fight invading sea for priceless speck of land. New York Times 4 January 1988.Google Scholar
Hanessian, J. 1960. The Antarctic Treaty 1959. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 9 (3): 436–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, S. 2007. Prime Minister of Canada: video vault entry 9 July 2007. URL: http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media_gallery.asp?media_category_id=20&page=9 (accessed 12 January 2009).Google Scholar
Hastings, M., and Jenkins, S.. 1983. The Battle for the Falklands. New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Hayton, R. 1956. The ‘American’ Arctic. American Journal of International Law 50 (3): 583–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, I.L. 1963–1964. Canadian claims to territorial sovereignty in the Arctic regions. McGill Law Journal 9: 200–226.Google Scholar
Hobbs, W.H. 1932. Wilkes Land rediscovered. Geographical Review 22 (4): 632–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, N.C. 1988. Breaking the ice: the Canadian-American dispute over the Arctic's Northwest Passage. Columbia Journal of Translational Law 26: 337–375.Google Scholar
Hyde, C.C. 1945. International law chiefly as interpreted and applied by the United States. Vol I. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T., and Stone, I.R.. 2006. Kolbeinsey: Iceland's Arctic island. Polar Record 42 (221): 167–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, C.C. 1992. Antarctica and the law of the sea. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindred, H.M., Saunders, P.M., Brunnée, J., Currie, R.J., McDorman, T.L., de Mestral, A.L.C., Mickelson, K., Provost, R., Reif, L.C., Toope, S.J., and Williams, S.A.. 2006. International law, chiefly as interpreted and applied in Canada. 7th edition. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Kraska, J. 2007. The law of the sea convention and the Northwest Passage. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 22 (2): 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeGresley, E. 1993. The law of the sea convention. Ottawa: Parliament of Canada.Google Scholar
Lalonde, S. 2004. Increasing traffic through Canadian Arctic waters. Revue judiciaire Thémis 38 (1), 49–124.Google Scholar
MacIntosh, J.A. 1946. ‘Rockall’: the most isolated speck of rock, surrounded by water, on the surface of the Earth. Oban: Hugh MacDonald Ltd.Google Scholar
May, E. 2008. The fabled Northwest Passage: global warming, Canadian sovereignty and the shortest Europe-Asia shipping route. Presentation to the American Bar Association International Justice Spring Meeting.Google Scholar
McClure, J. 2004. The Falklands war: causes and lessons. Strategic Insights 3: 11. URL: http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2004/nov/mcclureNov04.pdf (accessed 13 May 2009).Google Scholar
McRae, D. 2007. Arctic sovereignty? What's at stake? Behind the Headlines 64 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.I., Randers, J., and Behrens III, W.W.. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Mercopress. 2008. Argentina to present Antarctic and insular sea bed claims. 1 September 2008. URL: http://en.mercopress.com/2008/09/01/argentina-to-present-antarctic-and-insular-sea-bed-claims (accessed 13 May 2009).Google Scholar
Newton, A.W., Peach, K.J., Coull, K.A., Gault, M., and Needle, C.L.. 2008. Rockall and the Scottish haddock fishery. Fisheries Research 94 (2): 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbard, M.E., McDonald, T.L., Howe, E.J., Regehr, E.V., and Richardson, E.S.. 2007. Polar bear population status in southern Hudson Bay, Canada. Reston VA: United States Geological Survey (administrative report).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oil and Gas Journal. 2002. Proven reserves. Oil and Gas Journal December 2002.Google Scholar
Pharand, D. 1988. Canada's Arctic waters in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharand, D. 1989. Sovereignty in the Arctic: the international legal context and security in the Arctic. In: Dosman, E.J. (editor). Sovereignty and security in the Arctic. New York: Routledge: 145–158.Google Scholar
Quigg, P.W. 1983. A pole apart: the emerging issue of Antarctica. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Reeves, J.S. 1939. Antarctic sectors. The American Journal of International Law 33 (3): 519–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, G.H. 2009. Why a CPC government should resist the urge to tilt against Arctic windmills. Ottawa: Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (eDiscussion policy position paper, the Arctic). URL: http://www.international.gc.ca/cip-pic/discussions/arctic-arctique/policy-politique/rice.aspx?lang=eng (accessed 13 May 2009).Google Scholar
Roach, J.A., and Smith, R.W.. 1996. United States responses to excessive maritime claims. 2nd edition. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Roth, R.R. 1990. Sovereignty and jurisdiction over Arctic waters. Alberta Law Review 28 (3): 845–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruy-Pérez Benitez, O. 1991. Cuarenta anos de ‘mananitas campesinas’. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Somanathan, S., Flynn, P., and Szymanski, J.. 2009. The Northwest Passage: a simulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 43 (2): 127–135.Google Scholar
Space Daily. 2005. Canada looks to satellite to assert Arctic sovereignty. Space Daily 30 August 2005. URL: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Canada_Looks_To_Satellite_To_Assert_Arctic_Sovereignty.html (accessed 13 May 2009).Google Scholar
Symmons, C.R. 1979. The maritime zones of islands in international law. The Hague: Martinus. Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 2004. Breaking the ice; sovereignty over the Arctic. The Economist 372 (8389): 32.Google Scholar
Till, G. 2008. A cooperative strategy for 21st century seapower: a view from outside. Naval War College Review. 61 (2): 25–38.Google Scholar
UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). 1982. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. New York: United Nations (International Legal Materials 21 (6): 1261–1354).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States. 1975. United States v. Alaska, United States Reports 422: 184–205.Google Scholar
United States. 2008. Energy Information Administration. World proved reserves of oil and natural gas, Most recent estimates. 27 August 2008. URL: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/reserves.html (accessed 12 May 2009).Google Scholar
United States. 2009a. Energy Information Agency. Spot prices for crude oil and petroleum products. WTI – Cushing, OK: Energy Information Agency. 12 May 2009. URL: http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_spt_s1_d.htm (accessed 13 May 2009).Google Scholar
United States. 2009b. National security presidential directive/NSPD-66/ Homeland security presidential direction/HSPD-25. 9 January 2009. Washington DC: Office of the President of the United States.Google Scholar
United States. 2009c. U.S. Natural Gas Prices. Wellhead price (February 2009). Cushing, OK: Energy Information Agency URL: http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm (accessed 12 May 2009).Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Y. 2005. Okinotorishima: just the tip of the iceberg, Harvard Asia Quarterly 9 (4): 51–61.Google Scholar