Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:46:35.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges due to changing ideas of natural resources: tourism and power plant development in the Icelandic wilderness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2015

Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir  and
Jarkko Saarinen
Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Life and Environmental Science, University of Iceland ([email protected])
Jarkko Saarinen
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Oulu, P.O.Box 8000, FI–90014 Oulu, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Arctic and nearby remote areas are attracting more attention than ever before, because of their abundance of physical natural resources as well their wilderness environments which have become a major attraction for tourists. But use of land for tourism practices can lead to conflicts with other industries that utilise natural resources. Tourism in Iceland has grown rapidly in recent decades and nature and the wilderness is the main attraction. As well as being an important resource for the tourism industry, wilderness and natural areas are also very valuable for hydro–electric and geothermal power production. During the latter half of the last century several glacier–fed rivers in the highlands were dammed and hydropower plants built. Now there are plans for further exploitation of the natural resources which creates challenges and conflicts as many of the proposed power plants are located in natural areas, some of which are defined as wilderness. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the development of tourism in the Icelandic highlands and power production development and the challenges created by the changing idea of natural resources. It discusses a governmental project which is intended to solve the challenging conflicts about the use of natural areas. The project exposed the fact that the energy resources in the country are a far more limited resource than has previously been assumed. The power production industry now has to share the limited natural resources with the tourism industry. Thereby the ideas about natural resources and their utilisation are being re–defined by Icelandic society, depending on technology, global influences and other social trends.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 82 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alþingi 1999. 123. löggjafarþing. Þingskjal 848 – 528. mál. Lög um náttúruvernd nr. 44/1999 [The 123 legislative assembly A. Parliament paper 848 – 528. case. Nature Conservation Act no. 44/1999]. URL: http://www.althingi.is/lagas/138b/1999044.html (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Alþingi 2010. Þingsályktun um áætlun um ferðamennsku á miðhálendi Íslands. [The 138st legislative assembly 2009–2010. A. Parliament paper 1474 – 19. case. Parliamentary resolution on tourism policy for the Central Highlands of Iceland] URL: http://www.althingi.is/altext/138/s/1474.html (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Alþingi. 2013. 141. löggjafarþing. Þingskjal 892 – 89. mál. Þingsályktun um áætlun um vernd og orkunýtingu landsvæða. [The 141st legislative assembly A. Parliament paper 892 – 89. case. Parliamentary resolution on protection and utilitation of regions]. Reykjavík: Alþingi. URL: http://www.althingi.is/altext/141/s/0892.html (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Alþingi 2005. 131. löggjafarþing. Þingskjal 1032–638. mál. Tillaga til þingsályktunar um ferðamál [The 131st legislative assembly A. Parliament paper 1032–638. case. Parliamentary resolution on tourism.] URL: http://www.althingi.is/altext/131/s/1032.html (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Anon. (Anonymous). 2011. Orkustefna fyrir Ísland [Power policy for Iceland]. Reykjavík: Ministry of Industry. URL: http://www.nea.is/media/gagnasofn/Orkustefna-fyrir-Island.pdf (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Arnarson, H. 2012. Arður í orku framtíðar [Profits in the energy of the future]. Reykjavik: Annual meeting of the National Power Company. URL: http://www.landsvirkjun.is/Fyrirtaekid/Fjolmidlatorg/Vidburdir/Haustfundur2012 (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Arnórsson, S. 2012. Eðli og endurnýjanleiki jarðvarmakerfa [The nature and renewability of geothermal systems]. Náttúrufræðingurinn 82 (1–4): 49–72.Google Scholar
Arnórsson, S., Axelsson, G. and Sæmundsson, K.. 2008. Geothermal systems in Iceland. Jökull 58: 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Árnason, T. 2005. Views of nature and environmental concern in Iceland. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Linköbing: Linköbings Universitet, Institutionen för Tema.Google Scholar
Björnsson, J. 1970. Um náttúruvernd með sérstöku tilliti til virkjana á Íslandi. Samvinnan 2: 23–27.Google Scholar
Björnsson, S. (editor). 2011. Niðurstöður 2. áfanga rammaáætlunar [Results from the 2nd phase of the master plan]. Reykjavík: Steering committee for the master plan for geothermal and hydropower and the ministry of industry. URL: http://www.atvinnuvegaraduneyti.is/media/Acrobat/Rammaaaetlun-1.pdf (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Callicott, J.B. 2000. Contemporary criticisms of the received wilderness idea. Missoula, MT.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (Wilderness science in a time of change, 23–27 May 1999).Google Scholar
Callicott, J.B. and Nelson, M.P.. 1998. Introduction. In: Callicott, J.B. and Nelson, M.P. (editor), The great new wilderness debate. Athens GA: University of Georgia Press: 1–22.Google Scholar
Castree, N. 2005. Nature, key ideas in geography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. and Hall, T.E.. 2008. Wilderness visitors, experiences, and management preferences: how they vary with use level and length of stay. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (Research paper RP–71).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, W. 1998. The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In: Cronon, W. (editor), Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W. W. Norton & Co: 69–90.Google Scholar
Gísladóttir, G. 2005. The impact of tourist trampling on Icelandic andosols. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 143: 55–73.Google Scholar
Guha, R. 1998. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: a third world critique. In: Callicott, J.B. and Nelson, M.P. (editor). The great new wilderness debate. Athens GA: The University of Georgia Press: 231–245.Google Scholar
Gössling, S. and Hall, C.M.. 2006. Tourism and global environmental change: ecological, social, economic, and political interrelationships. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hagfræðistofnun. 2013. Þjóðhagsleg áhrif sæstrengs [The impact of a submarine cable on the national economy]. Reykjavík: Hagfræðistofnun (C–series C13:03). URL: http://hhi.hi.is/sites/hhi.hi.is/files/C-Series/2013/C13_03.pdf (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Hall, C.M. 1992. Wasteland to world heritage: preserving Australia's wilderness. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C.M. and Shultis, J.. 1991. Railways, tourism, worthless lands: the establishment of national parks in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. Australian Canadian Studies 8 (2): 57–74.Google Scholar
Hall, C.M. and Saarinen, J.. 2010. Tourism and change in the polar regions: Introduction – definitions, locations, places and dimensions. In: Hall, C.M. and Saarinen, J. (editor), Tourism and change in the polar tegions: climate, environment and experiences London: Routledge: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C.M. and Page, S.J.. 2014. The geography of tourism and recreation: environment, place and space. 4th Edn.London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T.E. and Cole, D.N.. 2007. Displacement and coping in wilderness. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (Research paper).Google Scholar
Hallikainen, V. 2000. The Finnish ‘social wilderness’. Missoula, MT.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (Wilderness science in a time of change, 23–27 May 1999).Google Scholar
Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H. and Lucas, R.C.. 1990. Wilderness management. 2nd Edn.Golden, Colorado: North American Press.Google Scholar
Howard, R. 2009. The Arctic gold rush: the new race for tomorrow's natural resources London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hreinsson, E.B. 2007. Deregulation, environmental and planning policy in the Icelandic energy system. Proceedings Clean Electrical Power. 7: 283–290.Google Scholar
Hughes, T., P. 1983. Networks of power: electrification in western society 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijbens, E.H. and Benediktsson, K.. 2007. Practising highland heterotopias: Automobility in the interior of Iceland. Mobilities 2 (1): 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijbens, E.H. and Benediktsson, K.. 2013. Inspiring the visitor? Landscapes and horizons of hospitality. Tourist Studies 1 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Icelandic Tourist Board. 2012. International visitors in Iceland: visitor survey summer 2011. Reykjavík: Icelandic Tourist Board.Google Scholar
Icelandic Tourist Board. 2014. Heildarfjöldi erlendra gesta 1949–2014 [The total number of foreign guests 1949–2014]. Reykjavík: Icelandic Tourist Board.Google Scholar
Icelandic Tourist Industry Association 2012. Frá aðalfundi SAF 2012 [News from the annual meeting of the Icelandic Tourist Industry Association]. URL: http://saf.is/saf/is/?ew_news_onlyarea=newscontent&ew_news_onlyposition=4&cat_id=33921&ew_4_a_id=388379 (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Irwin, W. 1996. The new Niagara: tourism, technology, and the landscape of Niagara Falls, 1776–1917. Pittsburgh: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, B.J., Hall, T.E. and Cole, D.N.. 2005. Naturalness, primitiveness, remoteness and wilderness: wilderness visitors’ understanding and experience of wilderness qualities. Missoula MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute. URL: URL: http://leopold.wilderness.net/unpublished/UNP115.pdf. (accessed 3 March 2015)Google Scholar
Jónsson, Á., Hauksson, G., Jónsson, J.G. and Þorgeirsson, L.Þ.. 2013. Sæstrengur og hagur heimila. Greining áhrifa sæstrengs á afkomu heimila landsins.[Submarine cable and welfare of the households. An analyses of the impact of a submarine cable on the financial standing of the households in the country] (editor A. Jónsson). Reykjavík. GAM Management hf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsdóttir, U.B. 2010. Þar sem fossarnir falla. Náttúrusýn og nýting fallvatna á Íslandi 1900–2008 [Where the waterfalls fall. The view of nature and the use of hydro power in Iceland 1900–2008]. Reykjavík: Hið íslenzka fornritafélag.Google Scholar
Karlsson, G. 2000. Iceland's 1100 years. The history of a marginal society. London: C. Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Landsvirkjun. 2011. Ársskýrsla Landsvirkjunar 2010 [Yearly report from Landsvirjun for 2010]. Reykjavík: Landsvirkjun. URL: http://www.landsvirkjun.is/media/2011/LV_arsskyrsla_2011.pdf (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Landsvirkjun. 2013. Research and development. Research. Submarine Cable to Europe. URL: http://www.landsvirkjun.com/researchdevelopment/research/submarinecabletoeurope (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Laxnes, H. 1970. Hernaðurinn gegn landinu [Terror against the land]. Morgunblaðið. 31 December 1970. 279: 10–11.Google Scholar
Lesslie, R.G. and Taylor, S.G.. 1983. The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for Australian wilderness preservation policy. Biological Conservation 32 (4): 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesslie, R.G., Maslen, M., Canty, D., Goodwins, D. and Shields, R.. 1991. National wilderness inventory: South Australia, wilderness on Kangaroo Island. Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J.. 1998. Contested natures: theory, culture and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Manning, R.E. 1999. Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction. 2nd Edn.Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry for the Environment. 2002. Welfare for the future. Iceland's national strategy for sustainable development 2002–2020 2002. URL: http://eng.umhverfisraduneyti.is/media/PDF_skrar/Sjalfbar__roun_enska.pdf. (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Ministry for the Environment. 2011. Hvítbók um löggjöf til verndar náttúru Íslands [White book on nature protection law in Iceland]. (editor A.V. Óskarsdóttir). Reykjavík: Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
Ministry for the Environment and the National Planning Agency. 1999. The central highlands, regional plan 2015 [Miðhálendi Íslands, Svæðisskipulag 2015]. Reykjavík: Ministry for the Environment and The National Planning Agency.Google Scholar
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources. 2013. Rammaáætlun samþykkt [The Master Plan approved]. Reykjavik: Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
Ministry of Transport. 2006. Ferðamálaáætlun 2006–2015 [Tourism plan 2006–2015]. URL: http://www.samgonguraduneyti.is/media/Skyrsla/Ferdamalaaatlun_2006-2015_LOKA_11_2005.pdf (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Nash, R. 2014. Wilderness and the American mind. 5th Edn.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
National Planning Agency. 2012. Landsskipulagsstefna 2013–2024. Samræmdstefna ríkisins um skipulagsmál. Miðhálendið, búsetumynsturog skipulag á haf–og strandsvæðum. [National planning strategy 2013–2024. Coherent governmental policy regarding planning issues for the central highlands, settlement and marine areas]. Reykjavík: National Planning Agency.Google Scholar
O’Riordan, T. 1990. On the ‘greening’ of major projects. Geographical Journal 156: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ólafsdóttir, R. and Runnstrom, M.C.. 2011. How wild is Iceland? Assessing wilderness quality with respect to nature based tourism. Tourism Geographies 13 (2): 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ólafsdóttir, R. and Runnstrom, M.C.. 2013. Assessing hiking trails condition in two popular tourist destinations in the Icelandic highlands. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 3–4: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragnarsson, Á. 2005. Geothermal development in Iceland 2000–2004. Antalya: World Geothermal Congress. (Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress. 24–29 April, 2005, Antalya, Turkey): 1–11. URL: http://www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/WGC/2005/0176.pdf (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Sewell, D. and Dumbrell, J.. 1989. Wilderness decisionmaking and the role of environmental interest groups: a comparison of the Franklin Dam, Tasmania and South Moresby, British Columbia cases. Natural Resources Journal. 29 (1): 147–169.Google Scholar
Statistics Iceland 2013a. Iðnaður og orkumál. Orkumál. Stóriðja og almenn notkun raforku 1960–2011 [Industry and power production. Power production. The electrical use of the power intensive industry and the general public]. Reykjavik: Statistics Iceland. URL: http://hagstofa.is/Hagtolur/Idnadur-og-orkumal/Orkumal. (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Statistics Iceland 2013b. Ferðamál, samgöngur og upplýsingatækni. Ferðaþjónusta. Útflutningur vöru og þjónustu eftir atvinnugreinum 1990–2010 [Tourism, transportation and information technology. Tourism industry. Export of goods and services by industries]. Reykjavik: Statistics Iceland. URL: http://hagstofa.is/Hagtolur/Ferdamal-samgongur-uppltaekni/Ferdathjonusta (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. 2010a. Planning nature tourism in Iceland based on tourist attitudes. Tourism Geographies 12 (1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. 2010b. Tourism struggling as the wilderness is developed. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 10 (3): 334–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. 2012a. Tourism in the central–highlands. Current situation and future expectations [Ferðamennska á miðhálendi Íslands: Staða og spá um framtíðarhorfur]. Reykjavík: University of Iceland, Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences.Google Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. 2012b. Tourism and power plant development: an attempt to solve land use conflicts. Tourism Planning and Development 9 (4): 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. 2013. Managing popularity: changes in tourist attitudes to a wilderness destination. Tourism Management Perspectives 7: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. 2014. Preserving wilderness at an emerging tourist destination. Journal of Management and Sustainability 4 (3)65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. and Ólafsson, R.. 2010a. Nature tourism assessment in the Icelandic master plan for geothermal and hydropower development. Part I: Rapid evaluation of nature tourism resources. Journal of Heritage Tourism 5 (4): 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. and Ólafsson, R.. 2010b. Nature tourism assessment in the Icelandic master plan for geothermal and hydropower development. Part II: Assessing the impact of proposed power plants on tourism and recreation. Journal of Heritage Tourism 5 (4): 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. and Ólafsson, R.. 2012. Áhrif Hólmsárvirkjunar á ferðamennsku og útivist [The effect of the proposed power plant Hómsárvirkjun on tourism and recreation]. Reykjavík: Landsvirkjun og Orkusalan.Google Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D., Hall, C.M. and Saarinen, J.. 2011. Making wilderness: tourism and the history of the wilderness idea in Iceland. Polar Geography 34 (4): 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, C. 1998. The wilderness narrative and the cultural logic of capitalism. In: Callicott, J.B. and Nelson, M.P. (editor), The great new wilderness debate. Athens GA: The University of Georgia Press: 325–336.Google Scholar
Taylor, V.F. 2011. GIS assessment of Icelandic wilderness from 1936–2010. Unpublished MS dissertation. Reykjavik: University of Iceland. URL: http://skemman.is/item/view/1946/9876 (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Thórhallsdóttir, T.E. 2002. Evaluating nature and wilderness in Iceland. In Wilderness in the circumpolar north: searching for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism values. Edited by Watson, A.E., Alessa, L. and , J. Sproull. Ogden, UT: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p026/rmrs_p026_096_104.pdf (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Thórhallsdóttir, T.E. 2007a. Environment and energy in Iceland: A comparative analysis of values and impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (6): 522–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thórhallsdóttir, T.E. 2007b. Strategic planning at the national level: Evaluating and ranking energy projects by environmental impact. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (6): 545–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Energy Information Administration. 2013. International energy statistics. Renewables. Electricity eeneration. Europe. Total renewables electricity generation. URL: http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=6&pid=29&aid=12# (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
UNWTO (World Tourism Organization) 2013. Tourism Highlights. Madrid: UNWTO. URL: http://dtxtq4w60xqpw.cloudfront.net/sites/all/files/pdf/unwto_highlights14_en.pdf (accessed 5 March 2015).Google Scholar
Williams, D.R. 2002. The social construction of arctic wilderness: place meanings, value pluralism, and globalization. Anchorage AK: University of Alaska (Paper read at Wilderness in the circumpolar north: searching for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism, values. 15–17 May 2001, at University of Alaska, Anchorage).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, E.W. 1951. World resources and industries. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar