Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:40:00.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The breeding and maintenance of sledge dogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

R. J. F. Taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the logical reasons for exploration is to collect the maximum of information in a specified time; therefore planning should be based on an appreciation of the pregnable gaps in as many fields of science as possible. Present Antarctic exploration is neglecting the biological sciences and in particular those of an experimental nature. Figures published for the contingents from the British Commonwealth, France and Norway at present in Antarctica include twenty-three physicists, thirteen geologists of different varieties and only two biologists. This neglect probably arises from a too rigid conception that field biology is concerned with classification and with natural history. Antarctica, however, offers great possibilities, and even certain advantages, for much biological work, and in particular its simplicity helps ecological thought and nutritional experimentation.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 8 , Issue 56 , May 1957 , pp. 429 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Trans-Antarctic Expedition, 1955–58, and The International Geophysical Year, 1957–58. Polar Record, Vol. 8, No. 55, 1957, p. 356–61.Google Scholar
2Taylor, R. J. F.. The physiology of sledge dogs. Polar Record, Vol. 8, No. 55, 1957, p. 317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Young, S. P., and Goldman, E. A.. The wolves of North America. Washington, 1944.Google Scholar
4J. M., Wordie. The Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, 1943–46. Polar Record, Vol. 4, No. 32, 1947, p. 372–84.Google Scholar
5Bingham, E. W.. The Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, 1946–47. Polar Record, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1947, p. 27–39.Google Scholar
6Fuchs, V. E.. Exploration in British Antarctica. Geographical Journal, Vol. 117, No. 4, 1951, p. 399–421.Google Scholar
7Croft, A.. West Greenland sledge dogs. Polar Record, Vol. 2, No. 13, 1937, p. 68–81.Google Scholar
8Hubbard, C. L. B.. Working dogs of the world. London, 1947, p. 175.Google Scholar
9Adie, R. J.. The 1949–51 dog report from Base E (Stonington Island) of the Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey. Unpublished.Google Scholar
10Reece, A.. Sledge dogs of the Norwegian-British-Swedish Antarctic Expedition, 1949–52. Polar Record, Vol. 7, No. 47, 1954, p. 32–37.Google Scholar
11Adie, R. J.. Sledge dogs of the Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, 1947–50. Polar Record, Vol. 6, No. 45, 1953, p. 631–41.Google Scholar
12Bingham, E. W.. Sledging and sledge dogs. Polar Record, Vol. 3, No. 21, 1941, p. 367–85.Google Scholar
13Bowden, F. P.. Friction on snow and ice. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Vol. 217, 1953, p. 462–78.Google Scholar
14Hediger, H.. Wild animals in captivity. London, 1950, p. 158.Google Scholar
15Burns, M.. The genetics of the dog. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Slough, 1952, p. 12.Google Scholar
16Taylor, R. J. F., Worden, A. N., and Waterhouse, C. E.. The sledging rations of sledge dogs. British Journal of Nutrition (in the Press).Google Scholar
17Taylor, R. J. F.. The work output of sledge dogs. Journal of Physiology (in the Press).Google Scholar
18Swithinbank, C.. Mechanical transport of the Norwegian-British-Swedish Antarctic Expedition, 1949–52. Polar Record, Vol. 6, No. 46, 1953, p. 765–74.Google Scholar
19 The Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, 1954–55. Polar Record, Vol. 8, No. 54, 1956, p. 260–64.Google Scholar