Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:16:43.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Australia and the Convention for the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities (CRAMRA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

S. K. N. Blay  and
B. M. Tsamenyi
S. K. N. Blay
Affiliation:
Law School and The Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania 7001, Australia
B. M. Tsamenyi
Affiliation:
Law School and The Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania 7001, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Australia, a leading Antarctic state that played a key role in negotiating the Convention for the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities, in May 1989 announced its opposition to the Convention and adoption instead of a World Park or Wilderness Reserve concept for Antarctica. This article examines possible environmental and economic reasons for Australia's attitude, which is likely to have significant implications for the future of the Convention and for the Antarctic Treaty System as a whole.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 26 , Issue 158 , July 1990 , pp. 195 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antarctic Briefing. 1987. Status of Antarctic minerals negotiations. Washington, Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition.Google Scholar
Australian Foreign Affairs Record. 1988. Australian Foreign Affairs Record. Canberra, Government of Australia.Google Scholar
Beck, P. J. 1989. Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities: a major addition to the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Record 25 (152): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blay, S. K. N. and Tsamenyi, B. M. 1989. The Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities: can a claimant veto it? Hobart, University of Tasmania Law School. (Antarctic and Southern Ocean Law and Policy Occasional Papers, 1)Google Scholar
Conservation News. 1989. Antarctica — a great victory. Conservation News (Newsletter of the Australian Conservation Foundation) 21 (5) 06.Google Scholar
Hansard. 1989. Commonwealth of Australia Parliamentary Debates, Senate. Canberra, Government of Australia.Google Scholar
Ministerial Document Service. 1989. Daily collation of Ministers' and Opposition Leaders' statements, No 230/88–89, 28 06. Canberra, Government of Australia.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 1988. Antarctica, miners cast their eyes on a glittering prize. Habitat (Australia) 16 (08): 20.Google Scholar
New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1988a. Final report of the Fourth Special Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting on Antarctic Mineral Resources. AMR/SCM/88/79 (2 June 1988). Wellington, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1988b. Final Act of the Fourth Special Antarctic Consultative Meeting on Antarctic Mineral Resources. AMR/SCM/88/79 (2 June 1988). Wellington, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Polar Record. 1989. Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities. Polar Record 25 (154): 264–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Australian. 1989a. Cabinet kills Antarctic Treaty. The Australian 23 05.Google Scholar
The Australian. 1989b. Antarctica worth a try. The Australian 24 05.Google Scholar
Wilderness News. 1989. Wilderness News (Newsletter of the Australian Wilderness Society) 10 (07): 15.Google Scholar