Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:20:26.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arctic summer sea-ice SAR signatures, melt-season characteristics, and melt-pond fractions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

M. O. Jeffries ,
K. Schwartz  and
S. Li
M. O. Jeffries
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Drive, PO Box 757320, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA
K. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Drive, PO Box 757320, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA
S. Li
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Drive, PO Box 757320, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variations in multiyear sea-ice backscatter from the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aboard the ERS-1 satellite are interpreted in terms of melt-season characteristics (onset of melt in spring and of freeze-up in autumn, and the duration of the snow-decay period, the melt season, and the melt-pond season) from late winter to early autumn 1992 in two regions of the Arctic Ocean: the northeastern Beaufort Sea adjacent to the Queen Elizabeth Islands in the Canadian high Arctic and the western Beaufort Sea north of Alaska. In the northeastern Beaufort Sea, the onset of melt occurs later, and the periods of snow-cover decay and the occurrence of melt ponds are shorter than in the western Beaufort Sea. These melt-season characteristics of each area are consistent with previous observations that the northeastern Beaufort Sea has one of the most severe summer climates in the Arctic Ocean. A model, which assumes that the backscatter from multiyear floes is the sum of backscatter from bare ice and melt ponds, is used to derive the melt-pond fraction during the summer. The results show that melt-pond fractions decrease from an early-summer maximum of about 60% to a late-summer minimum around 10%. The magnitude of the melt-pond fractions and their decline during the summer is consistent with previous, more qualitative data. The SAR model, which gives melt-pond fractions with lower variability and less uncertainty than previous data, offers an improved approach to the reliable estimation of the areal extent of water on ice floes. Suggestions for further improvement of the model include accounting for the consequences of wind-speed variations, summer snowfall, and freeze/thaw cycles and their effects on melt-pond and ice-surface roughness.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 33 , Issue 185 , April 1997 , pp. 101 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, B.T., and Maxwell, B.. 1990. The Queen Elizabeth Islands: a case study for Arctic climate data availability and regional climate analysis. In: Harington, C.R. (editor). Canada's missing dimension: science and history in the Canadian Arctic islands. Ottawa: Canadian Museum of Nature: 294–326.Google Scholar
Askne, J., Ulander, L.M.H., Carlström, A., Sun, Yan, and Pettersson, M.. 1994. Validation of ERS-1 SAR for Arctic ice properties from ARCTIC-91. In: Space at the service of our environment: proceedings of the second ERS-1 symposium, 11–14 October 1993, Hamburg, Germany. Paris: European Space Agency (ESA SP-361): 257–262.Google Scholar
Barry, R.G., Serreze, M.C., and Maslanik, J.A.. 1993. The Arctic sea ice–climate system: observations and modeling. Reviews of Geophysics 31 (4): 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaven, S.G., and Gogineni, S.P.. 1994. Shipborne radar backscatter measurements from Arctic sea ice during the fall freeze-up. Remote Sensing Reviews 9: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicknell, T. 1992. Alaska SAR Facility SAR processor system: user's guide to products. Pasadena, California: NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL Publication D-9362).Google Scholar
Bourke, R.H., and McLaren, A.S.. 1992. Contour mapping of Arctic Basin ice draft and roughness parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research 97 (C11): 17,715–17,728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlström, A., and Ulander, L.M.. 1993. C-band backscatter of old sea ice in the central Arctic during freeze-up. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 31 (4): 819–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colony, R., and Thorndike, A.. 1985. Sea ice motion as a drunkard's walk. Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (1): 965–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curlander, J.C., and McDonough, R.N.. 1991. Synthetic aperture radar: systems and signal processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. 1995. Airborne and satellite SAR investigations of sea-ice surface characteristics. In: Ikeda, M., and Dobson, F.W. (editors). Oceanographic applications of remote sensing. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press: 339–357.Google Scholar
Ebert, E.E., and Curry, J.A.. 1993. An intermediate onedimensional thermodynamic sea ice model for investigating ice-atmosphere interactions. Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (C6): 10,085–10,109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, S.A., and Alt, B.T.. 1989. Regional congruence of vegetation and summer climate patterns in the Queen Elizabeth Islands, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic 42 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Canada. 1992. Climate Perspectives: A Weekly Review of Canadian Climate and Weather 14 (14–20 09): 1.Google Scholar
Fatland, R., and Freeman, A.. 1992. Calibration and change detection of ASF/ERS-1 SAR image data. In: Williamson, R. (editor). International space year: space remote sensing: proceedings of IGARSS '92symposium, Houston, Texas, 26–29 May 1992. Piscatawny, NJ: Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers: II, 1164–1166.Google Scholar
Gogineni, S.P., Moore, R.K., Grenfell, T.C., Barber, D.G., Digby, S., and Drinkwater, M.. 1992. The effects of freezeup and melt processes on microwave signatures. In: Carsey, F. (editor). Microwave remote sensing of sea ice. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union (Geophysical Monograph 68): 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenfell, T.C, and Maykut, G.A.. 1977. The optical properties of ice and snow in the Arctic basin. Journal of Glaciology 18 (80): 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, A. M. 1980. The snow cover of sea ice during the Arctic Ice Dynamics Joint Experiment, 1975 to 1976. Arctic and Alpine Research 12 (2): 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, B., Cunningham, G., and Kwok, R.. 1993. Sea ice radar signatures from ERS-1 during late summer and fall in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. In: Space at the service of our environment: proceedings of the first ERS-1 symposium, Cannes, France. Paris: European Space Agency (ESA SP-359): 339–342.Google Scholar
Johannesen, O.M., Miles, M. and Bjørgo, E.. 1995. The Arctic's shrinking sea ice. Nature 376 (6536): 126–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, W. 1975. Climatic feedback mechanisms involving the polar regions. In: Weller, G., and Bowling, S.A. (editors). Climate of the Arctic. Fairbanks: Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska: 111–116.Google Scholar
Kwok, R., and Cunningham, G.F.. 1994. Backscatter characteristics of the winter sea ice cover in the Beaufort Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (C4): 7787–7802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langleben, M. P. 1969. Albedo and degree of puddling of a melting cover of sea ice. Journal of Glaciology 9 (54): 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langleben, M.P. 1971. Albedo of melting sea ice in the southern Beaufort Sea. Journal of Glaciology 10 (58): 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maykut, G.A. 1986. The surface heat and mass balance. In: Untersteiner, N. (editor). The geophysics of sea ice. New York and London: Plenum Press: 395–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onstott, R.G., and Gogineni, S.P.. 1985. Active microwave measurements of Arctic sea ice under summer conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (C3): 5035–5044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onstott, R.G., Grenfell, T.C., Mätzler, C., Luther, C.A., and Svendsen, E.A.. 1987. Evolution of microwave signatures of sea ice signatures during early summer and midsummer in the marginal ice zone. Journal of Geophysical Research 92 (C7): 6825–6835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.A., Serreze, M.C., Barry, R.G., Scharfen, G., and Kukla, G.. 1992. Large scale patterns and variability of snowmelt and parameterized surface albedo in the Arctic basin. Journal of Climate 5 (10): 1109–1119.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, K. 1994. Variations in the state of the Arctic Ocean sea-ice surface from late winter to fall determined from ERS-1 SAR data. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Schwartz, K., Jeffries, M.O., and Li, S.. 1994. Using ERS-1 SAR data to monitor the state of the Arctic Ocean seaice surface between spring and autumn, 1992. In: Stein, T.I. (editor). Surface and atmospheric remote sensing: technologies, data analysis and interpretation: proceedings of IGARSS '94 symposium, 8–12 August 1994, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Piscatawny, NJ: Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers: III, 1759–1762.Google Scholar
Serreze, M.C, Maslanik, J., Key, J. R., Kodaly, R.F., and Robinson, D.A.. 1995. Diagnosis of the record minimum in Arctic sea-ice area during 1990 and associated snow cover extremes. Geophysical Research Letters 22 (16): 2183–2186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, J., and Dozier, J.. 1995. Inferring snow wetness using C-band data from SIR–C's polarimetric synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 33 (4): 905–914.Google Scholar
Shine, K.P., and Henderson-Sellers, A.. 1985. The sensitivity of a thermodynamic sea ice model to changes in surface albedo parameterization. Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (D1): 2243–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulaby, F.T., Moore, R.K., and Fung, A.K.. 1981. Microwave remote sensing: active and passive. Volume II: Radar remote sensing and surface scattering and emission theory. Norwood, Massachusetts: Artech House.Google Scholar
Winebrenner, D.P., Nelson, E.D., and Colony, R.. 1994. Observation of melt onset on multiyear Arctic sea ice using ERS-1 SAR. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (C11): 22, 425–22,441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winebrenner, D. P., Holt, B., and Nelson, E.D.. 1996. Observation of autumn freeze-up in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas using ERS-1 SAR. Journal of Geophysical Research 101 (C7): 16,401–16,419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar