Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:10:49.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antarctic arms control as past precedent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2019

Ryan A. Musto*
Affiliation:
Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, Security Studies Program, Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, E40-474, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Ryan A. Musto, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The 1959 Antarctic Treaty made Antarctica the world’s first and only demilitarised continent, the world’s first denuclearised zone, and pioneered a comprehensive inspections system. This article explores Antarctic arms control as past precedent. It finds that the United States, which spearheaded the Antarctic Treaty negotiations, initially rationalised arms control in Antarctica as an isolated endeavour. Yet its potential elsewhere quickly appealed to various officials involved in the treaty negotiations and aligned with public perception. Subsequent initiatives for arms control took broad inspiration from the Antarctic Treaty, but regional differences limited specific adaptations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Address by President Dwight Eisenhower to UN General Assembly. (1960). Retrieved from: https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/io/potusunga/207330.htm Google Scholar
Antarctic Treaty. (1959). Retrieved from: https://www.ats.aq/e/ats.htm Google Scholar
Beck, P. J. (2012). No longer “A Pole Apart”: Antarctica 100 years on from Captain Scott. The Historian, 114, 1621.Google Scholar
Casey, R. (1959). International – Antarctica – Report by RG Casey on Antarctic Conference, Washington 1959, M4081, 6/1, October 1959 – December 1959, National Archives of Australia (NAA).Google Scholar
Comisión Preparatoria Para La Desnuclearización de la América Latina (COPREDAL) Records. (1965–1967). Provided by el Organismo para la Proscripción de las Armas Nucleares en la América Latina y el Caribe. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Dembling, P. G., & Arons, D. M. (1967). The evolution of the outer space treaty. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 33, 419456.Google Scholar
Dodds, K. (2012). The Antarctic: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editorial. (1960). The dawn of a new decade. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 16(1), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eighteen Nation Committee on Disarmament (ENDC) Records. University of Michigan Digital Library. Retrieved from: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?page=browse&c=endc Google Scholar
Farley, P. J. (1959). Memorandum to P.C. Daniels. 9 April 1959. Antarctica, 1959, 1960. Subject Files, 1959–1962. Executive Office of the President. Office of Science and Technology. Record Group 359. National Archives and Records Administration. College Park.Google Scholar
Haig, A. (1969). Memorandum to Kissinger. 25 March 1969. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1969–1972, E-2, doc. 79.Google Scholar
Hamel-Green, M. (2015). Antinuclear campaigning and the South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone (Rarotonga) Treaty, 1960–85. In Deery, P. & Kimber, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Biennial Labour History Conference (pp. 5162). Melbourne: Australian Society for the Study of Labour History.Google Scholar
Musto, R. A. (2018). Cold calculations: The United States and the creation of Antarctica’s atom-free zone. Diplomatic History, 42(4) 640668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outer Space Treaty. (1967). Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies. Retrieved from: http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/gares/ARES_21_2222E.pdf Google Scholar
Paine, T. (2018). Bombs in orbit? Verification and violation under the outer space treaty. The Space Review.Retrieved 19 March 2018 from: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/3454/1 Google Scholar
Quigg, P. W. (1983). A Pole Apart: The Emerging Issue of Antarctica. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Record of Meeting of the Committee of Principles. (1968). 3 June 1968, FRUS, 1964–1968, XI, doc. 242.Google Scholar
Rich, A., & Vinogradov, P. (1964). Arctic disarmament. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, M. (2010). Towards an Arctic nuclear-weapon-free zone – Towards a nuclear weapon free world. In Vestergaard, C. (Ed.), Conference on an Arctic Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Zone, 10–11 August, 2009 (pp. 1320). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
Seabed Treaty. (1971). Treaty on the prohibition of the emplacement of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction on the sea-bed and the ocean floor and in the subsoil thereof. Retrieved from: https://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/sea_bed Google Scholar
Serrano, M. (1992). Common Security in Latin America: The 1967 Treaty of Tlatelolco. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, B. (1989). Antarctic Treaty System Inspections: Historical Significance and Future Impact (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from: http://www.americanpolar.org/polar-compendium/ Google Scholar
Stavropolous, C. A. (1966). Memorandum to Thant. 22 June 1966. S-0858-0001-03. UN Archives. New York.Google Scholar
Templeton, M. (2006). Standing Upright Here: New Zealand in the Nuclear Age. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
The Conference on Antarctica. Conference Documents, the Antarctic Treaty and Related Papers. (1960). Washington: U.S. Government Publication Office.Google Scholar
Treaty of Tlatelolco. (1967). Treaty for the prohibition of nuclear weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from: http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/tlatelolco/text Google Scholar