Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:35:09.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances in engineered remediation for use in the Arctic and Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2006

D.M. Filler
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, PO Box 755900, Fairbanks, AK 99775-5900, USA ([email protected])
C.M. Reynolds
Affiliation:
United States Army Engineer Research Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
I. Snape
Affiliation:
Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia
A.J. Daugulis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
D.L. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, PO Box 755900, Fairbanks, AK 99775-5900, USA
P.J. Williams
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER

Abstract

Creative remediation schemes have been implemented with success at petroleum-contaminated sites in Alaska and Canada during the past decade. Contaminated media have been landfarmed, amended with fertilizers, augmented with microbial products, and manipulated with engineered systems. Phytoremediation developments and use of biodegradable synthetic and polymeric resins for potential use with petroleum and xenobiotic contaminants are on the horizon. Treatment of supra-permafrost water and melt-water runoff with permeable reactive barriers and partitioning bioreactors is now possible. Cost and time limitations will likely continue to drive remediation decisions in the Arctic. Environmental policy, environmental constraints, and cost will dictate what technologies are appropriate for Antarctic clean-up, although the pressure of time is less acute because land transfer and liability are not drivers. This paper discusses some recent advances in remediation engineering for use in polar regions. Conceptual models are presented, and case study treatment costs and durations are highlighted to aid environmental decision-making.

Type
Articles
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)