Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:09:52.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The way to the Antarctic Treaty: System of rules in times of global conflict

Part of: 60th anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2020

U. Rack Open the ORCID record for U. Rack [Opens in a new window]
U. Rack*
Affiliation:
Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
*
Author for correspondence: U. Rack, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1940, a PhD was published in Germany about the claiming behaviour of several countries and the whaling industry in Antarctica. It shows already at this time that a need for regulation on that issue was required. The intertwined relationships between the claiming nations demanded an overarching framework where these complex issues could be managed. This paper elaborates on the state of the claiming parties before the 1940s and will demonstrate that the development for a comprehensive regulation was the only way to avoid a global conflict. The doctoral thesis from 1940 will be the focal point of the discussion.

Keywords

Antarctic TreatyGerman thesis from 1940World War IIClaims
Type
Review Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 55 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 320 - 322
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This article is based on research for a poster presentation at the SCAR-OSC Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, 2018.

References

Ainley, D. G. (2010). A history of the exploitation of the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Polar Record, 46(238), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baare-Schmidt, H. G. (1940). Die territorialen Rechtsverhältnisse der Antarktis. Published PhD. Heidelberg: Ruprecht-Karl-Universität.Google Scholar
Basberg, B. L. (2004). The shore whaling station at South Georgia. A study in Antarctic industrial archaeology. Sandefjord: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Delbrück, J., & Wolfrum, R. (2002). Völkerrecht begründet von Georg Dahm. Der Staat und andere Völkerrechtssubjekte; Räume unter internationaler Verwaltung. Berlin: De Gruyter Recht.Google Scholar
Hart, I. (2001). Pesca. A history of the pioneer modern whaling company in the Antarctic. Devon: Aidan Ellis Publishing.Google Scholar
Hayton, R. D. (1959). National interests in Antarctica: An annotated bibliography: Compiled for the United States Antarctic Projects Officer, 1959. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library.Google Scholar
International convention for the regulation of whaling (1946). Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/m-ust000004-0248.pdf Google Scholar
Isachsen, G. (1929). Modern Norwegian whaling in the Antarctic. Geographical Review, 19/3, 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdecke, C., & Summerhayes, C. (2012) The third Reich in Antarctica. The German Antarctic expedition 1938–39. Norwich: Erskine Press and Hunntington: Bluntisham Books.Google Scholar
Norwegian sovereignty in the Antarctic. (1940). The American Journal of International Law, 34(2), 83–85. doi: 10.2307/2213599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, J. S. (1939). Antarctic sector. American Journal for International Law, 33, 519–521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, E., & Friede, W., (1939). Souveränitätsrechte in der Antarktis. Zeitschrift für ausländisches Recht und Völkerrecht, 9, 219–263. http://www.zaoerv.de Google Scholar
SPRI, MS 1213/4/; MS 1228/1–8; MS 1228/30/7–9. Correspondence between South Georgia whaling stations and the Falkland Islands dependency in Port Stanley.Google Scholar
Szalánczi, J. K. (2013). International relations of the German Antarctic Expedition 1938/39. Sovereignty dispute between Germany and Norway in the “Polar Desert”. Öt Kontinens, 2012/2, 131–141.Google Scholar