Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:06:56.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rise of Portuguese Antarctic research: implications for Portugal's status under the Antarctic Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2018

José C. Xavier Open the ORCID record for José C. Xavier [Opens in a new window] ,
Andrew D. Gray  and
Kevin A. Hughes
José C. Xavier
Affiliation:
Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE), Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3004–517, Coimbra, Portugal and British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK ([email protected])
Andrew D. Gray
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
Kevin A. Hughes
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Portugal has developed an active Antarctic programme over the past decade. Here, we examine Portuguese Antarctic activity using a variety of bibliometric measures, showing that Portuguese scientific output has grown substantially faster than the field as a whole, with quality remaining broadly constant. Antarctic science made up a growing percentage of overall Portuguese research, up to 0.14% of all papers in 2016—a level comparable to many other nations with well-established research programmes. Alongside this, Portugal has increasingly engaged in policy discussions and produced policy papers for Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings, some of which were based on Portuguese environmental science. The Antarctic Treaty reserves decision-making powers to ‘Consultative Parties’—those who have been recognised as demonstrating substantial research activity in the continent. Our data indicates that Portugal is currently the fourth most productive non-Consultative Party, and has similar or greater output than several Parties who have already attained consultative status—its publication record is similar to that of the Czech Republic, which became a Consultative Party in 2014. The rapid growth of Portugal's Antarctic research may make it well placed to consider attaining consultative status to the Antarctic Treaty in the near future.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). (2015). Portugal's Antarctic science and policy activities: a review (ATCM XXXVIII Information Paper 3). Retrieved from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_doc_database.aspx?lang=e&menu=2.Google Scholar
SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). (2016). Final report of the thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Santiago, Chile, 23 May–1 June 2016. Retrieved from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_finalrep.aspx?lang=e&menu=2.Google Scholar
SAT (Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty). (2017). Final report of the fortieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Beijing, China, 2 May–1 June 2017. Retrieved from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_finalrep.aspx?lang=e&menu=2.Google Scholar
Baeseman, J., Xavier, J. C., Lantuit, H., & Taylor, A. (2011). Early career researcher activities during the 4th International Polar Year. In: Krupnik, I., Allison, I., Bell, R., Culer, P., Hik, D., Lopez-Martinez, J., . . . Summerhayes, C. (Eds.), Understanding earth polar challenges: International Polar Year 2007–2008 (pp. 511–522). Rovaniemi: University of the Arctic/CCI Press.Google Scholar
Brady, A.-M. (2013). The emerging politics of Antarctica. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dastidar, P. (2007). National and institutional productivity and collaboration in Antarctic science: an analysis of 25 years of journal publications (1980–2004). Polar Research, 26, 175–180.Google Scholar
Dodds, K., Hemmings, A. D., & Roberts, P. (2017). Handbook on the politics of Antarctica. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Dudeney, J. R., & Walton, D. W. H. (2012). Leadership in politics and science within the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Research, 31, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. D., & Hughes, K. A. (2016). Demonstration of “substantial research activity” to acquire consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Research, 35, 34061.Google Scholar
Hughes, K. A., Liggett, D., Roldan, G., Wilmotte, A., & Xavier, J. C. (2016). Narrowing the science/policy gap for environmental management. Antarctic Science, 28, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, B., Zicus, S., & Allen, B. (Eds.). (2010). Polar science and global climate: an international resource for education & outreach. Harlow, Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Kennicutt II, M. C., Chown, S. L., Cassano, J., Liggett, D., Peck, L. S., Massom, R., . . . Sutherland, W. J. (2015). Future directions in Antarctic and Southern Ocean science: 1st SCAR Horizon Scan. Antarctic Science, 27, 3–18.Google Scholar
Kennicutt II, M. C., Chown, S. L., Cassano, J., Liggett, D., Massom, R., Peck, L. S., . . . Yang, H. (2014). Six priorities for Antarctic Science (and supplementary material). Nature, 512, 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnik, I., Allison, I., Bell, R., Cutler, P., Hik, D., López-Martinez, J., . . . Summerhayes, C. (2011). Understanding earth's polar challenges: International Polar Year 2007–2008 (Vol. 1). Rovaniemi: University of the Arctic/CCI Press.Google Scholar
May, I., Huffman, L. T., Xavier, J. C., & Walton, D. W. H. (2014). Education and polar research: bringing polar science into the classroom. Journal of geological resource and engineering, 4, 217–221.Google Scholar
Schiermeier, Q. (2009). In from the cold. Nature, 457, 1072–1077.Google Scholar
Xavier, J. C., Barbosa, A., Agusti, S., Alonso-Sáez, L., Alvito, P., Ameneiro, J., . . . Viñeglay, B. (2013). Polar marine biology science in Portugal and Spain: recent advances and future perspectives. Journal of Sea Research, 83, 9–29.Google Scholar
Xavier, J. C., Brandt, A., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Badhe, R., Gutt, J., Havermans, C., . . . Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Future challenges in Southern Ocean ecology research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00094.Google Scholar
Xavier, J. C., Fugmann, G., Beck, I., Huffman, L., & Jensen, E. (2016). Education on biodiversity in the Polar Regions. In: Castro, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Filho, W. L., & Azul, A. M. (Eds.). Biodiversity and education for sustainable development (pp. 43–56). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xavier, J. C., Vieira, G. T., & Canário, A. (2006). Portuguese science strategy for the International Polar Year (42 pp). Faro: Centre of Marine Sciences, University of Algarve.Google Scholar
Zicus, S., Almeida, M., Edwards, K., Hik, D., Huffman, L., Kaiser, B., . . . Xavier, J. C. (2011). IPY education activities. In: Krupnik, I., Allison, I., Bell, R., Cutler, P., Hik, D., López-Martinez, J., . . . Summerhayes, C. (Eds.). Understanding Earthś polar challenges: International Polar Year 2007–2008 (Vol. 1, pp. 481–496). Rovaniemi: University of the Arctic/CCI Press.Google Scholar