Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:55:51.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remediation of Arctic tundra following petroleum or salt water spills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Jeffery S. Conn
Affiliation:
State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 610 University Avenue, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA
Christina Behr-Andres
Affiliation:
AGRA Earth and Environmental Inc, 3504 Industrial Avenue, Suite 5, Fairbanks, AK 99701, USA
Janice Wiegers
Affiliation:
AGRA Earth and Environmental Inc, 3504 Industrial Avenue, Suite 5, Fairbanks, AK 99701, USA
Ed Meggert
Affiliation:
State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 610 University Avenue, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA
Nick Glover
Affiliation:
Alaska Clean Seas, P.O. Box 340022, Prudoe Bay, AK 99734, USA

Abstract

Oil exploration and production in the Arctic regions has resulted in spills of petroleum and salt water in tundra ecosystems. The transportation and use of refined petroleum in Arctic regions has also led to spills, and the cleanup and ecosystem restoration in these systems can often be complicated by the existence of ice-rich soil permafrost. Compaction, removal, or tearing of the protective vegetation and organic soil can result in thermokarsting and associated changes in plant communities, which may persist for decades. Such problems led the State of Alaska to establish recovery-based clean-up regulations for spills to tundra.

A review was conducted of published literature, government agency spill files, and industry reports concerning spills of petroleum and saline water in tundra regions. A tundra spill database was created, which allows the determination of the spill frequency of refined petroleum, crude oil, and saline water. Refined-petroleum spills are more common and smaller than crude-oil and saline-water spills. Most spills are to wet tundra during winter, and winter spills are more effectively cleaned up than those in summer. In winter, snow contains most spills, frozen soil and frozen water bodies prevent much soil penetration, plants are dormant, and operation of heavy equipment is feasible on frozen ground. The use of fire to reduce the volume of petroleum spills in winter is not recommended. Heat from burning petroleum can melt snow, thaw soil, and allow the penetration of petroleum into soil.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carter, T.C., and Jorgenson, M.T.. 1994. Long-term ecological monitoring of tundra affected by a crude oil spill near drill site 2U, Kuparuk oilfield, Alaska. Annual report to ARCO Alaska Inc. Fairbanks: ABR Inc.Google Scholar
Filler, D.M. 2000. The need for a tundra treatment protocol. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Arctic Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) technical seminar. Ottawa: Environment Canada: 10651077.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, M.T., and Carter, T.C.. 1991. Land rehabilitation studies in the Kuparuk oilfield, Alaska. 1991 Annual report to ARCO Alaska Inc. Fairbanks: ABR Inc.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, M.T., and Carter, T.C.. 1996. Minimizing ecological damage during cleanup of terrestrial and wetland oil spills. In: Cheremisinoff, P.N. (editor). Storage tanks. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company (Advances in environmental control technology series): 257293.Google Scholar
McKendrick, J.D. 1999. Arctic tundra recovery from crude oil after 24 years, Prudhoe Bay. Agroborealis 1: 2835.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.W., Loynachan, T.E., and McKendrick, J.D.. 1979. Effects of tillage and fertilization on the persistence of crude oil contamination in an Alaskan soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 8: 525532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar