Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:54:06.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Sebastian Knecht
Sebastian Knecht*
Affiliation:
Berlin Graduate School for Transnational Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, Ihnestrasse 26, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This note studies the addendum to the Arctic Council (AC)'s 2013 Observer Manual adopted at the Senior Arctic Officials’ (SAO) meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, in October 2015. The amendment means another essential step to systematise further and improve the council's working relations with currently 32 entities that hold observer status in the forum. Compared to the initial manual that sketched out the role observers should play in the council's subsidiary bodies, the latest revisions delineate a framework for enhancing observer participation and commitment in working group, task force and expert group meetings. After reviewing the content and practical implications of the addendum in the context of larger reform efforts to adapt the council to the age of a global(ising) Arctic, the article further discusses a number of signals the Anchorage decision sends to observers. These comprise the council's willingness and ability to quick, unified and purposeful action towards institutional adaptation and procedural reform as considered necessary to address organisational deficiencies, strengthened top-down steering of the reform processes by SAOs as related to the work conducted in subsidiary bodies and the overall functioning of the council, and higher expectations on observers to contribute to the AC system and deliver on the new provisions.

Type
Notes
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 5 , September 2016 , pp. 601 - 605
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arctic Council. 2013a. Arctic Council Rules of Procedure as revised by the Arctic Council at the 8th Arctic Council Ministerial meeting. Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/940 (accessed 3 March 2016).Google Scholar
Arctic Council. 2013b. Observer Manual for subsidiary bodies as adopted by the Arctic Council at the 8th Arctic Council Ministerial meeting. Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat.Google Scholar
Council, Arctic. 2015. Observer Manual for Subsidiary Bodies as adopted by the Arctic Council at the 8th Arctic Council Ministerial meeting, Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013, and addendum approved by the Senior Arctic Officials at the meeting of the Senior Arctic Officials. Anchorage, United States of America, 20–22 October 2015. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/939 (accessed 3 March 2016).Google Scholar
Fenge, T. and Funston, B.. 2015. The practice and promise of the Arctic Council. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
Graczyk, P. and Koivurova, T.. 2014. A new era in the Arctic Council's external relations? Broader consequences of the Nuuk observer rules for Arctic governance. Polar Record 50 (3): 225–236.Google Scholar
Hasanat, W. 2013. Reforming the Arctic Council against increasingly climate change challenges in the north. Michigan State International Law Review 22 (1): 195–240.Google Scholar
Nord, D.C. 2016. The Arctic Council: governance within the far north. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramos, B.S. 2013. Strengthening the capacity of the Arctic Council: is the permanent secretariat a first step? In: Heininen, L. (editor). Arctic Yearbook 2013. Akureyri: Northern Research Forum: 264–278.Google Scholar
SAO (Senior Arctic Officials). 2015a. Special session on observer engagement, final agenda. Arctic Council SAO plenary meeting. Anchorage, Alaska, 21–22 October 2015. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1484 (accessed 3 March 2016).Google Scholar
SAO (Senior Arctic Officials). 2015b. Summary report of the SAO plenary meeting. Anchorage, Alaska, 21–22 October 2015. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1576 (accessed 3 March 2016).Google Scholar
Steinberg, P.E. and Dodds, K.. 2015. The Arctic Council after Kiruna. Polar Record 51 (1): 108–110.Google Scholar
United States. 2015. U.S. chairmanship program highlights brochure. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/943 (accessed 3 March 2016).Google Scholar
Young, O.R. forthcoming. The Arctic Council at twenty: how to remain effective in a rapidly changing environment. UC Irvine Law Review.Google Scholar