Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:16:26.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of the Antarctic wilderness: views from emerging adults in Spain and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2016

John Peden ,
Tina Tin ,
Luis R. Pertierra ,
Pablo Tejedo  and
Javier Benayas
John Peden
Affiliation:
School of Human Ecology, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8034, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA ([email protected])
Tina Tin
Affiliation:
85 Rue du St Michel, 73190 Challes les Eaux, France
Luis R. Pertierra
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES-28049, Madrid, Spain
Pablo Tejedo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES-28049, Madrid, Spain
Javier Benayas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES-28049, Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The preambles of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty and the 1991 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic state that Antarctica is to be managed in the interest of all mankind. However, key phrases such as ‘interest of all mankind’ and ‘wilderness and aesthetic values’ are subject to interpretation. The objective of this study is to gain a better understanding of public perceptions of the Antarctic wilderness, proceeding from the assumption that public views should be incorporated into the consultative parties’ decision making process. The study expands on previous research by exploring whether perceptions of the Antarctic environment varied between students at two comparably sized public universities in Spain and the United States. Four hundred undergraduate students were asked about their values, beliefs and attitudes with respect to environmental management practices in Antarctica. After controlling for course type, responses showed little variation based on nationality. A large proportion of students valued Antarctica as a science laboratory for the benefit of mankind, as one of the world's last great wildernesses, and an important component of the climate system. Students did not support an increase in the number of people going to Antarctica, and favoured limitations on infrastructure development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 5 , September 2016 , pp. 541 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, S.D., Wickwar, D.A., Clark, F.P. and others. 2009. Values, beliefs, and attitudes technical guide for Forest Service land and resource management, planning, and decision-making. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-788).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J.J. 2004. Emerging adulthood: the winding road from late teens through the twenties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnett, J.J. 2011. Emerging adulthood(s): The cultural psychology of a new life stage. In: Jensen, L.A. (editor). Bridging cultural and developmental psychology: new syntheses in theory, research, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press: 255–275.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S. and Stroink, M.L.. 2011. Variation in environmentalism among university students: majoring in outdoor recreation, parks and tourism predicts environmental concerns and behaviours. The Journal of Environmental Education 42 (3): 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASOC (Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition). 2011. Land-based tourism in Antarctica. Buenos Aires: Antarctic Treaty Secretariat (ATCM 34: Buenos Aires 20 June–1 July 2011. Information paper 87).Google Scholar
Barnes, J.N. and Webb, C.W.. 1996. Implementing the Protocol, state practice, and the role of Non-Governmental Organisations. In: Francioni, F. and Scovazzi, T. (editors). International Law for Antarctica. (2nd Edn). The Hague: Kluwer Law International: 475–503.Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, K. 2009. Protecting polar wilderness: just a western philosophical idea or a useful concept for regulating human activities in the polar regions? In: Alfredsson, G., Koivurova, T. (editors-in-chief), and Leary, D. (special editor). The yearbook of polar law. 1. Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff: 73–99.Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, K. 2003. The Antarctic environmental protocol and its domestic legal implementation. Leiden: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, K., and van Hengel, S.. 2009. The role of the protected area concept in protecting the world's largest natural reserve: Antarctica. Utrecht Law Review 5 (1): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastmeijer, K. and Tin, T.. 2015. Antarctica – A wilderness continent for science: the ‘public's dream’ as a mission impossible? In: Alfredsson, G., Koivurova, T. (editors-in-chief), and Ágústsson, H.Ó. (special editor). The yearbook of polar law. 6. Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff: 559–597.Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, K., Lamers, M., and Harcha, J., 2008. Permanent land–based facilities for tourism in Antarctica: the need for regulation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 17 (1): 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeve–de Pauw, J. and Van Petegem, P.. 2010. A cross–national perspective on youth environmental attitudes. The Environmentalist 30 (2): 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhl, H.M. and Lanz, M.. 2007. Emerging adulthood in Europe: common traits and variability across five European countries. Journal of Adolescent Research 22 (5): 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J.B. and Nelson, M.P.. 1998. The great new wilderness debate. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Brunton, Colmar. 2011. Public opinion of Antarctica. Christchurch: Antarctica New Zealand. URL: www.parliament.nz/resource/mi-nz/50SCFDT_EVI_00DBSCH_FIN_10919_1_A227504/e94263e14ce8f546f8ffe2fd342912562df4979b (accessed 1 October 2015.Google Scholar
COMNAP (Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs). 2014. Main Antarctic facilities operated by National Antarctic Programmes in the Antarctic Treaty Area (south of 60° latitude south). Updated 13 February 2014. Christchurch New Zealand: CONMAP Secretariat. URL: https://www.comnap.aq/Information/SiteAssets/SitePages/Home/Antarctic_Facilities_List_13Feb2014.xls (accessed 1 October 2015.Google Scholar
Cordano, M., Welcomer, S., Scherer, R.F. and others. 2010. A cross–cultural assessment of three theories of pro–environmental behavior: a comparison between business students of Chile and the United States. Environment and Behavior 43 (5): 634–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordell, H.K., Bergstrom, J.C., and Bowker, J.M.. 2005. The multiple values of wilderness. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
Del Acebo Ibáñez, E. and Costa, M.. 2010. Antarctic environmental problems: attitudes and behaviours of young inhabitants of two Argentine cities (Buenos Aires and San Carlos de Bariloche). Polar Record 46 (3): 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, C.B. 2007. From duty to desire: emerging adulthood in Europe and its consequences. Child Development Perspectives 1 (2): 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudeney, J.R. and Walton, D.W.H.. 2012. Leadership in politics and science within the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Research 31: 11075, doi: 10.3402/polar.v31i0.11075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbertz, S., Liggett, D., and Steel, G.. 2013. Value theory for an Antarctic case study. In: Liggett, D. and Hemmings, A.D. (editors). Exploring Antarctic values. Christchurch: University of Canterbury(Gateway Antarctica special publication series1301): 10–21.Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2009. Resolution of 3 February 2009 on Wilderness in Europe (2008/2210(INI)) P6_TA(2009)0034. Strasbourg: European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2009-0034+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 1 October 2015.Google Scholar
Franzen, A. and Meyer, R.. 2010. Environmental attitudes in cross–national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review 26 (2): 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, R., and Nilsson, A.. 2014. Personal and social factors that influence pro–environmental concern and behaviour: a review. International Journal of Psychology 49 (3): 141–157.Google ScholarPubMed
Hodgkinson, S.P. and Innes, J.M.. 2001. The attitudinal influence of career orientation in 1st–year university students: environmental attitudes as a function of degree choice. The Journal of Environmental Education 32 (3): 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K.A., Fretwell, P., Rae, J and others. 2011. Untouched Antarctica: mapping a finite and diminishing environmental resource. Antarctic Science 23 (6): 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, S. J. 2004. The effects of an environmental education program on responsible environmental behaviour and associated environmental literacy variables in Taiwanese college students. The Journal of Environmental Education 35 (2): 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). 2009. Land–based tourism facilities. Baltimore: ATCP (32nd ATCM 6–17 April 2009: Information paper 101).Google Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). 2014. 2013–2014 Summary of seaborne, airborne, and land–based Antarctic tourism (Version 10 May 2014). Newport, RI: IATTO. URL: http://iaato.org/tourism-statistics (accessed 1 October 2015).Google Scholar
Izagirre–Olaizola, J., Fernández–Sainz, A. and Vicente–Molina, M.A.. 2015. Internal determinants of recycling behaviour by university students: a cross–country comparative analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39 (1): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabour, J. 2013. The utility of official Antarctic inspections: symbolism without sanction? In: Liggett, D. and Hemmings, A.D. (editors). Exploring Antarctic values. Christchurch: University of Canterbury (Gateway Antarctica special publication series 1301): 90–106.Google Scholar
Kormos, C.F. (editor). 2008. A handbook on international wilderness law and policy. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
Kuo, S.Y. and Jackson, N.L.. 2014. Influence of an environmental studies course on attitudes of undergraduates at an engineering university. The Journal of Environmental Education 45 (2): 91–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K. B. 2011. The relationship between academic major and environmentalism among college students: is it mediated by the effects of gender, political ideology and financial security? The Journal of Environmental Education 42 (4): 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J.H. and Sibley, C.G.. 2012. Hope for the future? Understanding self–sacrifice in the face of global warming among young citizens of the world in the face of global warming. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 12 (1): 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaper, R., and Childerhouse, S.. 2014. Present and future conservation management of Antarctic baleen whales. In: Tin, T., Liggett, D., Maher, P. and Lamers, M.. (editors). Antarctic futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environment. Dordrecht: Springer–Verlag: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGonigal, D. and Woodworth, L.. 2003. Antarctica: the complete story. London: Frances Lincoln.Google Scholar
Milfont, T.L. 2012. Cultural differences in environmental engagement. In: Clayton, S. (editor), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. Oxford: OUP: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milfont, T.L. and Schultz, P.W.. 2016. Culture and the natural environment. Current Opinion in Psychology 8: 194–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, R.F. 2001. Wilderness and the American mind. 4th Edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. 2010. Rethinking global biodiversity strategies: exploring structural changes in production and consumption reduce biodiversity loss. The Hague/Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL).Google Scholar
Neufeld, E., O'Reilly, J., Summerson, R., and Tin, T.. 2014. Valuing Antarctica: emerging views from international studies. In: Tin, T., Liggett, D., Maher, P. and Lamers, M.. (editors). Antarctic futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environment. Dordrecht: Springer–Verlag: 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government, New Zealand. 2010. New Zealand Antarctic and Southern Ocean science: directions and priorities 2010–2020. Wellington: New Zealand Government. URL: http://antarcticanz.govt.nz/science/strategy (accessed 1 October 2015).Google Scholar
Parks, S.D. 2011. Big questions, worthy dreams: mentoring emerging adults in their search for meaning, purpose, and faith. 2nd Edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Peden, J., Tin, T., Benayas, J. and others. 2015. Public values of the Antarctic wilderness: a comparison of university students in Spain and United States. In: Watson, A., Carver, S., Krenova, Z., and McBride, B. (compilers). Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (10th World Wilderness Congress symposium 4–10, October 2013, Salamanca, Spain. Proceedings RMRS–P–74): 122–126.Google Scholar
Pisano, I. and Lubell, M.. 2015. Environmental behaviour in cross–national perspective: a multilevel analysis of 30 countries. Environment and Behavior doi: 10.1177/0013916515600494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, R. 2007. Changing human relationships with wilderness and wildlands: implications for managers. International Journal of Wilderness 13 (3): 4–6,11.Google Scholar
Press, A.J. 2014. 20 year Australian Antarctic strategic plan. URL: http://20yearplan.antarctica.gov.au/home. Accessed 1 October 2015.Google Scholar
Rideout, B.E. 2005. The effect of a brief environmental problems module on endorsement of the new ecological paradigm in college students. The Journal of Environmental Education 37 (1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roura, R.M. 2007. Greenpeace. In: Riffenburgh, B. (editor). The encyclopedia of the Antarctic. Vol 1. New York: Routledge: 472–474.Google Scholar
Sæþórsdóttir, A.D. and Saarinen, J.. 2016. Challenges due to changing ideas of natural resources: tourism and power plant development in the Icelandic wilderness. Polar Record 52 (1): 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, J.F. 2013. Perceptions and opinions of Antarctic values in Chile. In: Liggett, D. and Hemmings, A.D. (editors). Exploring Antarctic values. Christchurch: University of Canterbury (Gateway Antarctica special publication series 1301): 48–69.Google Scholar
Sanderson, E.W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M.A. and others. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52 (10): 891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, J., Simpson, S. and Abdulaziz, E.. 2011. The environmental action and philosophy matrix: an exploratory study of the environmental attitudes of recreation management and environmental studies students. Journal of Environmental Education 42 (2): 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabudin, A.F.A., Rahim, R.A., Nor, N.M. and other. 2016. Antarctic values and Malaysia's involvement in Antarctica: perceptions among young citizens of Malaysia. Polar Record 52 (3): 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J.D., Terauds, A., Riddle, M.J. and others. 2014. Antarctica's protected areas are inadequate, unrepresentative, and at risk. PLoS Biology 12 (6), e1001888. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C., Christofferson, K., Davison, H., and other. 2011. Lost in transition: the dark side of emerging adulthood. New York: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerson, R.M.V. 2013. The protection of wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning.Google Scholar
Terauds, A., Chown, S.L., Morgan, F and others. 2012. Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic. Diversity and Distributions 18 (7): 726–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thapa, B. 2001. Environmental concern: a comparative analysis between students in recreation and park management and other departments. Environmental Education Research 7 (1): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tikka, P., Kuitunen, M., and Tynys, S.. 2000. Effects of educational background on students’ attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. Journal of Environmental Education 31: 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tin, T. 2013. Environmental advocacy in the Antarctic Treaty System – a personal view from the 2000s. The Polar Journal 3 (2): 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tin, T., and Summerson, R.. 2013. Growing human footprint, diminishing wilderness in Antarctica. International Journal of Wilderness 19 (3): 10–13, 36.Google Scholar
Tin, T., Bastmeijer, K., O'Reilly, J., and other. 2011. Public perception of the Antarctic wilderness: surveys from an educated, environmentally knowledgeable European community. In: Watson, A., Murrieta–Saldivar, J., and McBride, B., comps. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (9th World Wilderness Congress symposium 6–13 November 2009. Merida: Mexico. Proceedings RMRS–P–64): 109–117.Google Scholar
Vicente–Molina, M. A., Fernández–Sáinz, A., A. and Izagirre –Olaizola, J.. 2013. Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro–environmental behaviour: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 61: 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, A.E. 2013. The role of wilderness protection and societal engagement as indicators of well–being: an examination of change at the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Social Indicators Research 110 (2): 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yencken, D., Fien, J. and Sykes, H.. 2000. Environment, education and society in the Asia–Pacific: local traditions and global discourses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zinn, H.C. and Graefe, A.R.. 2007. Emerging adults and the future of wild nature. International Journal of Wilderness 13 (3): 16–22.Google Scholar