Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:53:17.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The legal status of the Northern Sea Route

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Leonid Timtchenko
Affiliation:
ul. Gv. Shironintsev-40, kv. 184, 310 123 Kharkov, Ukraine

Abstract

For a long period the Northern Sea Route was considered by the Soviet Union as a national seaway closed to foreign shipping. In 1987 Mikhail Gorbachev announced his intention to open the Northern Sea Route for international navigation. In the following years a number of acts were adopted to realise this idea. These documents clarified to a great extent the attitude of the USSR to the sector concept, historic waters, and other aspects of the northern seas. Nevertheless, some uncertainties in the legal status of the Northern Sea Route remain. This article focuses on the doctrinal views, state practice of the USSR and Russia, and prospects of internationalisation of the Northern Sea Route on the basis of international convention.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1992. United States Responsesto Excessive National Maritime Claims. Limits in the Seas 112: 53, 8485.Google Scholar
Armstrong, T. 1952. The Northern Sea Route: Soviet exploitation of the North East Passage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boitsov, F., Ivanov, G., and Makovskiy, A.. 1976. Morskoye pravo [ The law of the sea]. Moscow.Google Scholar
Bolshaya Sovetskaya Entsiclopediya. 1976. Moscow: vol. 23.Google Scholar
Brubaker, D. 1992. International law and Russian Arctic waters. International Challenges 12 (1): 97107.Google Scholar
Butler, W. 1972. Soviet maritime jurisdiction in the Arctic. Polar Records (102): 418421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, W. 1978. Northeast Arctic passage. Aphen aan Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, W. 1983a. Basic documents on the Soviet legal system. New York: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Butler, W. 1983b. The USSR, eastern Europe and the development of the law of the sea. London: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Elferink, A. 1991. The 1990 USSR-USA Maritime Boundary Agreement. International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law 6: 4152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckx, E. 1990. Innocent passage of warships: recent developments in US-Soviet relations. Marine Policy 14: 484490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckx, E. 1991a. New developments in the North-east Passage. InternationalJournal of Estuarine and Coastal Law 6 1: 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckx, E. 1991b. Marine scientific research and the Soviet Arctic. Polar Record 27 (163): 325337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckx, E. 1992. Nature protection in the Arctic: recent Soviet legislation. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 41 (2): 366386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granberg, A. 1992. The Northern Sea Route and the policy of new Russia. International Challenges 12 (1): 514.Google Scholar
International Challenges. 1992. Regulations for navigation on the seaways of the Northern Sea Route. International Challenges 12 (1): 121126.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice. 1951. Reports of judgements, advisory opinions and orders. Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
International Legal Materials. 1970. Vol. 9: 543552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Legal Materials. 1985. Vol. 24: 17151721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, Yu., and Ushakov, A.. 1992. The Northern Sea Route now open. International Challenges 12 (1): 1520.Google Scholar
Izvescheniya Moreplavatelyam. 1983. No. 34.Google Scholar
Izvescheniya Moreplavatelyam. 1986. No.1 (Annex).Google Scholar
Izvescheniya Moreplavatelyam. 1991. No. 29.Google Scholar
Klimenko, B. 1990. Morskaya granitsa mezhdu SSSR i SShA [The marine boundary between the USSR and the USA]. International Affairs 9: 149153.Google Scholar
Kolodkin, A., and Volosov, M.. 1990. The legal regime of the Soviet Arctic: major issues. Marine Policy 14 (2): 158168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korovin, E. 1926. SSSR i polyarnye zemli [The USSR and polar lands]. Sovetskoe Pravo 3: 4346.Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, F. (editor). 1961. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International law]. Moscow.Google Scholar
Lakhtin, V.L. 1928. Prava na sevemyye polyarnyye prostranstva [Rights over the polar regions]. Moscow: Izdaniye Litizdata Narodnogo Komissariata po Inostrannym Delam.Google Scholar
Martens, F. 1905. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo tsivilizovannykh narodov [Contemporary international law of civilized nations]. St Peterburg.Google Scholar
Meshera, V. 1978. The legal status of maritime areas. Moscow.Google Scholar
Odnopozov, P. 1973. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoi rezhim arkticheskikh morskikh prostranstv [The international legal regime of Arctic oceans]. PravovedenieA: 4 7882.Google Scholar
Ostreng, W. 1991. The Northern Sea Route: a new era in Soviet policy? Ocean Development and International Law 22: 259287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharand, D. 1988. Canada's Arctic waters in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roginko, A., and La Mourie, M.. 1992. Emerging marine environmental protection strategies for the Arctic. Marine Policy 16 (4): 259276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozakis, Ch. L., and Stagos, P. N.. 1987. The Turkish straits. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Sigrist, S. 1928. Sovetskoe pravo v polyarnykh prostranstvakh [Soviet law in polar spaces]. Rabochiy sud 13: 982987.Google Scholar
Sobraniye Postanovleniy Pravitel'stva SSSR. 1971. No. 17: 124.Google Scholar
Sobraniye Postanovleniy Pravitel'stva SSSR. 1990. No. 16: 87.Google Scholar
Sobraniye Zakonov SSSR. 1926. No. 32: 203.Google Scholar
Taagholt, J. 1992. International law of the sea- in an Arctic perspective. In: L, Lyck (editor). Nordic Arctic research on contemporary Arctic problems: proceedings from Nordic Arctic Research Symposium. Copenhagen: Nordic Arctic Research Forum: 93104.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1964. Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone of 1958. New York: UN Treaty Series 7477.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1982. Convention on the Law of the Sea. A/Conf.62/122.Google Scholar
Ushakov, N. (editor). 1990. Osnovnye instituty mezhdunarodnogo prava[Themain institutes ofinternationallaw]. Moscow (Vol.3 of/ mezhdunarodnogo prava v semi tomach [Course of international law in seven volumes).Google Scholar
Uustal, A. 1958. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoi rezhim territorialnykh vod[lntemational legal regime of territorial waters). Tartu.Google Scholar
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. 1960. No. 34: 324.Google Scholar
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. 1982. No. 48: 891.Google Scholar
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. 1984a. No.9: 137.Google Scholar
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. 1984b. No.48: 863.Google Scholar
Vereschetin, V. (editor). 1992. Otrasly mezhdunarodnogo prava[Branchesofinternational law]. Moscow (Vol.5 of Kurs mezhdunarodnogo pra va v semi tomach [ Course of international law in seven volumes).Google Scholar
The accuracy of references in the text and in this list is the responsibility of the author, to whom queries should be addressed.Google Scholar