Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:00:01.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law for special environments: jurisdiction over polar activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Daniel Wilkes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The T-3 ice island case involved two trials in the United States of a Mexican-American, Mario Escamilla, for allegedly causing the death of a Negro coworker, Bennie Lightsey, on an ice island then at lat 84°45.8'N, long 106°24.4'W, on the High Seas, about 240 km north of Ellesmere Island on 16 July 1970. A federal judge in Virginia allowed Escamilla's first trail to proceed without definitively deciding on objections to jurisdiction, for he expected a ruling on this point on appeal. Issues raised by that trial are covered elsewhere (Pharand, 1971; Wilkes, 1972).

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 16 , Issue 104 , May 1973 , pp. 701 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, T.Notes on a conference on the Arctic Ocean at Ditchley Park, Oxfordshire, 1971. Polar Record, Vol 16, No 100, p 76–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchard, H. 1972. Slaying in Arctic retried. Washington Post, 2 November, p B2.Google Scholar
Federal Reporter. 1972. United States of America, Appellee, Escamilla, v. Mario Jaimes, Appellant, No. 71–1575. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued June 7, 1972. Decided Aug. 17, 1972. Vol 467, 2d series, p 341–49 (Cited as 467 F.2d 341 (1972).).Google Scholar
Klein, F. J. and Wilkes, D. 1965. Optional protocol for trial by an international criminal court for offences on polar ice. In: Mueller, G. O. W. and Wise, E. M.International criminal law. South Hackensack, NJ, Fred B. Rothman and Co, p 582–85.Google Scholar
Pharand, D. 1971. State jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3: the Escamilla case. Arctic, Vol 24, No 2, p 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B.The Arctic Ocean. Report of a conference at Ditchley Park, 14–17 May, 1971. Ditchley Park, The Ditchley Foundation, 1971. 49 p (Ditchley Paper No 37).Google Scholar
Wilkes, D. 1971. International administrative due process and control of pollution—the Canadian Arctic waters example. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol 2, No 3, p 499–539.Google Scholar
Wilkes, D. 1972. Law for special environments: ice islands and questions raised by the T-3 case. Polar Record, Vol 16, No 100, p 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar