Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:07:01.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human security, the Arctic Council and climate change: competition or co-existence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2013

Heather N. Nicol  and
Lassi Heininen
Heather N. Nicol
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K91 7B8, Canada ([email protected])
Lassi Heininen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, FIN-96101, Rovaniemi, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that the current understanding of the Arctic as a region fraught by increasing tension and competition under conditions of climate change is an incomplete story. It ignores many salient developments in furthering co-operation and human security agendas, and marginalises some of the more complex and interesting developments within the region. Such changes in ‘natural states’ do not, in and of themselves, create geopolitical and political instability. Rather, it is the way in which change is understood as a problem for institutional and international organs that creates conditions for co-operation or competition. In the Arctic today, the balance is tipped in favour of co-operation, but the situation is complex and many actors have vested interests.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 80 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althingi. 2011. A parliamentary resolution on Iceland's Arctic policy. 28 March 2011. Reykjavik: Althing (139th legislative session).Google Scholar
Borgerson, S.G. 2008. Arctic meltdown: the economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs 30 (2): 63.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2008. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – The European Union and the Arctic Region. Brussels: European Commission (20 November 2008 COM (2008) 763 final).Google Scholar
EUROPA press release. 2008. The Arctic merits the European Union's attention – first step towards an EU Arctic policy, 20 November 2008. URL: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1750&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=enGoogle Scholar
Helander-Renvall, E. 2010. Globalization and traditional livelihoods. In: Heininen, L., and Southcott, C.. Globalization and the circumpolar north. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press: 179–219.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2004. Circumpolar International Relations and Geopolitics. In: AHDR (Arctic Human Development Report) 2004. Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute: 207–225.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2010. Globalization and security in the circumpolar north. In: Heininen, L., and Southcott, C.. Globalization and the circumpolar north. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press: 221–264.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2011. Arctic strategies and policies: inventory and comparative study. Rovaniemi: The Northern Research Forum and The University of Lapland. University of Lapland Press/Akureyri: Stell.Google Scholar
Heininen, L., and Nicol, H.N.. 2007. A new northern security agenda. In: Brunet-Jailly, E. Borderlands. Comparing border security in North America and Europe. Ottawa: University of Ottawa press: 117–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heininen, L., and Numminen, L.. 2011. Suomi arktisena maana ja Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltiona: miten Arktista neuvostoa vahvistetaan. In: Arcticfinland 13 March 201. URL: www.arcticfinland.fi (accessed 28 September 2012).Google Scholar
Huebert, R. 2010. The newly emerging Arctic security environment. March 2010. Calgary: Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute. URL: www.cdfai.org (accessed 16 September 2012).Google Scholar
ICC (Inuit Circumpolar Council). 2009. A circumpolar Inuit declaration on sovereignty in the Arctic. Adopted by the Inuit Circumpolar Council, April 2009. URL: inuitcircumpolar.com/files/. . ./icc-files/declaration12×18vicechairssigned.pdf (accessed 12 September 2012).Google Scholar
IPY (International Polar Year). 2007–2008. News, information bulletin, September 2007. The International Polar Year 2007/08 in the Russian Federation and around the World. 7: 2–12.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T. 2010. Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record 46 (237): 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrov, S. 2009. Outline of the statement by Sergey V. Lavrov at the session of the Arctic Council, 29 April 2009, Tromso: Arctic Council. URL: www.mid.ru/. . ./2ece32e010571aa7c32575a8002df0cf!OpenDocument (accessed 12 September 2012).Google Scholar
Norway. 2009. The Norwegian Government's high north strategy. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. URL: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2009. URL: http://www.norway.org/aboutnorway/government-and-policy/The-High-North/strategy/ (accessed 28 September 2012).Google Scholar
Paci, J., Dickson, C., Nikels, S., Chan, L. and Furgal, C.. 2004. Food security of northern indigenous peoples in a time of uncertainly. Yellowknife: Northern Research Forum (Position paper for the 3rd NRF open meeting, Yellowknife, 15–18 September 2004) URL: www.nrf.is/. . ./3rd%20NRF_Plenary%204_PP_Paci%20et%20al.pdf 04 (accessed 12 September 2012).Google Scholar
Struck, D. 2007. Russia's deep-sea flag-planting at North Pole strikes a chill in Canada, 7 August 2007. Washington: Washington Post Foreign Service. URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/06/AR2007080601369.html (accessed 12 September 2012).Google Scholar
United States. 2009. National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive. President George W. Bush, The White House. URL: http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-66.htm (accessed 12 September 2012).Google Scholar
USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2008. 90 billion barrels of oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of natural gas assessed in the Arctic, 23 July 2008. URL: http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1980&from=rss_home. (accessed 18 May 2012).Google Scholar