Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:28:43.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Focussing an Antarctic research programme: the Australian experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Bruce W. Davis
Affiliation:
Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Abstract

This paper illustrates the manner in which inceased political and community interest in Antarctica is shifting the focus of Australian Antarctic research towards environmental management, creating tensions amongst bureaucrats and scientists as to programme priorities and funding allocations, and argues the existence of three distinct eras, each with particular chacteristics and orientation, but all reflecting political and scientific perspectives about Antarctic at the relevant time: (a) idosyncratic individualism in the ‘heroic age’ of Antarctic exploration 1890–1945; (b) hydra-headed science programmes within the Antarctic Treaty system 1945–1959–1990; and (c) prospective maturity management of the Antarctic environment in the post-CRAMRA era, 1990 onwards.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Science and Technology Council. 1990. Environmental research in Australia: the issues. Canberra, ASTEC.Google Scholar
Australian Science and Technology Council. 1991. Initial outline for issues and options paper, Setting research directions for Australia's future. Canberra, ASTEC.Google Scholar
Bahm, A. 1971. Science is not value-free. Policy Sciences, 1: 391–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. Lets save Antarctica. Richmond, Greenhouse Publications.Google Scholar
Bechervaise, J. 1961. Thefarsouth. Sydney, Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Beck, P. 1986. The international politics of Antarctica. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Beck, P. 1990. Antarctica as a zone of peace: a strategic irrejevance? In: Herr, R., Hall, R. and Haward, M. (editors). Antarctica's future: continuity or change? Hobart, Australian Institute of International Affairs: 193–224.Google Scholar
Beck, P. 1990. Antarctica enters the 1990s: an overview. Applied Geography 10 (4): 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergin, A. 1990. Australia and the politics of CRAMRA. Paper presented at National Conference, Australasian Political Science Association, Hobart, September 1990.Google Scholar
Beneviste, G. 1973. The politics of expertise. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bush, W. 1990. The Antarctic Treaty System: towards a comprehensive environmental regime. In Herr, R., Hall, R. and Haward, M. (editors.). Antarctica's future: continuiity or change? Hobart, Australian Institute of International Relations: 119–80.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. 1975. Towards new perspectives in Australian scientific research in Antarctica. Canberra, ACAP.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. 1989a. Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Joint statement by Minister for Primary Industries and Minister for Resources, Research innnovation and competitiveness. Canberra, May 1989.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. 1989b. Joint statement by the Prime Minister and Minister for Science: Science and technology for Australia. Canberra, May 1989.Google Scholar
Cross, M.. 1991. Antarctica: exploration or exploitation? New Scientist 22 June: 2528.Google Scholar
Cullen, P. 1990. Values and science in environmental management. Paper presented at Symposium on Water Management in the Alligator Rivers Region, Canberra, April 1990.Google Scholar
Cumpston, J.. 1968. Macquarie Island. ANAREScience Reports, Series 4 (1).Google Scholar
Davis, B. W. Science and politics in Antarctic and Southern Oceans policy: a critical assessment. In Herr, R., Hall, R., Haward, M. (editors). Antarctica's future:continuity orchange? Hobart, Australian Institute of International Affairs, Hobart: 3946.Google Scholar
Davis, B. W. 1991. Rhetoric and reality in policy process: Antarcticaasaglobalprotectedarea. Paper presented at National Conference, Australasian Political Studies Association, Griffith University, July 1991.Google Scholar
Elzinga, A. and Bohlin, I. 1989. The politics of science in polar regions. Ambio 18 (1): 7176.Google Scholar
Hamzah, B., (editor). 1987. Antarctica in international affairs. Malaysia, Institute of Strategic and International StudiesGoogle Scholar
Harris, S. 1990. The influence of the United Nations on the Antarctic System: a source of erosion or cohesion? Working Paper 10/1990, Department of International Relations, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Herber, B. 1991 in press. The common heritage principle: Antarctica andthe developing nations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, J. 1983. Cooperation in the Antarctic: a quarter of a century's experience. In Vicuna, O. F. (editor). Antarctic resources policy: scientific, legal and policy issues. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 103–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, L. 1990. Southern exposure: deciding Antarctica's future. Washington, World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Kriwoken, L. and Keage, P. 1987. Antarctic environmental politics: protected areas. Paper presented at Ecopolitics Conference, University of Tasmania, May 1987.Google Scholar
Law, P. 1983. Antarcticodyssey. Melbourne, HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Laws, R. 1991. Unacceptable threats to Antarctic Science. New Scientist 30 March.Google Scholar
Lopez, B. 1990. The cold clear view from the South Pole. Dialogue 1: 2632.Google Scholar
Lowe, I. 1991. The politics of long-term issues. Paper presented at National Conference, Australasian Political Studies Association, Griffith University, August 1991.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1991 in press. Organisation and funding of the Australian Antarctic Program. Hobart, IASOS, University of Tasmania, 1991.Google Scholar
Meynaud, J. 1964. Technocracy, new York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, J.G. 1986. Antarctica: our last great wilderness. Melbourne, Australian Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
Mountfield, D. 1974. A history of Antarctic exploration. London, Hamlyn.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. 1980. Antarctica: the last great land rush on earth. International Organisation 34 (3): 377403.Google Scholar
Polar Research Board (USA). 1986. Antarctic Treaty System: an assessment. In: Proceedings of a workshop, Beardmore Field Camp, Antarctica, January 1985, Washington, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Quilty, P. 1990. Antarctica as a continent for science. In Herr, R., Hall, R. and Haward, M. (editors). Antarctica's future: continuity or change? Hobart, Australian Institute of International Affairs: 2938.Google Scholar
Roots, E. F. 1986. The role of science in the Antarctic Treaty System. In Antarctic Treaty System: an assessment. Washington, National Academy Press: 169–84.Google Scholar
Scholes, A. 1949. Fourteen men: story of the Australian Antarctic Expedition to Heard Island. Melbourne, Cheshire.Google Scholar
Slatyer, R. 1991. Improving the dialogue between science and government. Address to Royal Australian Institute of Public Administration, Canberra.Google Scholar
Spenser, C. 1984. The evolution of Antarctic interests. In Harris, S. (editor). Australia's Antarctic policy options. Canberra, Centre for Ftesource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University (Monograph 11): 113–29.Google Scholar
Suter, K. 1991. Antarctica: private property or public heritage? Sydney, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Swan, T. 1961. Australia in the Antarctic. Melbourne, Melbourne University PressGoogle Scholar
Triggs, G. 1986. International law and Australian sovereignty in Antarctica. Sydney, Legal Books.Google Scholar
Vicuna, O. F. (editor). 1983. Antarctic resources policy: scientific, legal and political issues. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar