Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:00:06.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2017

Peter Morten
Peter Morten*
Affiliation:
Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New Zealand's Antarctic research began during the 1957/1958 International Geophysical Year. This analysis explains how and why it has evolved. There have been two phases: 1957 until 1991, when the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the universities were the key research organisations, and after 1991, when the publicly funded research sector became more diverse. International collaborations have been important throughout. Funding decision processes have progressed from a bottom-up curiosity-driven approach to a more complex system of regular contests. Since 1991, the focus has been on coherent strategies and the outcomes sought. Funding criteria are well-defined and contests are widely accepted as fair and transparent. Reviews and evaluations have been positive. Collaborative organisational interactions dominated decision-making during the early period. Bureaucratic politics is most evident in post-1991 organisational changes. The quality of the research strategies has improved in terms of defining outcomes sought and appropriate measures of progress towards them. However, New Zealand's Antarctic research funding is currently dispersed. It needs better coordination. Collaborative research should be emphasised in areas where New Zealand has established a strong reputation taking account of both national and global priorities if New Zealand's international research standing is to be maintained and enhanced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 382 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar
AntNZ (Antarctica New Zealand). (1998). New Zealand science in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean (1998–2003). Christchurch: Antarctica New Zealand.Google Scholar
AntNZ (Antarctica New Zealand). (2004). New Zealand science in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean (2004–2009). Christchurch: Antarctica New Zealand.Google Scholar
AntNZ (Antarctica New Zealand). (2005). Report of the review committee on New Zealand's Antarctic science. Christchurch: Antarctica New Zealand.Google Scholar
AntNZ (Antarctica New Zealand). (2013). Statement of Intent 2013–2016. Christchurch: Antarctica New Zealand.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. (2009). A history of Cenozoic glaciation – view from the margin. Developments in Earth and Environmental Science, 8, 33–83 Google Scholar
Brady, A.M. (Ed.). 2012. The emerging politics of Antarctica. Abbington: Routledge.Google Scholar
DSIR (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research). (1983). Antarctic achievements 1957–1982: New Zealand's role in the Antarctic. Wellington: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
DSIR (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research). (1988). Antarctic science – science activity review no. 1. Wellington: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
Dudeney, J. R., & Walton, D. W. H. (2012). Leadership in politics and science within the Antarctic treaty. Polar Research, 31, 11075.Google Scholar
Kennicutt, M. C., Chown, S. L., Cassano, J. J., Liggett, D., Massom, R., Peck, L. S., . . . Sutherland, W. J. (2014). Six priorities for Antarctic science. Nature, 512, 23–25.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517–526.Google Scholar
March, J. (1965). Handbook of organisations. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
MFAT (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade). (1996). Information bulletin 59. Wellington: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.Google Scholar
Morten, P. D. (2006). National benefit and its application to publicly funded research, science and technology investment. Wellington: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
New Zealand Government. (2011). Antarctic and Southern Ocean science directions 2010–2020. Wellington: New Zealand Government.Google Scholar
New Zealand Government. (2014). The Deep South national science challenge. Wellington: New Zealand Government. Retrieved from www.deepsouthchallenge.co.nz Google Scholar
Nossal, K. M. (1979). Allison through the Ottawa looking glass. Journal of the Canadian Public Administration, 22, 610–626.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. M. (1994). The reform of the public science system in New Zealand: a history of the background to and the implementation of the restructuring of the science system, 1988–1993. Wellington: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Peat, N. (2007). Antarctic partners: 50 years of New Zealand and United States cooperation in Antarctica 1957–2007. Wellington: Phantom House Books.Google Scholar
Quartermain, L. (1971). New Zealand and the Antarctic. Wellington: New Zealand Government.Google Scholar
RDRC (Ross Dependency Research Committee). (1959). Report to SCAR on New Zealand's IGY results. Wellington: Ross Dependency Research Committee.Google Scholar
RDRC (Ross Dependency Research Committee). (1959–1991). Annual reports attached for 32 years to the annual reports of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Wellington: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
RDRC (Ross Dependency Research Committee). (1985). Future directions in New Zealand Antarctic research. Wellington: Ross Dependency Research Committee.Google Scholar
RDRC (Ross Dependency Research Committee). (1993). 1993–98 Antarctic research plan. Wellington: Ross Dependency Research Committee.Google Scholar
Saunders, C., Guenther, M., & Dalziel, P. (2016). The contribution of Antarctic-related activities to the Canterbury and New Zealand economy. Lincoln: Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University.Google Scholar
STAC (Science and Technology Advisory Committee). (1987). The science and technology advisory committee report. Wellington: Science and Technology Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behaviour (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2006). Stern review: the economics of climate change. London: H.M. Treasury Google Scholar
Upton, S. (1990). National's policy on science, research and technology. New Zealand Engineering Journal, 45, 35–37.Google Scholar
Walton, D. W. H., Clarkson, P. D., & Summerhayes, C. P. (2011). Science in the snow: fifty years of international collaboration through the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research.Google Scholar