Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:23:19.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education and outreach by the Antarctic Treaty Parties, Observers and Experts under the framework of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings

Part of: Celebrating IPY Education, Outreach and Engagement – 10 years on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

José C. Xavier Open the ORCID record for José C. Xavier [Opens in a new window] ,
Dragomir Mateev ,
Linda Capper ,
Annick Wilmotte  and
David W. H. Walton
José C. Xavier*
Affiliation:
Marine and Environmental Research Centre (MARE), Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
Dragomir Mateev
Affiliation:
Bulgarian Antarctic Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria
Linda Capper
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
Annick Wilmotte
Affiliation:
InBios-Centre for Protein Engineering, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
David W. H. Walton
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
*
Author for correspondence: José C. Xavier, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of formal discourse about education and outreach within the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM), and the influence of major international activities in this field, are described. This study reflects on the ATCM Parties’ approach to implementing the ambition of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty Article 6.1.a, to promote the educational value of Antarctica and its environment, and examines the role of workshops and expert groups within the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes. These early initiatives, which emerged in the 1990s, were a prelude to the development and implementation of a large number of International Polar Year (IPY) education and outreach programmes. The establishment of an Antarctic Treaty System Intersessional Contact Group, and an online forum on education and outreach during the 2015 ATCM in Bulgaria, is a legacy of IPY and is the next step in fostering collaboration to engage people around the world in the importance and relevance of Antarctica to our daily lives.

Keywords

Antarctic Treaty SystemcommunicationeducationInternational Polar Yearoutreach
Type
Research Note
Information
Polar Record , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , July 2019 , pp. 241 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baeseman, J., Xavier, J. C., Lantuit, H., & Taylor, A. (2011). Early career researcher activities during the 4th International Polar Year. In Krupnik, I., Allison, I., Bell, R., Culer, P., Hik, D., Lopez-Martinez, J., Rachold, V., Sarukhanian, E., & Summerhayes, C. (Eds.), Understanding earth polar challenges: International Polar Year 2007–2008 (pp. 511–522). University of the Arctic, Rovaniemi, Finland: CCI Press.Google Scholar
Barber, L., Baeseman, J., Carlson, D., Edwards, K., Kaiser, B., Poort, L., …. Straka, T. (2010). Outreach: inspiring ideas and initiatives from around the world. In Kaiser, B., Zicus, S., & Allen, B. (Eds.), Polar science and global climate: An international resource for education & outreach (pp. 143–210). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Berkman, P. A., Lang, M. A., Walton, D. W. H., & Young, O. R. (2011). Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science, and the governance of international spaces. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, Belgium, Bulgaria, Portugal, & UK. (2014). Education and outreach activities associated with Antarctic Treaty consultative meetings (ATCM). Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_finalrep.aspx?lang=e&menu=2Google Scholar
Bulgaria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Portugal, & UK. (2015a). Co-chairs’ report of the Workshop on Education, Sofia, Bulgaria, May 2015 ATCM XXXVIII. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_finalrep.aspx?lang=e&menu=2Google Scholar
Bulgaria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Portugal, & UK. (2015b). Report on the ATCM XXXVIII workshop on Education and Outreach. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_finalrep.aspx?lang=e&menu=2Google Scholar
Capper, L. (2013). Making an impact: Communications, education and outreach. In Wratt, G. (Ed.), A story of Antarctic cooperation. 25 years of the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes (p. 105). Christchurch, New Zealand: COMNAP.Google Scholar
Capper, L., Dinar, A., & Allen, A. (2006). Discover Antarctica! Public engagement campaign: Evaluation report. Retrieved from https://www.bas.ac.uk/about/antarctica/the-antarctic-treaty/the-antarctic-treaty-explained/Google Scholar
Caramello, N. D. A., Ivar do Sul, J. A., Souza, J. S., Santos, E. A., Piuco, R. C., Affonso, S. F., … Costa, E. S. (2017). Ciência Polar e a Comunicação entre estudantes, educadores e cientistas. Revista Eletrônica Científica da UERGS, 3, 340–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingwall, P. R., & Walton, D. W. H. (Eds.). (1996). Opportunities for Antarctic environmental education and training. Gland, Switzerland, & Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Elzinga, A. (2016). Some reflections on the emergence of Antarctic humanities. In Roberts, P., van der Watt, L.-M., & Howkins, A. (Eds.), Antarctica and the humanities (pp. 273–302). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K. A., Liggett, D., Roldan, G., Wilmotte, A., & Xavier, J. C. (2016). Narrowing the science/policy gap for environmental management. Antarctic Science, 28, 325. doi: 10.1017/S0954102016000407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, B., Zicus, S., & Allen, B. (2010). Polar science and global climate: An international resource for education & outreach. Essex, UK: Pearson Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
Liggett, D. (2015). Conference reports, notes and announcements. The Polar Journal, 5(2), 470–479. doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2015.1089671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, I., Huffman, L. T., Xavier, J. C., & Walton, D. W. H. (2014). Education and polar research: Bringing polar science into the classroom. Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering, 4, 217–221.Google Scholar
Painter, J. (2011). Poles apart. The international reporting of climate scepticism. UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Provencher, J., Baeseman, J., Carlson, D., Badhe, R., Bellman, J., Hik, D., … Zicus, S. (2011). Polar research education, outreach and communication during the fourth IPY: How the 2007–2008 International Polar Year has contributed to the future of education, outreach and communication. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).Google Scholar
SAT. (2013). Final report of the thirty-sixth Antarctic Treaty consultative meeting. Brussels, 20–29 May 2013. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_finalrep.aspx?lang=e&menu=2Google Scholar
Shukman, D. (2010). An iceberg as big as Manhattan: Reporting from science’s new frontlines. London, UK: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Walton, D. W. H. (2013). Antarctica: Global science from a frozen continent. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xavier, J. C., Fugmann, G., Beck, I., Huffman, L., & Jensen, E. (2016). Education on biodiversity in the polar regions. In Castro, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Filho, W. L., and Azul, A. M. (Eds.), Biodiversity and education for sustainable development (pp. 43–56). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar