Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:04:26.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early sealing regimes: the Bering Sea fur seal regime vis-à-vis Finnish–Soviet fishing and sealing agreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2015

Nikolas Sellheim
Nikolas Sellheim*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, PO Box 122, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Environmental management had its early stages in the early years of the 20th century. This note contrasts the different regimes that emerged with regard to the management of seals and the seal hunt: the well-researched Bering Sea regime and the little known regimes between Finland and the Soviet Union. While the former shaped and already embedded principles of modern environmental law and has the seal population as its primary focus, the latter agreements did not make reference to the environmental dimension of the seal hunt, but must be read against the backdrop of the difficult border situations between the two countries.

Type
Notes
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 109 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belikov, S.E. and Boltunov, A.N.. 1998. The ringed seal (Phoca hispida) in the western Russian Arctic. In: Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. and Lydersen, C. (editors). Ringed seals in the North Atlantic. Tromsø: NAMMCO. (NAMMCO scientific publications, Vol. 1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C.. 2009. International law and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonner, W.N. 1982. Seals and man. a study of interactions. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Busch, B.C. 1985. War against the seals – A history of the North American seal fishery. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, R. 1962. Silent spring. Boston/New York: Houghton Bifflin Company.Google Scholar
Finland. 1922a. Suomen ja Venäjän sopimus kalastuksen ja hylkeenpyynnin harjoittamisesta Laatokalla, 28 lokakuu 1922 [Finnish and Russian agreement on fishing and sealing pperations in Lake Ladoga, 28 October 1922]. Helsinki: Finnish Government.Google Scholar
Finland. 1922b. Suomen ja Venäjän välinen sopimus kalastuksen ja hylkeenpyynnin harjoittamisesta molempien maiden aluevesillä Pohjoisella Jäämerellä, 21 lokakuu 1922 [Agreement between Finland and Russia on fishing and sealing operations in the waters of both countries in the Northern Arctic Ocean, 21 October 1922]. Helsinki: Finnish Government.Google Scholar
Finland (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). 2007. Management plan for the Finnish seal populations in the Baltic Sea. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
Härkönen, T., Stenman, O., Jüssi, M., Jüssi, I., Sagitov, R. and Verevkin, M.. 1998. Population size and distribution of the Baltic ringed seal. In: Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. and Lydersen, C. (editors). Ringed seals in the North Atlantic. Tromsø: NAMMCO. (NAMMCO scientific publications Vol. 1): 167–180.Google Scholar
Kenyon, K. W., Scheffer, V. B. and Chapman, D.G.. 1954. A population study of the Alaska fur-seal herd. Washington: Fish and Wildlife Service. (Special scientific report – wildlife 12).Google Scholar
Koivurova, T. 2013. Introduction to international environmental law. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulyasova, A.A. and Kulyasov, I.P.. 2009. Transformation of nature management in Pomorie: fishing villages on the Onega peninsula of the White Sea. In: Nystén-Haarala, S. (editor). Changing governance of renewable resources in northwest Russia. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1920. Peace treaty between the Republic of Finland and the Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic, 14 October 1920. New York: United Nations Treaty Service.Google Scholar
Mirovitskaya, N.S., Clark, M. and Purver, R.G.. 1993. North Pacific fur seals: regime formation as a means of resolving conflicts. In: Young, O.R. and Osherenko, G. (editors). Polar politics – Creating international environmental regimes. New York: Cornell University Press: 22–55.Google Scholar
Ray, G.C. and McCormick-Ray, J. 2014. Marine conservation – Science, policy and management. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Riley, F. 1967. Fur seal industry of the Pribilof Islands, 1786–1965. Washington D.C.: United States Department of the Interior (Circular 275).Google Scholar
Robb, C.A.R (editor). 1999. International environmental law reports, Vol. 1. Early decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellheim, N. 2015. Policies and influence. Tracing and locating the EU seal products trade regulation. International Community Law Review 17: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, I. R. 2005. Hunting marine mammals for profit and sport: H. J. Snow in the Kuril Islands and the north Pacific, 1873–96. Polar Record 41 (216): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 2007. Reports of international arbitral awards – Award between the United States and the United Kingdom relating to the rights of jurisdiction of United States in the Bering's sea and the preservation of fur seals.15 August 1893. New York: United Nations (Vol. 28): 263–276. URL: http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XXVIII/263-276.pdf (accessed 26 January 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States, Great Britain, Russia and Japan. 1911. Convention between the United States, Great Britain, Russia and Japan for the preservation and protection of fur seals of 7 July 1911. Washington D.C.: Senate of the United States.Google Scholar
United States, Canada, Japan and Soviet Union. 1957. Interim convention (with schedule) on conservation of North Pacific fur seals of 9 February 1957. Washington D.C.: United States Government.Google Scholar
USSR. 1934. Suomen ja Sosialististen Neuvostotasavaltain Liiton välinen sopimus kalastuksen ja hylkeenpyynnin harjoittamisesta Laatokalla, 25 toukokuu 1934 [Agreement between Finland and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on fishing and sealing management in Lake Ladoga, 25 May 1934]. Moscow: USSR.Google Scholar
USSR. 1944. Armistice Agreement between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, on the one hand, and Finland on the other, 19 September 1944. Moscow: USSR.Google Scholar
USSR. 1948. Ystävyys-, yhteistyö- ja avunantosopimus, 6 huhtikuu 1948 [Agreement of friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance, 6 April 1948]. Moscow: USSR.Google Scholar
USSR. 1959. Suomen Tasavallan Hallituksen ja Sosialististen Neuvostotasavaltain Liiton Hallituksen välinen sopimus kalastuksesta ja hylkeenpyynnistä, 21 helmikuu 1959 [Agreement between the governments of Finland and of the Soviet Union on fishing and sealing, 21 February 1959]. Moscow: USSR Government.Google Scholar
Ylimaunu, J. 2000. Itämeren hylkeenpyyntikulttuurit ja ihminen – hylje-suhde [Seal hunting cultures of the Baltic Sea and the human-seal-relationship]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 2010. Institutional dynamics: emergent patterns in international environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar