Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:13:44.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A critical review of design and use of field tent shelters in polar regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Xiaoying Winston Yan ,
Marijane E. England ,
Karl C. Kuivinen ,
James J. Potter  and
Nathan S. Krug
Xiaoying Winston Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 232 Arch Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0107, USA
Marijane E. England
Affiliation:
Polar Ice Coring Office, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 105 Whittier Building, Lincoln, NE 68588-0850, USA
Karl C. Kuivinen
Affiliation:
Polar Ice Coring Office, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 105 Whittier Building, Lincoln, NE 68588-0850, USA
James J. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 232 Arch Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0107, USA
Nathan S. Krug
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 232 Arch Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0107, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polar research teams often spend extended periods of time away from base stations, living and working in remote field camps of portable tents. This article reports results of a survey study conducted in 1996 of polar researchers from the United States. The study was about the design and use of portable field tents being deployed in polar areas with regard to safety, health, and well-being from the user's perspective. Preliminary analysis indicates that there existed a number of areas in design and use of the shelters that contributed to concerns of safety, health, and well-being among a considerable number of tent users. The article concludes with suggestions for designing and manufacturing portable field tents.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 34 , Issue 189 , April 1998 , pp. 113 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J.M. 1972. Arctic performance evaluation of a production model bare base personnel shelter. Washington, DC: US Air Force, Aeronautics System Division.Google Scholar
Antarctic Support Associates. 1991. Comparison report on portable field camp structure. Englewood, CO: Antarctic Support AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Brier, F.W. 1969. Polar camp improvements – structural, architectural, and utility accessories fortheJamesway shelter. Port Hueneme, CA: US Civil Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Byrne, D., Barry, J., and Nelson, D.. 1963. Relation of the revised repression-sensitization scale to measures of self-description. Psychological Reports 13: 323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrere, S. 1990. Physiological and psychological patterns of acute and chronic stress during winter isolation in Antarctica. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Irvine: University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Carrere, S., and Evans, G.W.. 1994. Life in an isolated and confined environment: a qualitative study of the role of the designed environment. Environment and Behavior 26 (6): 707–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravalho, M.A. 1994. The folk psychology of the winter experience in Antarctica. Antarctic Journal of the United States 29 (5): 382.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L., Lipman, R., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E., and Covi, L.. 1974. The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science (19): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanders, S.N. 1980. Cold regions testing of an air-transportable shelter. Hanover, NH: Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Flanders, S.N. 1982. Designing with wood fora lightweight air-transportable Arctic shelter: how materials were tested and chosen for design. In: Structural use of wood in adverse environments. New York: Van Nostrand: 385–397.Google Scholar
Floyd, P. 1974. The North Slope Center: how was it built? Northern Engineer 6 (3): 22–35.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E.K.E. 1974. Psychological studies in Antarctica: a review. In: Edholm, O.G., and Gunderson, E.K.E. (editors). Polar human biology: the proceedings of the SCAR/IUPS/IUBS Symposium on Human Biology and Medicine in the Antarctic. London: William Heinemann Medical Books: 352–361.Google Scholar
Harris, C. 1991. Environmental effects of human activities on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar RecordU (162): 193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, N.B., and Handegord, G.O.P.. 1983. Building science for a cold climate. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Johnson, P.R. 1970. The IAEEprefabricated hut. College, Alaska: University of Alaska, Institute of Arctic Environmental Engineering.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, C.B. 1976. Energy conservation in buildings. Hanover, NH: Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Leon, G. 1991. Individual and group-process characteristics of polar expedition teams. Environment and Behavior 23 (6): 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, C.,Cox, T., Burrows, G., and Lazzerini, T.. 1978. An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social Psychology (17): 283–284.Google ScholarPubMed
Marans, R., and Spreckelmeyer, K., 1981. Evaluating built environments: a behavioralapproach. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Mellor, M. 1969. Utilities on permanent snowfields. Hanover, NH: Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Mocellin, J.S.P., and Suedfeld, P.. 1991. Voices from the ice: diaries of polar explorers. Environment and Behavior 23 (6): 704–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natani, K. and Shurley, J.T.. 1979. Socio-psychological aspects of a winter vigil at South Pole Station. In: Gunderson, E. (editor). Human adaptability to Antarctic conditions. Worcester, MA: Heffernan Press (Antarctic Research Series 22): 89–114.Google Scholar
Oakley, E.N.H. 1986. First Antarctic winter in tents: the Joint Services Expedition to Brabant Island. Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Services 72: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offen, J.L. 1994. Voices at the bottom of the world: community identity in McMurdo. Antarctic Journal of the United States 29 (5): 383.Google Scholar
Osherenko, G. 1992. Human/nature relations in the Arctic: changing perspectives. Polar Record 28 (167): 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, M. 1992. Expedition huts in Antarctica: 1899–1917. Polar Record 28 (167): 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preiser, W.F.E., Rabinowitz, H.Z., and White, E.T.. 1988. Post occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold CompanyGoogle Scholar
Richter, D.L. 1979. South Pole dome revisited. The Military Engineer 01–02: 2–5.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. 1991. Polar psychology: an overview. Environment and Behavior 23 (6): 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suedfeld, P. 1987. Extreme and unusual environments. In: Stokols, D., and Altman, I. (editors). Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 863–887.Google Scholar
Ursin, H., and 12 others. 1991. Psychobiological studies of individuals in small, isolated groups in the Antarctic and in space analogous. Environment and Behavior 23 (6): 766–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar