Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:16:07.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities: a major addition to the Antarctic Treaty System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Peter J. Beck
Peter J. Beck
Affiliation:
Faculty of Human Sciences, Kingston Polytechnic, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In June 1988, at the final session of the Fourth Special Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting in Wellington, New Zealand, the Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities (CRAMRA) was adopted, bringing to a successful conclusion six years of negotiations. Christopher Beeby, chairman of the discussions, presented the convention as the most important political development affecting Antarctica since the 1959 treaty, especially as it established the ability of the Antarctic Treaty System to reach an internal accommodation even upon matters raising serious political, legal, environmental and other issues. There remain uncertainties regarding the future development of the Antarctic minerals question; for example, when will the minerals convention and the proposed institutional framework come into effect, will its ratification encourage mining, can the fragile Antarctic environment be adequately protected against mining, how will certain key terms and concepts be defined, and will the regime's operation bring latent tensions to the surface? It is also difficult to predict how other governments will react to the convention, in the light of recent UN resolutions on Antarctica. The convention is perceived within the Antarctic Treaty system as a significant development, but it will be some time before a considered evaluation of the Antarctic Minerals Regime can be conducted.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 25 , Issue 152 , January 1989 , pp. 19 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antarctic Treaty, Special ATCM 1988. Final report of the Fourth Special Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting on Antarctic Mineral Resources, 2 06: 1–6.Google Scholar
Auburn, F. M. 1984. Antarctic minerals and the Third World. Fram:thejoumalofpolarstudies, 1(1):201–23.Google Scholar
Barker, N. and Masters, A. 1986. Red ice. London, Constable.Google Scholar
BBC 1986. Antarctica: the last great land grab on earth. British Broadcasting Corporation, Radio 4, File on Four, 2 12.Google Scholar
Beck, P. J. 1986. The international politics of Antarctica. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Beck, P. J. 1988a. The Antarctic Minerals Regime negotiations. Polar Record, 23 (148): 59–61.Google Scholar
Beck, P. J. 1988b. Another sterile annual ritual?: The United Nations and Antarctica 1987. Polar Record, 23 (150): 207–12.Google Scholar
Beeby, C. D. 1982. An overview of the problems which will be addressed in the preparation of a regime governing the mineral resources of Antarctica. In Vicuña, F. O. (editor), Antarctic resources policy: Scientific, legal and political issues. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 191–98.Google Scholar
Beeby, C. 1988. Antarctic Minerals Convention. Unpublished article provided by Government of New Zealand: copy deposited in SPRI Library.Google Scholar
Charney, J. 1982. Future strategies for an Antarctic Mineral Resource Regime — can the environment be protected? In Charney, J. (editor), The new nationalism and the use of common spaces. Issues in marine pollution and the exploitation of Antarctica. Totowa NJ, Allanheld and Osmun: 206–38.Google Scholar
De Wit, M. J. 1985. Minerals and mining in Antarctica: science and technology, economics and politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dominion 1988. Editorial: Calling the Antarctic Club to account. Wellington, New Zealand. 17 01.Google Scholar
Eco 1987a. Reflections. Eco 41(1–2): 1–2.Google Scholar
Eco 1987b. The great crash. Eco 46(2): 1–4.Google Scholar
Eco 1988a. The Convention proceeds. Eco 48 (12): 1–2.Google Scholar
Eco 1988b. Beeby 5: miners' delight, safeguards slight. Eco 47(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Eco 1988c. Minerals negotiations: an environmental tragedy. Eco 48 (1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Eco 1988d. Convention too hard, Treaty Park next. Eco, 47 (6): 1–2.Google Scholar
Eco 1988e. A miner's dream. Eco, 47 (4): 1–3.Google Scholar
Evening Post. 1988. The protecting of Antarctica? Wellington, New Zealand. 5 05.Google Scholar
Greenpeace. 1988. News Release, 8 01 1988: 1–3.Google Scholar
Handbook of the Antarctic Treaty System. 1987. 5th ed., Pt. 1. Cambridge, Scott Polar Research Institute.Google Scholar
Joyner, C. 1985. Anglo–Argentine rivalry after the Falklands: on the road to Antarctica?. In Coll, A. R. and Arend, A. C. (editors), The Falklands war: lessons for strategy, diplomacy and international law. London, Allen and Unwin: 189–211.Google Scholar
Joyner, C. and Lipperman, P. J. 1986. Conflicting jurisdictions in the Southern Ocean: the case of an Antarctic Minerals Regime. Virginia Journal of International Law, 27 (1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Joyner, C. 1987. The Antarctic minerals negotiating process. American Journal of International Law, 81 (4): 888–905.Google Scholar
Kimball, L. A. 1988. Special report on the Antarctic Minerals Convention. Washington DC, International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Larminie, F. G. 1987. Mineral resources: commercial prospects for Antarctic minerals. In Triggs, G. D. (editor), The Antarctic Treaty Regime: law, environment and resources. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 176–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Government. 1988. Press Statement, 3 06: 1–4 (see UN 1988b).Google Scholar
Nicholson, I. E. 1986. Antarctic tourism: the need for a legal regime? Maritime Studies, 29: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutford, R. H. (editor). 1986. Antarctic environmental implications of possible mineral exploration and exploitation. Cambridge, SCAR and Scott Polar Research Institute.Google Scholar
Sanderson, T. J. O. 1983. Offshore oil development in polar regions. Paper presented to Pacific Science Congress, Dunedin, 1983, in Australian Government, Antarctica: Appendices to Australian Contribution in response to the Request from the Secretary-General of the United Nations, vol.1 (1984). Canberra, Australian Government.Google Scholar
UN 1983. United Nations General Assembly Records 38th Session, First Committee, 42nd meeting, 28 11, A/C 1/38/PV 42.Google Scholar
UN 1984. United Nations General Assembly Records 39th Session, First Committee, 52nd meeting, 29 11, A/C 1/39/PV 52.Google Scholar
UN 1987. United Nations General Assembly Records 42nd Session, Resolutions Adopted by the General Assembly 1987.Google Scholar
UN 1988a. United Nations General Assembly Records 43rd Session, Letter from Permanent Malaysian Mission at the UN to the Secretary-General, 8 June.Google Scholar
UN 1988b. United Nations General Assembly Records 43rd Session, Letter from Permanent Australian Mission at the UN to the Secretary-General, 30 June.Google Scholar
Watts, A. D. 1986. A British perspective. In Millar, T. B. (editor). Australia, Britain and Antarctica. London, Australian Studies Centre at the University of London: 51–9.Google Scholar
Watts, A. D. 1987. Antarctic mineral resources: negotiations for a Mineral Resources Regime. In Triggs, G. D. (editor), The Antarctic Treaty Regime: law, environment and resources. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 164–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar