Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:27:17.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Australian and Canadian initiatives in polar marine environmental protection: a comparative review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Donald R. Rothwell
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, 173–175 Phillip Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia

Abstract

Increasing attention has been given to the protection of the polar marine environment throughout the 1990s. In the case of the Antarctic Treaty System, in addition to a number of recommendations and measures adopted at Antarctic Treaty Meetings, the 1991 Madrid Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty contains a number of measures that will enhance marine environmental protection in the Southern Ocean. In the case of the Arctic, the 1991 Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy identified marine pollution as being one of the major environmental issues in the Arctic, and a number of initiatives have since been developed to encourage the Arctic states to deal with the problem collectively and individually. However, while the collective responses of the polar states have been helpful in giving prominence to the importance of marine environmental protection in polar waters, it is the coastal states of the polar regions that need to take responsibility to give effect to these initiatives. Australia and Canada are two of the most prominent polar states in Antarctica and the Arctic, respectively. Both have large maritime claims and have also developed a range of domestic legal and policy responses to enhance marine environmental protection in the polar regions. A review is undertaken of the respective global and regional marine environmental protection regimes that apply in the polar regions, followed by a comparative analysis of the Australian and Canadian initiatives.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attard, D.J. 1987. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1979a. Gazette 189, 26 09 1979. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1979b. Gazette S 225, 31 10 1979. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1980a. Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1980b. Whale Protection Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1981. Antarctic Marine Living Resources Conservation Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1983. Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1986. Antarctic Seals Conservation Regulations. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1991a. Antarctic Mining Prohibition Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1991b. Fisheries Management Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1994a. Gazette No S 290, 29 07 1994. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1994b. Maritime Legislation Amendment Act. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, Commonwealth of. 1994c. Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) (Waste Management) Regulations. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printery.Google Scholar
Australia, House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs. 1992. Australian law in Antarctica. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
Beckman, L. 1994. Marine conservation in the Canadian Arctic. Northern Perspectives 22 (2/3): 3339.Google Scholar
Blay, S., and Green, J.. 1994. The practicalities of domestic legislation to prohibit mining activity in Antarctica: a comment on the Australian perspective. Polar Record 30(172): 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. (editor). 1992. Australian practice in international law 1990 and 1991. Australian Yearbook of International Law 13: 277.Google Scholar
Brubaker, D. 1993. Marine pollution and international law. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Bush, W.M. 1982–. Antarctica and international law: a collection of inter-state and national documents (3 volumes, continuing in loose-leaf format). New York: Oceana.Google Scholar
Canada. 1964. Territorial Sea and Fishing Zones Act. Statues of Canada, Vol I, chapter 22. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 1970a. Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act. Statutes of Canada, Vol I, chapter 47. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 1970b. Act to amend the Territorial Sea and Fishing Zones Act. Statutes of Canada, Vol II, chapter 68. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 1970c. Canadian declaration concerning the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. International Legal Materials 9: 598.Google Scholar
Canada. 1985a. Statement by the Hon J. Clark, Minister for External Affairs. House of Commons Debates 5: 6463 (10 09 1985).Google Scholar
Canada. 1985b. Canada Shipping Act. Revised Statutes of Canada, chapter S-9. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 1985c. Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Revised Statutes of Canada, chapter 16 (4th Supplement). Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 1985d. Fisheries Act. Revised Statutes of Canada, chapter F-14. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 1996. Oceans Act. Statutes of Canada, chapter 31. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Chircop, A., Kindred, H., Saunders, P., and VanderZwaag, D.. 1995. Legislating for integrated marine management: Canada's proposed Oceans Act of 1996. Canadian Yearbook of International Law 33: 305331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J., and Rothwell, D.R.. 1992. Legal issues confronting Australia's Antarctica. Australian Yearbook of International Law 13: 5388.Google Scholar
Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, Canada. 1991. The Arctic Environmental Strategy. Hull: Department of Indian and Northern Affairs.Google Scholar
Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, Canada. 1996. The Arctic Environmental Strategy: five years of progress. Hull: Department of Indian and Northern Affairs.Google Scholar
Environment Australia. 1998. Australia's ocean policy: an issues paper. Canberra: Environment Australia.Google Scholar
Francioni, F. 1993. The Madrid Protocol on protection of the Antarctic environment. Texas International Law Journal 28: 4772.Google Scholar
Hege, M.R. 1996. Report to the Arctic ministers: PAME working group publishes findings. WWF Arctic Bulletin 1: 67.Google Scholar
Howard, R. 1991. Arctic protection program unveiled. The Globe and Mail 30 04 1991: A4.Google Scholar
Joyner, C.C. 1985. The Southern Ocean and marine pollution: problems and prospects. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 17: 165194.Google Scholar
Joyner, C.C. 1992. Antarctica and the law of the sea. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, S. 1995. Australia's maritime boundaries. Wollongong: Centre for Maritime Policy, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
Kaye, S., and Rothwell, D.R.. 1995. Australia's Antarctic maritime claims and boundaries. Ocean Development and International Law 26: 195226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, R.F. 1992. Canada's Arctic Environmental Strategy: critique and prospect. Northern Review 8/9: 83113.Google Scholar
L.K., Kriwoken, and Cote, R.P.. 1996. Developments in Australian and Canadian marine environmental management. In: Kriwoken, L.K., Haward, M., Davis, B., and VanderZwaag, D. (editors). Oceans law and policy in the post-UNCED era: Australian and Canadian perspectives. London: Kluwer Law International: 215242.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B. 1989. The 200 mile exclusive economic zone in the new law of the sea. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lamson, C., and VanderZwaag, D.. 1987. Arctic waters: needs and options for Canadian-American cooperation. Ocean Development and International Law 18: 4999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, E. 1997. PAME working group meets in Canada. WWF Arctic Bulletin 4/97: 10.Google Scholar
McDorman, T.L. 1996. Canada's ocean limits and boundaries: an overview. In: Kriwoken, L.K., Haward, M., Davis, B., and VanderZwaag, D. (editors). Oceans law and policy in thepost-UNCED era: Australian and Canadian perspectives. London: Kluwer Law International: 113139.Google Scholar
McLachlan, I. 1998. Another foreign fishing vessel apprehended in Southern Ocean. Office of the Minister for Defence Media Release MIN 25/98: 25 02 1998. (http://www.adfa.oz.au/DOD/Press/1988/02598.html).Google Scholar
McRae, D.M., and Goundrey, D.J.. 1982. Environmental jurisdiction in the Arctic waters: the extent of Article 234. University of British Columbia Law Review 16: 197228.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. 1997. AMAP report highlights pollution in the Arctic. WWF Arctic Bulletin 2/97: 67.Google Scholar
O'Connell, D.P. 1982. The international law of the sea. Vol 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pharand, D. 1973. The law of the sea of the Arctic with special reference to Canada. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Pullen, T.C. 1987. What price Canadian sovereignty? Proceedings of the US Naval Institute 113 (9): 6672.Google Scholar
Reid, R.S. 1974. The Canadian claim to sovereignty over the waters of the Arctic. Canadian Yearbook of International Law 12: 111136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, D.R. 1995a. International law and the protection of the Arctic environment. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 44: 280312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, D.R. 1995b. The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy and international environmental cooperation in the far north. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 6: 65105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, I.A. 1995. Australia's new maritime zones. Australian Law Journal 69: 2629.Google Scholar
Trudeau, P.E. 1970. Canadian Prime Minister's remarks on the proposed legislation. International Legal Materials 9: 600604.Google Scholar
VanderZwaag, D. 1996. Canada and marine environmental protection. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
VanderZwaag, D. 1997. International law and Arctic marine conservation and protection: a slushy, shifting seascape. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 9: 303345.Google Scholar
VanderZwaag, D., Donihee, J., and Faegteborg, M.. 1988. Towards regional ocean management in the Arctic: from co-existence to cooperation. UNB Law Journal 37: 133.Google Scholar
VanderZwaag, D., Huebert, R., and Hurtzman, O.. 1996. The Arctic marine environment: not a pristine pole apart. In: Kriwoken, L.K., Haward, M., Davis, B., and VanderZwaag, D. (editors). Oceans law and policy in the post-UNCED era: Australian and Canadian perspectives. London: Kluwer Law International: 351388.Google Scholar
Vidas, D. 1996. Protecting the polar marine environment through regional cooperation. POLOS Report 2/1996. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.Google Scholar
Westermeyer, W.E., and Goyal, V.. 1986. Jurisdiction and management of Arctic marine transportation. Arctic 39: 338349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Working Group on the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna. 1994. The state of protected areas in the circumpolar Arctic 1994. Trondheim: Directorate for Nature Management (Norway)Google Scholar
Working Group on the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment. 1994. Report from the first meeting, Oslo, Norway, 3–5 May 1994. Unpublished document produced for the Working Group on the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment.Google Scholar