Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:55:01.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antarctic environmental planning and management: conclusions from Casey, Australian Antarctic Territory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Lorne K. Kriwoken
Lorne K. Kriwoken
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Antarctic environment has undergone significant local environmental damage and degradation, with nations rebuilding, expanding, or developing stations and bases. The Australian Antarctic Division's ten-year (1985–95) A$76.704 million programme of rebuilding and expanding stations in Australian Antarctic Territory is representative of a continent-wide increase in station numbers and impact, increasing station size, human numbers, lengths of roads, buildings, waste material production, and energy requirements. Environmental planning and impact assessment have not been incorporated in official decision-making; human activities at Australian Antarctic Territory stations had serious impacts on the limited ice-free land and local flora and fauna. Casey, are-developed station, is examined with reference to environmental planning and management under Antarctic Treaty obligations and recent Australian environmental legislation. Recommendations include the setting up of an Australian Antarctic Resources Committee responsible inter alia for environmental planning and management, including regional and station management plans and cumulative and environmental impact assessment for all Antarctic operations.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 27 , Issue 160 , January 1991 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANARE News. 1987. Antarctic budget 1987/88. Anare News 52 (12): 14.Google Scholar
Antarctic Science Advisory Committee. 1986. Overall priorities in Australian Antarctic Science. Canberra, Department of Science (Second Occasional Paper).Google Scholar
Australia. 1981a. Background paper on the Antarctic environment with particular reference to the proposed rebuilding of Australian Antarctic stations. Canberra, Department of Housing and Department of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Australia. 1981b. Minutes of evidence relating to redevelopment of Australian Antarctic bases, Part I and II. Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works. Canberra, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australia. 1985. The natural resources of the Australian Antarctic Territory. Senate Standing Committee on National Resources. Parliamentary Paper No 495/1985. Canberra, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australia 1988. Antarctic rebuilding programme steering committee meeting, Hobart, Tasmania, 31 August. Hobart, Australian Construction Services.Google Scholar
Bates, G. 1983. Environmental law in Australia. Melbourne, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Beanlands, G. E. and Duinker, P. N. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Halifax, Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
Benninghoff, W. S. and Bonner, W. N. 1985. Man's impact on the Antarctic environment: a procedure for evaluating impacts from scientific and logistic activities. Cambridge, Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research.Google Scholar
Bonner, W. N. 1984. Conservation and the Antarctic. In: Laws, R. M. (editor). Antarctic ecology. London, Academic Press. Vol. 2: 821–40.Google Scholar
Buckley, R. 1988. Critical problems in environmental planning and management. Environmental and Planning Law Journal 5 (3): 206–25.Google Scholar
Chester, J. 1986. Going to extremes: Project Blizzard and Australia's Antarctic heritage. Sydney, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Headland, R. K. and Keage, P. L. 1985. Activities on the King George Island group, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Record 22 (140): 475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Brisbane, John Wiley (International Series on Applied Systems Analysis 3.)Google Scholar
Keage, P. L. 1986. Antarctic protected areas: future options. Occasional Paper 19. Centre for Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
Keage, P. L and Quilty, P. G. 1988. Future directions for Antarctic environmental studies. Maritime Studies 38 (01/02): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, H. 1987. Environmental impact assessment in New Zealand's Antarctic programme—where to from here? New Zealand Antarctic Record 8 (1): 9–16.Google Scholar
Kriwoken, L. K. and Keage, P. K. (1989). Antarctic environmental politics: protected areas. In: Handmer, J. and Birgin, R. (editors). Antarctica: policies and policy development. Canberra, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University: Chapter 5: 31–48.Google Scholar
Law, P. 1983. Antarcticodyssey. Melbourne, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lewis-Smith, R. 1986. Environmental impact and related matters in the Casey station area. (Unpublished manuscript). Cambridge, British Antarctic Survey.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 1979. United States Antarctic Programme draft environmental impact statement. Washington, Division of Polar Programmes.Google Scholar
Sonntag, N. C., Everitt, R. R., Rattie, L. P., Colnett, D. L., Wolf, C. P., Truett, J. C., Dorcey, A. H. J. and Holling, C. S. 1987. Cumulative effects assessment: a context for further research and development. Hull, Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council.Google Scholar