Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:54:30.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Is a Text Today?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

At the risk of seeming peevish, i should begin by noting that the title “what is a text today?” is not mine. this point strikes me as important, perhaps even urgent, but not because the title must be discarded. On the contrary, it has become all the more important to retain because it contains today, a word that in denoting the interval between yesterday and tomorrow used to call up that which is simply now but which in the wake of 11 September 2001 has come to connote the rupture that separates “America” from the world it thought it had been contracted to police. Thus, if one were to rephrase “my” title, would it not make sense to write, “Is there a text after 11 September 2001?” (to evoke yet again Theodor Adorno's still-haunting question concerning the link between poetry and the Holocaust)? Put this way—and why not begin by raising the stakes as high as possible?—the query tempts one to reply, “Even if there is a text that belongs to this state of exception, who could possibly care?” Are there not more pressing matters? If there are, if the matter at hand is as clear as all that, then neither you nor I have any business persisting beyond this point.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor. Negative Dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. New York: Continuum, 1983.Google Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. Who Killed Shakespeare? What's Happened to English since the Radical Sixties. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Vol. 1. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson. New York: Columbia UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Columbia UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “The Politics of Theory.” The Ideologies of Theory: Essays 1971–1986. Vol. 2. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988. 103–13.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Margo. “On Writers and Writing: Texts for Our Time.” New York Times Book Review 30 Sept. 2001: 27.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Tristes Tropiques. Trans. John Russell. New York: Atheneum, 1970.Google Scholar
Mattelart, Armand. The Invention of Communication. Trans. Susan Emanuel. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1996.Google Scholar
Mowitt, John. Text: The Genealogy of an Antidisciplinary Object. Durham: Duke UP, 1992.Google Scholar