Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:39:43.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unruly Rhetorics: Disability, Animality, and New Kinship Compositions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Shannon Walters
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“I was sure it would make a great story, first for telling and then for writing down,” writes harriet MCbryde Johnson, explaining why she accepts an invitation from Peter Singer to a debate at Princeton University (2003). Initially, Johnson, a disability-rights activist and lawyer who has a neuromuscular disease, is unsure how to interact with Singer, whose philosophy of preferential utilitarianism argues that it is ethical to kill babies born with severe disabilities. Johnson first encounters Singer at an event at the College of Charleston, and she looks to the rules of decorum to help her decide how to handle the situation. When she sees Singer talking to friends, she considers leaving before even being introduced to him. “Hereabouts,” however, “the rule is that if you're not prepared to shoot on sight, you have to be prepared to shake hands. I give Singer the three fingers on my right hand that still work. ‘Good afternoon, Mr. Singer. I'm here for Not Dead Yet.‘ I want to think he flinches just a little” (204 [2005]).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 471 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bizzell, Patricia, and Herzberg, Bruce, eds. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. 2nd. ed. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin's, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, Brenda Jo. Lend Me Your Ear: Rhetorical Constructions of Deafness. Washington: Gallaudet UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, Brenda Jo, and Fredal, James. “Studying Disability Rhetorically”. Disability Studies Quarterly 17.4 (1997): 251–57. Print.Google Scholar
Chen, Mel Y. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham: Duke UP, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Cicero. De oratore. Trans. Sutton, E. W. and Rackham, H. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1942. Print.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation. Cambridge: South End, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. New York: Verso, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Detienne, Marcel, and Vernant, Jean-Pierre. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Trans. Lloyd, Janet. New Jersey: Humanities, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay. “‘Breathe upon Us an Even Flame’: Hephaestus, History and the Body of Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 25.2 (2006): 119–40. Print.Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse UP, 2014. Print.Google Scholar
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. “Disability Studies: A Field Emerged”. American Quarterly 65.4 (2013): 915–26. Print.Google Scholar
Grandin, Temple. Thinking in Pictures: And Other Reports from My Life with Autism. New York: Vintage, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Isocrates. Antidosis. Isocrates. Trans. Norlin, George. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Harvard UP; London: Heinemann, 1929. 181–367. Print.Google Scholar
Johnson, Harriet McBryde. “Unspeakable Conversations.” New York Times Magazine 16 Feb. 2003: n. pag. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.Google Scholar
Johnson, Harriet McBryde. “Unspeakable Conversations.” Too Late to Die Young: Nearly True Tales from a Life. New York: Picador-Holt, 2005. 201–28. Print.Google Scholar
Kuusisto, Stephen. Planet of the Blind. New York: Delta, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. “Ableist Rhetorics, Nevertheless: Disability and Animal Rights in the Work of Peter Singer and Martha Nussbaum”. JAC 31.1-2 (2011): 71–101. Print.Google Scholar
Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. “Rethinking Rhetoric through Mental Disabilities”. Rhetoric Review 22.2 (2003): 154–202. Print.Google Scholar
Mairs, Nancy. Plaintext: Essays. New York: Harper, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
McRuer, Robert. “Composing Bodies; or, De-composition: Queer Theory, Disability Studies, and Alternative Corporealities”. JAC 24.1 (2004): 47–77. Print.Google Scholar
Michalko, Rod. The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Catherine. “On the Rhetorics of Mental Disability.” Wilson and Lewiecki-Wilson, Embodied Rhetorics 45–60.Google Scholar
Price, Margaret. Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince-Hughes, Dawn. Songs of the Gorilla Nation: My Journey through Autism. New York: Harmony, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Taylor, Sunaura. “Beasts of Burden: Disability Studies and Animal Rights”. Qui Parle 19.2 (2011): 191–222. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Shannon. “Animal Athena: The Interspecies Mētis of Women Writers with Autism”. JAC 30.3-4 (2010): 683–711. Print.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathleen. The Contemporary Reception of Classical Rhetoric: Appropriations of Ancient Discourse. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Wilson, James C., and Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. “Disability, Rhetoric, and the Body.” Wilson and Lewiecki-Wilson, Embodied Rhetorics 1–24.Google Scholar
…., eds. Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Cary. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2009. Print.Google Scholar