Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:51:22.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Theory of Resonance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

Does a literary text remain the same object across time? This essay answers no and bases a defense of literature on that answer. Temporal extension, a phenomenon neglected in contemporary literary studies, makes some meanings unrecoverable and others newly possible. A text endures as a nonintegral survivor, an echo of what it was and of what it might become, its resonance changing with shifts in interpretive contexts. Since this resonance cannot be addressed by synchronic historicism, I propose an alternative, diachronic historicism, inspired especially by scientific theories on background noise, by Einstein's account of the relativity of simultaneity, and by critiques of the visual bias in Western epistemology. I try to theorize the text as a temporal continuum, thick with receding and incipient nuances, exercising the ears of readers in divergent ways and yielding its words to contrary claims. Literature thus encourages a semantic democracy that honors disagreement as a crucial fact of civil society.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 112 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 1060 - 1071
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, TheodorOn the Fetish Character of Music and the Regression of Listening.” The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Ed. Bernstein, J. M. London: Routledge, 1991. 2652.Google Scholar
Aitchison, Jean. Seeds of Speech: Language Origin and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Alteri, CharlesPlato's Performative Sublime and the Ends of Reading.” New Literary History 16 (1985): 251–25.Google Scholar
Auden, W. H. The Enchafed Flood. New York: Random, 1950.Google Scholar
Baker, Houston A. Jr. Blues, Ideology, and Afro-American Literature. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. Watching English Change: An Introduction to the Study of Linguistic Change in the Twentieth Century. London: Longman, 1994.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Harcourt, 1994.Google Scholar
Boethius The Consolation of Philosophy. Trans. Green, Richard. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Boslough, John. Masters of Time: Cosmology at the End of Innocence. Reading: Wesley, 1995.Google Scholar
Bryson, Norman. Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze. New Haven: Yale UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Residues of Justice: Literature, Law, Philosophy. Berkeley: U of California P, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, John K., Wilkens, Lon, Pantazelou, Eleni, and Moss, Frank “Noise Enhancement of Information Transfer in Crayfish Mechanoreceptors by Stochastic Resonance.” Nature 23 Sept. 1993: 337–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y. The Heritage of Giotto's Geometry: Art and Science on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y. The Renaissance Discovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic, 1975.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. 15th ed. New York: Crown, 1961.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. Invisible Man. New York: Random, 1952.Google Scholar
Ferguson, FrancesA Commentary on Suzanne Guerlac's ‘Longinus and the Subject of the Sublime.‘New Literary History 16 (1985): 291–29.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard. QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
Fry, Paul. A Defense of Poetry. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Interface between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen JayCaring Groups and Selfish Genes.” The Panda's Thumb. New York: Norton, 1980. 8592.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, StephenResonance and Wonder.” Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display. Ed. Karp, Ivan and Lavine, Steven D. Washington: Smithsonian Inst., 1991.42-56.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas. The Vulnerable Text: Essays on Renaissance Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Lenhardt, Christian and Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. Cambridge: MIT P, 1990.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey HWords and Wounds.” Saving the Text: Literature, Derrida, Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1981. 118–11.Google Scholar
Havelock, Eric. Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Hawking, Stephen. A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. New York: Bantam, 1988.Google Scholar
Hertz, NeilA Reading of Longinus.” The End of the Line. New York: Columbia UP, 1985. 120.Google Scholar
Hollander, John. Vision and Resonance: Two Senses of Poetic Form. New York: Oxford UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Horgan, John. The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. Reading: Wesley, 1996.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Ivins, William M. On the Rationalization of Sight. 1938. New York: Da Capo, 1973.Google Scholar
Jay, MartinScopic Regimes of Modernity.” Vision and Visuality. Ed. Foster, Hal. Seattle: Bay, 1988. 328.Google Scholar
Jenks, ChrisThe Centrality of the Eye in Western Culture: An Introduction.” Visual Culture. Ed. Jenks. London: Routledge, 1995. 125.Google Scholar
Johnson, BarbaraMelville's Fist: The Execution of Billy Budd.” The Critical Difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980. 79109.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Bernard, J. H. New York: Macmillan, 1951.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. On Language Change. Trans. Nerlich, Brigitte. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Knapp, Steven. Literary Interest. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Metaphysics and Measurement. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Kubovy, Michael. The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Labov, William. Principles of Linguistic Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Longinus On the Sublime. Trans. Roberts, W. Rhys. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1907.Google Scholar
Maddox, John “Bringing More Order Out of Noisiness.” Nature 26 May 1994: 271.Google Scholar
McMahon, April. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. Billy Budd. Billy Budd and Other Stories. New York: Viking, 1986. 291385.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. TEye and Ear: Edmund Burke and the Politics of Sensibility.” Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986. 116–11.Google Scholar
Moss, Frank, and Wiesenfeld, Kurt “The Benefits of Background Noise.” Scientific American Aug. 1995: 6669.Google Scholar
Mulvey, LauraVisual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16.3 (1975): 618. Rpt. in Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1989. 1426.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter. Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Pais, Abraham. Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Perspective as Symbolic Form. Trans. Wood, Christopher S. New York: Zone, 1991. Trans, of Die Perspektive als “symbolische Form.” Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg, 1924-1925. 258330.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. The Language Instinct. New York: Perennial-Harper, 1994.Google Scholar
Plato Phaedrus. Plato, Symposium and Phaedrus 4592.Google Scholar
Plato The Republic. Trans. Jowett, Benjamin. New York: Vintage, 1991.Google Scholar
Plato Symposium. Plato, Symposium and Phaedrus 143.Google Scholar
Plato Symposium and Phaedrus. Trans. Jowett, Benjamin. New York: Dover, 1993.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. Set Theory and Its Logic. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Quine, W. VSpeaking of Objects.” “Ontological Relativity” and Other Essays. New York: Columbia UP, 1969. 125.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT P, 1960.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Trans. McLaughlin, Kathleen and Pellauer, David. 2 vols. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Essays on the Origins of Language. Trans. Moran, John H. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1966.Google Scholar
Schweber, Silvan S. QED and the Men Who Made It: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990.Google Scholar
Stafford, Barbara Maria. Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education. Cambridge: MIT P, 1994.Google Scholar
Stewart, Garrett. Reading Voices: Literature and the Phonotext. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, Kip S. Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy. New York: Norton, 1994.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. Language Change. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. The New Science. Trans. Bergin, Thomas Goddard and Fisch, Max Harold. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Vincent, Howard P Introduction. Twentieth Century Interpretations of “Billy Budd.” Ed. Vincent. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1971. 110.Google Scholar
Wiesenfeld, Kurt, and Moss, FrankStochastic Resonance and the Benefits of Noise: From Ice Ages to Crayfish and Squids.” Nature 5 Jan. 1995: 3336.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford UP, 1976.Google Scholar