Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:30:54.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Theological Dogma of Paradise Lost, III, 173–202

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Maurice Kelley*
Affiliation:
Princeton University

Extract

In Milton's attempt to justify the ways of God to men, perhaps no passage in Paradise Lost is more important than Book III, 173–202, for in these lines Milton expounds his doctrine of predestination and its concordance with the mercy, grace, and wisdom of God. To the average reader, however, the passage offers considerable difficulty; and it is indeed surprising, in view of the importance and the obscurity of this portion of the epic, that editors and scholars have done so little to clarify the doctrine of these thirty lines. Newton contented himself with asserting that the views there expounded were Calvinistic, and Todd followed Newton. Sumner, without comment, showed a parallelism between portions of the passage and Milton's De doctrina, a document which is uncompromisingly Arminian. Brydges, however, repeated Newton's observation; and Barber argued at some length for a Calvinistic interpretation. Verity, on the other hand, seemed to agree with Sumner, but dismissed the matter with a single sentence: “The doctrine of predestination here alluded to is discussed at some length in the Christian Doctrine, I, 4.” Masson, Browne, and Moody, in turn, ignored the matter. Such disagreement, therefore, would seem to justify an attempt to throw more light on the passage by determining the precise doctrine that Milton there advances and the relation of that doctrine to the view on predestination advanced in the De doctrina.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 75 note 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this paragraph are to notes on Paradise Lost, iii, 183–84.

page 75 note 2 The Prose Works of John Milton, Bohn Library, iv, 43 ff.

page 75 note 3 Bibliotheca Sacra, xvi (1859), 557 ff; xvii (1860), 1 ff.

page 76 note 4 Westminster Confession, iii, 5.

page 76 note 5 Ibid., iii, 7.

page 76 note 6 The Prose Works of John Milton, Bohn Library, iv, 43. See also Paradise Lost, iii, 302; xii, 425–26.

page 76 note 7 Prose Works, iv, 285.

page 77 note 8 Ibid., iv, 61.

page 77 note 9 Ibid., iv, 48.

page 77 note 10 An interpretation of this passage will be offered below.

page 77 note 11 Ibid., iv, 64.

page 77 note 12 Ibid., iv, 66.

page 77 note 13 Ibid., iv, 65.

page 78 note 14 Ibid., iv, 59.—Milton equates conscience and reason. See iv, 15 and P.L., ix, 351–352; xii, 82–90.

page 78 note 15 Ibid., iv, 323.

page 78 note 16 Ibid., iv, 201.

page 78 note 17 Ibid., iv, 203.

page 78 note 18 Prose Works, iv, 207.

page 78 note 19 Ibid., iv, 70.

page 79 note 20 Ibid., iv, 49.

page 79 note 21 If one did not hesitate to push matters too far, he might suggest that Milton's use of rest rather than the correlative others was due to the following comment: “So Matt. xx. 16 ‘many be called, but few chosen’ only signifies that they which believe are few” (Prose Works, iv, 54).