Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:41:17.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sustainable This, Sustainable That: New Materialisms, Posthumanism, and Unknown Futures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

mornings in the unknown future. Who shall repair this now. And how the future

takes shape

too quickly. The permanent is ebbing. Is leaving

—Jorie Graham, “Sea Change”

Conserving This, Conserving That

Just a few lines from jorie graham's poem “sea change” evoke anxiety about unpredictable futures that arrive too soon, in need of repair. The abrupt departure of a sense of permanence may provoke the desire to arrest change, to shore up solidity, to make things, systems, standards of living “sustainable.” Having worked in the environmental humanities and in science studies for the last decade and having served as the academic cochair of the University Sustainability Committee at the University of Texas, Arlington, for several years, I have been struck by how the discourse of sustainability at the turn of the twenty-first century in the United States echoes the discourse of conservation at the turn of the twentieth century, especially in its tendency to render the lively world a storehouse of supplies for the elite. Gifford Pinchot, Theodore Roosevelt's head of forestry, defined forests as “manufacturing plants for wood,” epitomizing the utilitarianism of the conservation movement of the Progressive era, which saw nature as a resource for human use. By the early twentieth century Pinchot's deadening conception of nature jostled with other ideas, such as those of aesthetic conservation and the fledgling science of ecology. Pinchot was joined by the Progressive women conservationists, who claimed, as part of the broader “municipal housekeeping” movement, that women had special domestic talents for conservation, such as “turning yesterday's roast into tomorrow's hash.” Many Progressive women conservationists not only bolstered traditional gender roles but also wove classism and racism into their conservation mission, as conservation became bound up with conserving their own privileges. The anthropocentrism of the Progressive women conservationists is notable. As a participant in the First National Conservation Congress stated in 1909, “Why do we care about forests and streams? Because of the children who are to be naked and bare and poor without them in the years to come unless you men of this great conservation work do well your work.” During their conventions the discourse of conservation was playfully and not so playfully extended to myriad causes, including conserving food, conserving the home, conserving morals, conserving “true womanliness,” conserving “the race,” conserving “the farmer's wife,” and conserving time by omitting a speech (Alaimo, Undomesticated Ground 63–70).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

AASHE Member Directory.” AASHE: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. Assn. for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Educ., n.d. Web. 4 Apr. 2012.Google Scholar
Adamson, Joni. “Indigenous Literatures, Multinaturalism, and Avatar: The Emergence of Indigenous Cosmopolitics.” Sustainability in America. Spec. issue of American Literary History 24.1 (2012): 143–62. Print.Google Scholar
Agyeman, J.Toward a ‘Just’ Sustainability?Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 22.6 (2008): 751–57. Print.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy. “Insurgent Vulnerability and the Carbon Footprint of Gender.” Kvinder, K⊘n og Forskning 3–4 (2009): 2235. Print.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy. Undomesticated Ground: Recasting Nature as Feminist Space. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2000. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke UP, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. Transpositions. Malden: Polity, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Breitburg, Denise L., et al. “Ecosystem Engineers in the Pelagic Realm: Alteration of Habitat by Species Ranging from Microbes to Jellyfish.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 50.2 (2010): 188200. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Phil. “When the Public Knows Better: Popular Epidemiology Challenges the System.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 35.8 (1993): 1741. Print.Google Scholar
Di Chiro, Giovanna. “Local Actions, Global Visions: Remaking Environmental Expertise.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 18.2 (1997): 203–31. Print.Google Scholar
Goeminne, Gert. “Once upon a Time I Was a Nuclear Physicist: What the Politics of Sustainability Can Learn from the Nuclear Laboratory.” Perspectives on Science 19.1 (2011): 120. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Jorie. “Sea Change.” Sea Change. New York: Harper, 2008. 35. Print.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Hays, Samuel P. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1999. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitch, Sally, Adamson, Joni, and members of the Faculty Working Group on Humanities and Sustainability in 2008. Contributions of the Humanities to Issues of Sustainability. Tempe: Arizona State U, 2008. N. pag. Print.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
McKibben, Bill. The End of Nature. New York: Random, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
McKibben, Bill. U of Texas, Arlington. 10 Mar. 2010. Address.Google Scholar
Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, John P.How Sustainable Is the Idea of Sustainability?ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 10.1 (2003): 110. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandilands, Catriona. Personal communication. 28 Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
A Shared Fate. Narr. Hardy Jones. BlueVoice.org. BlueVoice, 23 June 2008. Web. 23 Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
350.org. 350.org, n.d. Web. July 2011.Google Scholar
Tree-Sit: The Art of Resistance. Dir. James Ficklin. Earth, 2005. DVD.Google Scholar
United Nations. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
United States. Environmental Protection Agency. “Environmental Management Systems (EMS).” EPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA, 15 Dec. 2011. Web. 5 Mar. 2012.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. Living in the End Times. London: Verso, 2011. Print.Google Scholar