Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:14:24.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spectacular History and the Politics of Theater: Sympathetic Arts in the Shadow of the Bastille

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Elizabeth D. Samet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's meditations on artificial society's perversions of natural sentiment, specifically on the theater's contribution to societal degeneration, provide a historical context for the dialogue between Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine about the nature of the French Revolution. Much of the debate over the political rights of man consisted of an analysis of his affective rights. It was in many ways a controversy over what could be considered a moral method for attaching an individual's sympathies. The problem of affective liberation stands behind Paine's quarrel with Burke's Reflections and with the victim Burke offered for the world's consideration in that text: Marie Antoinette. For Burke the emotions aroused by theater and by the tragic representation of historical events could liberate the spectator into constructive action. Exposing Burke's own affective imprisonment by the spectacle of revolution, Paine demanded instead a liberation through rational inquiry.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 118 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 1305 - 1319
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ayer, A. J. Thomas Paine. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.Google Scholar
Steven, Blakemore. Crisis in Representation: Thomas Paine, Mary Wollstonecraft, Helen Maria Williams, and the Rewriting of the French Revolution. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Boulton, James T. The Language of Politics in the Age of Wilkes and Burke. London: Routledge, 1963.Google Scholar
David, Bromwich. Politics by Other Means. New Haven: Ya le UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Edmund, Burke. A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly. Further Reflections on the Revolution in France. Ed. Ritchie, Daniel E. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1992. 27–72.Google Scholar
Edmund, Burke. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Edmund, Burke. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Ed. O'Brien, Conor Cruise. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.Google Scholar
Edmund, Burke. “To Edmond Malone.” C. 29 Nov. 1790. Selected Letters of Edmund Burke. Ed. Mansfield, Harvey C. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994. 110–11.Google Scholar
Edmund, Burke. The Works. 12 vols. Anglistica and Americana 155. New York: Hildesheim, 1975. Rpt. of The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. London: Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Frederick, Burwick. Illusion and the Drama: Critical Theory of the Enlightenment and Romantic Era. University Park: Penn State UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Chandler, James K. Wordsworth's Second Nature: A Study of the Poetry and Politics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans. The Literary Genres of Edmund Burke: The Political Uses of Literary Form. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans. “Theater and Countertheater in Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France.” Burke and the French Revolution: Bicentennial Essays. Ed. Blakemore, Steven. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1992. 26–28.Google Scholar
Denis, Diderot. Paradoxe sur le comédien. Œuvres. Paris: Garnier, 1946. 1033–88.Google Scholar
Philip, Fisher. Hard Facts: Setting and Form in the American Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Foner, Philip S., ed. Complete Writings of Thomas Paine. Vol. 2. New York: Citadel, 1945.Google Scholar
Fruchtman, Jack Jr. Thomas Paine: Apostle of Freedom. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 1994.Google Scholar
Tom, Furniss. “Stripping the Queen: Edmund Burke's Magic Lantern Show.” Burke and the French Revolution: Bicentennial Essays. Ed. Blakemore, Steven. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1992. 69–96.Google Scholar
William, Hazlitt. Characters of Shakespeare's Plays. Boston, 1818.Google Scholar
Hindson, Paul, and Gray, Tim. Burke's Dramatic Theory of Politics. Aldershot: Averbury, 1988.Google Scholar
Huet, Marie-Hélène. Rehearsing the Revolution: The Staging of Marat's Death, 1793–1797. Trans. Robert Hurley. Berkeley: U of California P, 1983.Google Scholar
Mary, Jacobus. Romanticism, Writing and Sexual Difference: Essays on The Prelude. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.Google Scholar
William, Jewett. Fatal Autonomy: Romantic Drama and the Rhetoric of Agency. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Samuel, Johnson. “The Plays of William Shakespeare: Preface.” Samuel Johnson. Ed. Greene, Donald. The Oxford Authors. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. 419–56.Google Scholar
Samuel, Johnson. “Prefaces, Biographical and Critical, to the Works of the English Poets: Addison.” Samuel Johnson. Ed. Greene, Donald. The Oxford Authors. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. 643–76.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Typography: Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics. Ed. Fynsk, Christopher. 1989. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Anne, Mallory. “Burke, Boredom, and the Theater of Counterrevolution.” PMLA 118 (2003): 224–38.Google Scholar
Bernard, Mandeville. The Fable of the Bees. Ed. Harth, Phillip. London: Penguin, 1989.Google Scholar
David, Marshall. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.Google Scholar
Susan, Maslan. “Resisting Representation: Theater and Democracy in Revolutionary France.” Representations 52 (1995): 27–51.Google Scholar
McPherson, Heather. “Picturing Tragedy: Mrs. Siddons as the Tragic Muse Revisited.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 33 (2000): 401–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvin, Peter H. “Burke on Theatricality and Revolution.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975): 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Paine. Rights of Man. Ed. Collins, Henry. New York: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Ronald, Paulson. Representations of Revolution (1789–1820). New Haven: Yale UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Christopher, Reid. “Burke's Tragic Muse: Sarah Siddons and the ‘Feminization’ of the Reflections.” Burke and the French Revolution: Bicentennial Essays. Ed. Blakemore, Steven. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1992. 1–27.Google Scholar
Daniel, Ritchie. E. Reconstructing Literature in an Ideological Age. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.Google Scholar
Maximilien, Robespierre. “Terror Is Nothing Else Than Justice.” The Penguin Book of Historic Speeches. Ed. MacArthur, Brian. London: Penguin, 1996. 182–84.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l'origine de l'inégalité. Discours sur les sciences et les arts [et] Discours sur l'origine de l'inégalité. Paris: Flammarion, 1992. 145–257.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Lettre à d'Alembert. Paris: Garnier, 1967.Google Scholar
Simon, Schama. Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar
Esther, Schor. Bearing the Dead: The British Culture of Mourning from the Enlightenment to Victoria. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Sechelski, Denise S. “Garrick's Body and the Labor of Art in Eighteenth-Century Theater.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 29 (1996): 369–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, Smith. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982. Rpt. of vol. 1 of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.Google Scholar