Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:04:49.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Shared Fate or a Common Destiny?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

J. Lawrence Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station

Extract

Robert burns, an astute student of human nature, wryly observes in his poem “To a Louse”: “O wad some Pow'r the giftie gi'e us / To see oursels as others see us.” What we may learn is not always palatable. It is no secret that, in the eyes of many of our colleagues in disciplines outside language and literature, English too often appears as a bewilderingly undisciplined discipline—irresistibly drawn to the latest fashionable theory, riven by tiresome factionalism, and shamelessly encroaching on the disciplinary territory of others. The view from within is not always rosy either, on the evidence of satirists such as David Lodge in Small World and Frederick Crews in Postmodern Pooh. In our own eyes, of course, we are stable, responsible, hard-working, and absolutely central to the humanities. It is our colleagues in foreign language departments, we sometimes insist, who are the fractious and feckless ones, and who give the humanities a bad name. But these, our closest colleagues, see us—institutionally, if not individually—as arrogant and imperialistic, and ill content to tend our own gardens, as Voltaire urged. The heart of the matter is that we deem ourselves qualified to teach and to write about works of literature in translation, sometimes without adequate knowledge of the language, culture, or relevant literary tradition. Moreover, in many institutions, world literature is the exclusive—and zealously guarded—province of the English department. How can we reconcile this disciplinary imperialism, not to mention our suspicions about the effectiveness of often balkanized foreign language departments, with the fact that for more than thirty years the most influential theorists have been French, German, and Russian (Auerbach, Bakhtin, Baudrillard, Derrida, Foucault, Habermas, Iser, Jakobson, Kristeva, et al.) and that, for the most part, we read them in translation too? Occasionally, of course, English faculty members have been the translators.

Type
What We Have in Common and How We are Different
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Balch, Stephen H., and Brasor, Gary Crosby. “Losing the Big Picture: The Fragmentation of the English Major since 1964.” National Association of Scholars. May 2000. 10 July 2002 <http://www.nas.org/reports/eng_maj/LosingTheBigPicture.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Bartlett, Thomas. “Undergraduates Heed the Writer's Muse.” Chronicle of Higher Education 15 Mar. 2002: A39.Google Scholar
Brod, Richard, and Welles, Elizabeth B.Foreign Language Enrollments in United States Institutions of Higher Education, Fall 1998.” ADFL Bulletin 31.2 (2000): 2229.Google Scholar
Burns, Robert. “To a Louse.” Selected Poetry and Prose of Robert Burns. Ed. Thornton, Robert D. Boston: Houghton, 1966. 7677.Google Scholar
Crews, Frederick C. Postmodern Pooh. New York: North Point, 2001.Google Scholar
Earned Degrees, AY 1996–98, 2000.” National Science Foundation Database System. July 2002. 28 Aug. 2002 <http://caspar.nsf.gov/>..>Google Scholar
Goldberg, David, and Welles, Elizabeth B.Successful College and University Foreign Language Programs, 1995–99: Part 1.” Profession 2001. New York: MLA, 2001. 117210.Google Scholar
Hoff, Peter, and Pinkerton, Mary. “Reconfiguring Language Departments: Friendly or Hostile Takeover?ADFL Bulletin 30.2 (1999): 5254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Bettina. “Characteristics of College and University Foreign Language Programs.” Profession 1989. New York: MLA, 1989. 3948.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. Paul. “Facing the Eighties.” ADE Bulletin 62 (1979): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Murray. “The Recent Revolution in Theory and the Survival of the Literary Disciplines.” ADE Bulletin 62 (1979): 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, David. Small World. London: Secker, 1984.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Katherine. “To Constance Garnett.” 8 Feb. 1921. The Collected Letters of Katherine Mansfield: 1920–21. Ed. O'Sullivan, Vincent and Scott, Margaret. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996. 176–77. Vol. 4 of The Collected Letters of Katherine Mansfield.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Thus Spake Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Trans. Alexander Tille. London: H. Henry, 1896. Powys Family Collection, Dorset County Museum, Dorchester.Google Scholar
Sanders, Claire. “Essex Closure Highlights Worrying Maths Trend.” Times Higher Education Supplement 8 Mar. 2002: 13.Google Scholar