Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:18:18.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schiz-ability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

The visitor to Karl Marx's Grave in London's highgate cemetery is confronted by a large polished granite plinth, atop which squats an imposing bronze head and shoulders of Marx. Although the artist Laurence Bradshaw designed the rectangular plinth as a proxy for Marx's body, the effect is still to emphasize the head, the supposed locus of Geist, esprit, intellect. Marx was a headworker, it is true. Even in the depths of poverty, plagued by bodily ailments, he was never obliged to purvey körperliche Arbeit (“body work,” “manual labor”) in the restricted sense—that is, a körperliche Arbeit located in a social split that structurally denies the body worker access to the abstractions of a developed geistige Arbeit (“intellectual labor”).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Trans. Lester, Mark and Stivale, Charles. New York: Columbia UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Demeure: Fiction and Testimony. The Instant of My Death [and] Demeure: Fiction and Testimony. By Maurice Blanchot and Derrida. Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2000. 15103. Print.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Demeure: Maurice Blanchot. Paris: Galilée, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Mochlos; or, The Conflict of the Faculties.” Logomachia: The Conflict of the Faculties. Ed. Rand, Richard. Trans. Rand and Wygant, Amy. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1992. 83112. Print. Trans. of “Mochlos ou le conflit des facultés.” Du droit à la philosophie. Paris: Galilée, 1990.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der klassischen deutschen Philosophie; mit Anhang: Karl Marx über Feuerbach vom Jahre 1845. Stuttgart: Dietz, 1888. Print.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. “Preface to the Pamphlet Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy.” Trans. K. M. Cook et al. Collected Works. By Karl Marx and Engels. Vol. 26. London: Lawrence, 1990. 519–20. Print.Google Scholar
Labica, Georges. Karl Marx: Les Ṣ Thèses sur Feuerbach ṣ. Paris: PUF, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “Thesen über Feuerbach.” Werke. By Marx and Friedrich Engels. Vol. 3. Berlin: Dietz, 1958. 57. Print.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “Theses on Feuerbach”. Trans. Richard Dixon et al. Collected Works. By Marx and Friedrich Engels. Vol. 5. New York: New York Intl., 1976. 38. Print.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. Die deutsche Ideologie. Werke. By Marx and Engels. Vol. 3. Berlin: Dietz, 1958. 9530. Print.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. The German Ideology. Trans. Richard Dixon et al. Collected Works. Vol. 5. New York: Intl., 1976. 19539. Print.Google Scholar
Rajchman, John. The Deleuze Connections. Cambridge: MIT P, 2000. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. Geistige und körperliche Arbeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. London: Routledge, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Outside in the Teaching Machine. 1993. New York: Routledge, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel. Benjamin's -abilities. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar