Article contents
Resurrection à la Russe: Tolstoy's The Living Corpse as Cultural Paradigm
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
This essay explores the sociocultural ramifications of a literary theme—fake suicide and resurrection—in Russia through an analysis of Tolstoy's drama The Living Corpse. Written in 1900, the work illustrates Tolstoy's theory that a play must have a central thematic “knot.” The knot Tolstoy chose was central not just for his play but for Russian culture in general. This knot engages four kinds of subtexts: it derives from a contemporary trial, it polemically attacks Chernyshevsky's notorious novel What Is to Be Done?, it marks a dialogue with the religious philosopher Fedorov, and it represents a development of ideas that Tolstoy had been exploring for almost fifty years. Subsequently, Tolstoy's reworking of the suicide-and-resurrection theme served as a point of departure for such twentieth-century authors as Mayakovsky, Erdman, Nabokov, and Bulgakov.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1992
References
Works Cited
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline9.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline10.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline12.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline13.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline15.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline18.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline19.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline20.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline21.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline23.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline24.png?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20201125010105126-0178:S0030812900104857:S0030812900104857jra_inline29.png?pub-status=live)
- 3
- Cited by