Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:03:56.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rereading Flaubert: Toward a Dialogue between First- and Second-Language Literature Teaching Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Betsy Keller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are many disparities in literary competence between teachers and students. It is emblematic of these differences that students in introductory college literature courses usually read assigned texts only once, while the teacher's normative experience involves multiple rereadings. For inexperienced readers in these classes, the task of acquiring literary competence may seem as difficult as learning a foreign language. Research in the study of foreign languages and literatures contains valuable insights for the teaching of first-language literature. The traditional lecture-and-discussion format fails to address the individual student's background knowledge, motivation for literary study, and personal response to texts. Prereading activities, tasks to accompany at-home reading, and collaborative strategies in class discussion can lead readers to engage texts more meaningfully in the introductory literature classroom.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 112 , Issue 1: Special Topic: The Teaching of Literature , January 1997 , pp. 56 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Balzac, Honoré de Père Goriot. Trans. Reed, Henry. New York: Signet, 1962.Google Scholar
Barnett, Marva A More Than Meets the Eye. Foreign Language Reading: Theory and Practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1989.Google Scholar
Brombert, Victor The Novels of Flaubert. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1966.10.1515/9781400874811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calinescu, Matei Rereading. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Carrell, Patricia L “Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Reading.” Modern Language Journal 73 (1989): 121–12.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb02534.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrol, Claude Madame Bovary. Goldwyn, 1991.Google Scholar
Chambers, Ross “Simplicité de cœur et duplicité textuelle. Etude d' ‘Un cœur simple.‘” MLN 96 (1981): 771–77.Google Scholar
Courbet, Gustave Un après-dîner à Ornans. Musée des Beaux-Arts, Lille.Google Scholar
Courbet, Gustave L'enterrement à Ornans. Musée d'Orsay, Paris.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan Flaubert: The Uses of Uncertainty. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Cuseo, Joseph B “Cooperative Learning: A Pedagogy for Diversity.” Cooperative Learning and College Teaching 3.1 (1992).Google Scholar
Debray-Genette, Raymonde “Narrative Figures of Speech in ‘A Simple Heart.‘” Critical Essays on Gustave Flaubert. Ed. Porter, Laurence M. Boston: Hall, 1986. 165–16.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave “Un cœur simple.” Trois contes. Paris: Flammarion, 1986. 43–78.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave Madame Bovary. Trans. Aveling, Marx. New York: Harper, 1950.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave “A Simple Heart.” Trans. Robert Baldick. The Story and Its Writer. Ed. Chambers, Ann. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford, 1991. 467–46.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H The Story of Art. London: Phaidon, 1972.Google Scholar
Harper, Sandra N “Strategies for Teaching Literature at the Undergraduate Level.” Modern Language Journal 72 (1988): 402–40.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang “The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach.” Reader-Response Criticism. Ed. Tompkins, Jane P. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980. 50–69.Google Scholar
Israel-Pellelier, Aimée Flaubert's Straight and Suspect Saints. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991.10.1075/pumrl.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Ernest The Critical Reception of Gustave Flaubert in the United States. 1860-1960. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.Google Scholar
Knutson, Elizabeth M “Teaching Whole Texts: Literature and Foreign Language Reading Instruction.” French Review 67 (1993): 12–25.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire “Literary Texts in the Classroom: A Discourse.” Modern Language Journal 69 (1985): 356–35.Google Scholar
Martin, Laurey K “Breaking the Sounds of Silence: Promoting Discussion of Literary Texts in Intermediate Courses.” French Review 66 (1993): 549–54.Google Scholar
Muyskens, Judith A “Teaching Second-Language Literatures: Past, Present and Future.” Modern Language Journal 67 (1983): 413–41.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1983.tb01526.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peillex, Georges Nineteenth-Century Painting. New York: Viking, 1964.Google Scholar
Rifelj, Rifelj Carol de “Teaching Madame Bovary through Writing.” Approaches to Teaching Flaubert's Madame Bovary. Ed. Laurence M. Porter and Eugene F. Gray. New York: MLA, 1995. 130–13.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Louise M Literature as Exploration. 5th ed. New York: MLA, 1995.Google Scholar
Steiner, Wendy “Literature and Painting.” Teaching Literature and Other Arts. Ed. Barricelli, Jean-Pierre, Gibaldi, Joseph, and Lauter, Estella. New York: MLA, 1990. 40–45.Google Scholar
Swaffar, Janet K., Arens, Katherine M., and Byrnes, Heidi Reading for Meaning: An Integrated Approach to Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice, 1991.Google Scholar